Steve
>
>
Matt Harris
VP OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Follow us on LinkedIn!
matt.har...@netfire.net
816-256-5446
www.netfire.com
> On Oct 24, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> >
> > We also observed this today, UTC morning, esp. across the pond, and our
> > alternative paths
with, but if it's actually the case that folks are just
still running just fine with the older modules on modern openstack then
that's fine too. What I really want to avoid is having to hire dev
contractors to write code to deal with this.
Thanks,
Matt
Matt Harris
VP OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Follow us on LinkedIn
Matt Harris
VP OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Follow us on LinkedIn!
matt.har...@netfire.net
816-256-5446
www.netfire.com
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 2:49 PM Matthew Petach wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> In general, no, there's nothing that prevents you from doing that.
> In days gone by, some networks
uting of abuse reports. So for an eyeball network,
you probably want those routed to your organization since most of your
customers won't have IT staff capable of dealing with them.
- mdh
Matt Harris
VP OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Follow us on LinkedIn!
matt.har...@netfire.net
816-256-5446
www.netfire.com
nseego line of 5G products, as they're
> woefully behind the times in their understanding of IPv4 subnetting as it
> exists in 2023. ^_^;
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
>
But how is their IPv6 support? ;)
Matt Harris
VP OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Follow us on LinkedIn!
matt.har...@netfire.net
816-256-5446
www.netfire.com
Matt Harris
VP OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Follow us on LinkedIn!
matt.har...@netfire.net
816-256-5446
www.netfire.com
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:36 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Am I correct to understand that 1.1.1.1 only does support via community
> forum?
>
> They had just enough interest in
filter
> in based on something like IRR data?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Charles Rumford (he/his/him)
> Network Engineer | Deft
> 1-312-268-9342 | charl...@deft.com
> deft.com
>
Matt Harris
VP OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Follow us on LinkedIn!
matt.har...@netfire.net
816-256-5446
www.netfire.com
[Removing peer...@he.net from this because there's no reason to spam them.]
Matt Harris|VP of Infrastructure
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 9:21 AM VOLKAN KIRIK
f us have discussed options which may be superior for a
variety of reasons.
- mdh
Matt Harris|VP of Infrastructure
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
censing costs are pretty
reasonable, too, imho.
Good luck with what you're trying to accomplish: maybe give the vSRX series
a shot if you're running on KVM.
- mdh
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
, and I'm
seeing them in the global routing table.
Anyone have any idea how this could happen where an ASN is in use,
transiting several major providers to the internet, but no whois data as if
it didn't exist?
Thanks,
Matt
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:03 PM William Herrin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Do you have any recommendations for VPN a
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 7:07 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> Peace,
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 4:38 PM Smahena Amakran
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:51 PM Adrian Perrig wrote:
> Dear Nanog,
>
> Knowing how challenging it is to
an API you can easily use from tooling to do stuff like auto-generate NAT
configs, DNS zones, DHCP configs, etc.
- mdh
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
r hand, would likely have much better luck,
were they to pursue such a thing.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:29 PM Vimal wrote:
> (Unsure if this is the right forum to ask this question, but here g
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk|Email Support
We build customized end-to-end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:35 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
> https://edgedns.status.akamai.com/
>
> Mark.
>
Seems to be
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 8:34 AM Noah wrote:
>
> Well baby boomers & gen-x will struggle to dump mail...I mean
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:46 AM Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> Maybe the innovative ‘green’ design had something to
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:43 AM Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> > On Mar 10, 2021, at 3:23 AM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> >
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:56 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
> Ostap,
>
> Why was this prefix revoked? And what is your
ance on modern hardware. I run a decent fleet of vSRX's on Hyper-V
and it works well. YMMV as always based on your own platform, but I don't
think that nested virtualization is something that we should be steering
clear of at this point.
- mdh
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:25 PM Joe Loiacono wrote:
> Only if you believe censorship has nothing to do with free spe
and reply just this once more and just one point here so that a lack
of response here won't be used as fodder by conspiracy theorists.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end
context." but lacks specificity with
regard to what safeguards they propose beyond the legal/regulatory ones
that already exist, so I'm not sure what more can really be said here.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
not impacted and the DE-CIX New York exchange did
> > not go down.
> >
> >
> > Ed d'Agostino
It looks as though something's going on again right now. I just lost
sessions to one of the two route servers, and some but not all of my other
peers on DE-CIX NY.
Matt Harris|Infrastruct
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 5:22 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> You can also use Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding. RPF is m
d
consequence of false positives resulting in additional support inquiries,
but overall is much better than trying to MITM secure connections from your
customer/user base.
Good luck!
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:51 PM Chris Boyd wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:55 AM, wrote:
> >
>
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tom Hill wrote:
> On 16/09/2020 11:18, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> > Quantum Fiber
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 6:43 AM Eliot Lear via NANOG wrote:
> The positive is that it a small club can establish gro
fiber as Daniel mentioned, reseat optic, the usual stuff. Try
replacement parts you have in stock, then go from there replacing the
cheapest components first before trying to replace the more costly ones.
What manufacturer optic are you using, and what sort of media specifically?
Matt Harris|Infr
on the wait list just in case that time comes.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
ools?
> >
> > In addition to ping.pe, I like https://bgp.he.net but would love to
> hear your thought about other tool recommendations as especially the ones
> that are distributed.
> >
> > Mehmet
>
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Loo
t;
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nathaniel
>
>
>
>
>
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
to walk an end-user through lots of steps to do so.
The more relevant data, the better.
Thanks,
Matt
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jared Brown wrote:
> My no-effort quote from last month lists just the box at $13,
east -
am I wrong, or has this changed at some point?
- Matt
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions.
nce get
you good placement within google results (there's no SEO black magic that
works, either.)
You can of course also purchase advertising space within contexts that your
potential customers are likely to visit.
Good luck!
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for
the same
time, we're talking about back doors here when many of the same folks
worried about these back doors also have wide open front doors at the same
time.
Matt Harris|CIO
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver innovative IT solutions.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:50 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Christopher Morrow
Matt Harris|CIO
816-256-5446|Direct
Looking for something?
Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal
We build and deliver innovative IT solutions.
> wrote:
> >
>
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:46 PM Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 08:51 John Curran wrote:
>
>> On 7 Jan 2020, at 5:01 AM, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know of
>> cases where Cogent has
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:34 AM Royce Williams
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 7:17 AM Matt Harris wrote:
>
>>
>> The better solution here isn't to continue to support known-flawed
>> protocols, which perhaps puts those same populations you're referring to
>> her
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 9:11 AM Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 12/31/19 12:50 AM, Ryan Hamel wrote:
> > Just let the old platforms ride off into the sunset as originally
> > planned like the SSL implementations in older JRE installs, XP, etc. You
> > shouldn't be holding onto the past.
>
>
> Because
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 2:30 AM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Why do I need Wikipedia SSLed? I know the argument. But if it doesn’t
> work why not either let it fall back to 1.0 or to HTTP.
>
> This seems like security for no valid reason.
Being able to authenticate
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:51 AM Bottiger wrote:
> I sent an email to noc at gtt.net from 2 different emails and both got a
> reply saying:
>
> 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.4.1 Recipient address rejected:
> Access denied [HE1EUR01FT058.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com]'
>
> Not sure
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:29 AM Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> --- s...@donelan.com wrote:
> From: Sean Donelan
>
> Its very practical for a country to cut 95%+ of its Internet connectivity.
> Its not a complete cut-off, there is some limited connectivity. But for
> most ordinary individuals, their
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:08 AM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> A thought crossed my mind the other day as I was having a discussion with
> someone.
>
> Every entity is suppose to justify their need for IPv4 address space from
> ARIN. This was always (in recent history)
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:46 AM Ryland Kremeier
wrote:
> Can confirm. Currently on VDSL in rural Missouri, speed is capped at
> 5Mb/s, but has the capability of 7.5Mb/s. All customers from the provider
> here are on VDSL.
>
I'm guessing from your email address that you get that from your
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:25 PM Rod Beck
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I discovered that the Budapest cable company was using VDLS to provide
> services up to 500 megs into the buildings where my flats are located. VDSL
> is a pretty old standard. I recollect people talking about it back in 1998.
>
> Is it
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 5:28 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > URLs are an obvious candidate to consider because they're in use, seem
> > to basically work to identify routing endpoints, and are far from a
> > random, out of thin air, choice.
>
> In reality, you’re not really talking about URLs here,
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:42 PM Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
> >> Automatic renumbering involving DNS was important design goal
> >> of IPv6 with reasons.
> >>
> >> Lack of it is still a problem.
>
> > Meanwhile, the thing that most people miss
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:46 PM John Levine wrote:
> In article rcjz0hb1bcq2zy1hsdyosn...@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >For a small organization with limited staff and small margins, I'm curious
> >where the actual burden in supporting IPv6 lies. In my experience, it's
> not
> >any more costly
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:48 AM Dovid Bender wrote:
> Antonios,
>
> It's certainly financial but it's not just companies being cheap. For
> example for smaller companies with a limited staff and small margins. They
> may want to have v6 everywhere but lack the resources to do it. It would
> for
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:33 AM Antonios Chariton
wrote:
> Dear list,
> First of all, let me apologize if this post is not allowed by the list. To
> my best interpretation of the guidelines [1] it is allowed, but may be in a
> gray area due to rule #7.
>
> I would like to propose the following
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:22 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:11:32PM +0200,
> Jeroen Massar wrote
> a message of 101 lines which said:
>
> > - Using a centralized/forced-upon DNS service (be that over DoT/DoH
> > or even plain old Do53
>
> Yes, but people using a
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:44 PM ADNS NetBSD List Subscriber
wrote:
>
> Also, we’d like to ditch our 3640 router in favor of a smaller “desktop”
> size router, but none of them seem to do BGP (not surprising). Any
> recommendations on hardware would be welcome as well
>
I can think of lots of
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 5:05 PM Jim Shankland wrote:
> 1. Rate seems too slow to do any actual damage (is anybody really
> bothered by a few bad SYN packets per second per service, at this
> point?); but
>
Common technique used by port scanners to evade detection as a DoS attack
by fw/ids/etc.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 10:41 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> What can we do better as network operators about hate sites like 8Chan?
>
What is a "hate site" and who gets to decide what constitutes a "hate
site"? These are the most dangerous questions of our time, because once we
begin sliding down the
ns server,
> security, etc. I would greatly appreciate any help.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
--
Matt Harris - Chief Security Officer
Security, Compliance, a
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:21 AM Shaun Dombrosky
wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
>
>
> First time NANOG poster, apologies if I breach etiquette.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have any first-hand data on how much data a small-medium
> business (SMB) can expect to consume in a failover scenario over a 4G/LTE
>
ing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately reply to the
> sender by email notifying them of the error and delete the original and
> reply copies. Thank you.*
>
>
>
--
Matt Harris - Chief Security Officer
Security, Compliance, and Engineering
Main: +1-816-256-5446
Mobile: +1-908-590-9472
Email: m...@netfire.net
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:05 AM Nathan Brookfield <
nathan.brookfi...@simtronic.com.au> wrote:
> Yeah because v6 only is the answer plus tour assuming all of these clubs
> have routers and BGP and the money to get an allocation and ASN
>
If any amateur radio folks want to use a v6 block
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM John Curran wrote:
>
> In which case, I’d recommend contacting Hank Magnuski to obtain
> documentation of your particular interpretation, as there are no published
> policy documents which indicate anything other than an allocation from the
> general purpose IPv4
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:41 AM John Curran wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:34 AM, Matt Harris wrote:
>
> Hey John, I understand that, however my understanding is that the
> establishment of an ARIN RSA is required prior to the transfer of a block
> or a portion or a
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:29 AM John Curran wrote:
>
> Matt -
>
> Chris is correct. Those who received IPv4 address blocks by InterNIC (or
> its predecessors) prior to the inception of ARIN on 22 December 1997 are
> legacy resource holders, and continue to receive those same registry
>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:54 AM John Curran wrote:
>
> As stated before, ARIN did receive and process a request from the 44/8
> registrant to transfer a portion of the block to another party.
>
> For all transfer requests, we review and confirm:
>
> - That the source of the transfer is the legal
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:38 AM Brielle wrote:
>
> > On Jul 19, 2019, at 6:03 AM, John Curran wrote:
> > Be specific in your report regarding what change you believe was in
> error and why – we investigate all such reports and will correct any
> changes made in error.
>
> Actually, I’d love to
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:45 PM William Waites wrote:
>
> Then we can decide, openly and transparently, if, for example, some piece
> of
> 44/8 should be returned to IANA for allocation to the RIRs.
>
This sounds like the more correct answer with regard to what should be done
with space that
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:30 AM Robert Webb wrote:
> So I have a situation where I am trying to get LTE to an out of band
> router and there is no signal available in the data center. There was a
> booster setup purchased and I have a manager telling me that standards,
> industry and not local,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:01 AM Robert Webb wrote:
> Anyone out there deal with data center design?
>
> Looking for any info available which provides guidelines on putting
> antennas, like LTE booster, in the data center.
>
Not quite sure what you're looking for here Robert. As far as placing
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:20 AM Joe Nelson wrote:
> Does anyone know who to contact to have old information removed from
> Level3/CenturyLink's IRR. My ASN still shows in their registry with stale
> information from an old customer of theirs but I can't seem to find anyone
> at CenturyLink that
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 11:35 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Great point ;-) thanks Tom
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 09:29 Tom Daly wrote:
>
>> Mehmet,
>>
>> Good idea, the opportunity for innovation and supporting ideas of others
>> in our operator groups is important, but NANOG is probably the wrong
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:32 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
> Encouraging folks to contribute to specific individuals directly may be a
>> little more difficult though, compared to, say, getting a legitimate
>> organization going that provides (likely objectively-determined
>> merit-based) payouts to
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:41 AM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> The members of this list are, I think, much more aware tham most that
> a lot of critical Internet software is maintained by unfunded
> volunteers, and of the systemic risks that result from this.
>
> I'm attacking the problem at the
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:27 AM Martin Pels
wrote:
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/maintnote/
>
You may want to explain what you're linking to, since that url points to
context which is locked to those of us who are not authorized to view it.
It's very helpful when dropping a link to provide
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 6:12 PM Eric Tykwinski
wrote:
> This is the second time I’ve seen WireGuard this past week, and honestly
> sounds really promising.
> I’m probably going to test out on VyOS since I know it has support, but
> any word on ASA or JunOS?
> I.E. is this going to export to
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:59 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> OpenVPN in pfSense?
>
> We run tons of these around the world.
>
> Mark.
>
>
With the client config generator package, "openvpn-client-export",
installed, this is imho the best option for an end-user VPN. pfSense has a
much nicer UI than
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:46 AM Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2019, at 18:10, David Guo via NANOG wrote:
> >
> > Send abuse complaint to the upstreams
> >
> > Get Outlook for iOS
>
> Yes, but which of these is more effective?
>
With some upstreams, I wonder if getting Outlook for iOS
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:13 PM Hansen, Christoffer <
christof...@netravnen.de> wrote:
> Appreciate the warning!
>
> On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote:
> > These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using the
> NANOG domain. They are not messages coming from the NANOG
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:01 PM Patrick Schultz
wrote:
> https://support.google.com/websearch/contact/ip/
>
>
Thanks!
Giving that a shot. It's still loading www.google.com though if I try to
hit it in a browser (not redirecting to a different language/CCTLD specific
site though) so I had to
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:44 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:11 PM Matt Harris wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:06 PM Christopher Morrow <
> morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> not sure where you are starting from (real
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:24 PM Filip Hruska wrote:
> Google maintains their own GeoIP database. If you peer with them and have
> access to the peering portal, you can correct the location yourself.
> Otherwise they have a public form somewhere.
>
> --- Filip
>
Googling around a bit does not
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> I would say that it says BOM at the start of the name, perhaps they are
> sending you to India?
>
> Are you using a DNS service that uses ECS facing the various CDN/Cloud
> providers or a different one?
>
This is my thinking, too, however my
Hey folks,
Looking at an mtr going out via a couple of different transit circuits,
Google seems to be doing weird things.
RTT pinging google.com is coming up with like 250-300ms times, but mtr's
are telling me my packets are hitting google's network very quickly.
Google's network then seems to
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 4:37 PM Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> Anecdotally, ARIN has, in the past, gotten involved in this sort of thing.
> Many years ago, during an acquisition that went sour at the last minute,
> the renegging seller went to ARIN complaining that we were hijacking his
> IP space. ARIN
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:49 PM William Herrin wrote:
> I personally support the petition. I think the out of scope reasoning is
> flawed. By enforcing minimum assignment sizes, ARIN has long acted as a
> gatekeeper to the routing system, controlling who can and can not
> participate. For
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:28 AM Carlos Friaças via NANOG
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to let everybody know that a petition was started in order to try
> to enable a policy discussion about "BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy
> Violation".
>
> If you would like to read the proposal, it is available at:
> > On Apr 9, 2019, at 21:05, Nathan Anderson wrote:
> > a FB page that this account of hers was apparently the only admin for.
> >
>
Redundancy: it's not just a concept to be applied to devices and wiring.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:34 AM John Alcock wrote:
> Well,
>
> I did all three above and still had issues. I am still having issues. I
> had to contact many people to get off of various blacklists, etc. These
> are lists that are not publish and you will not know until you start using
> the
Figures it'd be people from Lawrence. I'm pretty sure everyone there is
drunk all of the time. ;)
Although admittedly I only stop in there for drinks when I'm on my way back
from motorsports events in Topeka. Definitely a nice little town if what
you want is a beer.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 9:23 PM wrote:
>
> > [Today's discussion is about whether I solved the spam problem. Not
> about how
> > I'm gonna distribute the solution]
>
> You apparently don't understand that how the solution gets distributed is a
> very important part of whether the solution will
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:33 AM lobna gouda wrote:
> Hello Networks,
>
> Might sound unprofessional, but seriously Wanted to get your views about
> upcoming technlogies or market. Things like virtualization, cloud
> services , automation and SDN models and its use cases have actually done
>
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:04 PM Paul WALL wrote:
>
> https://www.quora.com/Is-it-now-considered-business-etiquette-only-to-include-an-email-signature-in-the-first-email-to-someone-and-not-in-subsequent-replies-to-the-same-message
>
> https://www.lifewire.com/email-signature-location-1173260
>
>
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:41 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> Maybe this?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fund
> https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service-fund
> https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service
>
>
> Kinda crappy they don't spell it out. Well, no, I guess USF would
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:06 PM Brandon Wade via NANOG
wrote:
> We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we now
> have a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We only
> purchase IP Transit services from them, nothing else, and have never had
> any fees
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:53 PM William Herrin wrote:
>
> Your bank charges you service fees?
>
> When I opened an additional checking account so I'd have something to
> link paypal to, it was free.
>
Plus you don't earn rewards points. I use an amex charge card for just
about everything,
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 2:26 PM William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:07 PM Denys Fedoryshchenko
> wrote:
> > It would be better for them(AMZN, SMCI, AAPL) to prove that these
> > events did not take place - in court.
>
> "Can't prove a negative."
>
> > In the opposite case, even if
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:20 AM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> I'm rolling my eyes. We'll be using IPv6, but obviously we need IPv4 too.
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 12:00 PM John Lee wrote:
>
>> If is a new US business and you are working internationally why not go
>> simple and use IPv6 addresses?
>>
>>
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
