Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

, the board, staff, or provided feedback via the contact form on the website, and who knows it could have come from young women. Those voices do not have to come from the mailing list, to be just as valid as ours. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Paul WALL Sent

Re: Any info on AT Wireless Outage?

No $5 received here.. Just a text message saying, "It's AT We apologize for Thursday's outage, which may have impacted you. As a valued customer, your connection matters and we are committed to doing better.” I had the thought the other day that maybe this was a hack and that they didn’t want

Re: Any info on AT Wireless Outage?

The same as well for FirstNet but am now able to make calls. Others who are on AT are unable to receive or send calls. Enabling wifi calling on a regular AT phone (android) results in a 502 bad gateway error message. Ryan > On Feb 22, 2024, at 08:11, Ray Orsini via NANOG wr

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

nly hurting yourself. I have yet to come across an enterprise that uses it between internal VLANs or policies/zones, where the same threat potential can be, especially in a DMZ. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of William Herrin Sent: Friday, February 16, 202

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

ing on how it is implemented, with minimal effort. This video tells the story of NAT and the Cisco PIX, straight from the creators https://youtu.be/GLrfqtf4txw Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of sro...@ronan-online.com Sent: Friday, February 16, 20

Re: The Reg does 240/4

Allocating 240/4 only temporarily drives down pricing until it's all assigned, then we're all back at square one. Ya know what does not put us back square one, nor waste our time? Implementing IPv6. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Christopher Hawker Sent

Re: The Reg does 240/4

Tim, How is that Mikrotik a let down? Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Tim Howe Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 12:04:50 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: The Reg does 240/4 Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care when

Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?

Mike, The numbers have not bounced back to pre-pandemic levels, and it doesn't help that NANOG 90 has had some hotel issues. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 5:31:02 AM To: nanog Subject: NANOG 90 Attendance

Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

tance is futile." That is the last of my .02c for this thread. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Abraham Y. Chen via NANOG Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2024 9:06:28 AM To: Chris Adams Cc: Chen, Abraham Y. ; NANOG Subject: Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100

Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

Abraham, It has existed for many years, already supported on many devices, does not require NAT, address space is plentiful, does not require additional proposals, and it accounts for 40% of the traffic at Google. Ryan From: Abraham Y. Chen Sent: Friday

Re: Stealthy Overlay Network Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

Abraham, You may not need permission from the IETF, but you effectively need it from every networking vendor, hardware vendor, and OS vendor. If you do not have buy in from key stakeholders, it's dead-on arrival. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Abraham Y. Chen

Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

Abraham, You're arguing semantics instead of the actual point. Residential customers want Internet access, not intranet access. Again, VRFs are plentiful and so are CG-NAT firewall appliances or servers to run those VMs. Save yourself the time and effort on this and implement IPv6. Ryan

Re: 202401102221.AYC Re: Streamline The CG-NAT Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

as they can match a MAC address of the customer router + MAC address of the carrier equipment, to the DHCP and flow logs. As along as the carrier implements IPv6, it will cut down on the active NAT sessions and port forwards the equipment needs to process. Ryan Hamel

Re: Fastly Peering Contact

(and I'm sure still is) mutual performance and cost incentive to peer everywhere that it makes sense, and where technically feasible to do so. Hope you all get a reply in short order. Cheers, Ryan Disclaimer: things may have changed - my message here is not authoritative on current policy postur

Re: CPE/NID options

the circuit without a truck roll. Ryan Hamel From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 6:41 AM To: Ryan Hamel Cc: Christopher Hawker ; North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: CPE/NID options Caution: This is an external email and may

Re: CPE/NID options

The problem with using switches as a CPE device is the lack of RFC2544 (or equivalent) testing, and monitoring of the complete circuit with TWAMP. Both of which are used to ensure compliance with an SLA. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Josh Luthman Sent

Re: ipv6 address management - documentation

choices, and is worth deploying on a server or VPS, even for home labs. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Christopher Hawker Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 3:52:59 PM To: Aaron Gould ; Owen DeLong Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: ipv6 address management

Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting?

Matt, Why would HE hijack Cogent's IP space? That would end in a lawsuit and potentially even more de-peering between them. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Matt Corallo Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 11:32 AM To: Bryan Fields ; nanog@nanog.org Subject

Re: Congestion/latency-aware routing for MPLS?

. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Mark Tees Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 10:01:06 AM To: Tom Beecher Cc: nanog Subject: Re: Congestion/latency-aware routing for MPLS? Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care when clicking links

Re: MX204 tunnel services BW

c 1 port 7 speed 10g Regards, Ryan \ Original Message On Oct. 16, 2023, 12:49, Jeff Behrns via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > JTAC says we must disable a physical port to allocate BW for tunnel-services. > Also leaving tunnel-services bandwidth un

Re: transit and peering costs projections

Why not place the routers in Dallas, aggregate the transit, IXP, and PNI's there, and backhaul it over redundant dark fiber with DWDM waves or 400G OpenZR? Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Tim Burke Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2023 8:45 PM To: Dave Taht Cc

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

Solid Optics? -- https://www.solid-optics.com/product/edfamux-multiplexer-amplifier-dispersion-compensation-dwdm-mux-edfa/ Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Dave Bell Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 6:52 AM To: Mark Tinka Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Low

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

Yes, I already tried rebooting several times. Perhaps a large hammer will fix it! At least I know I'll be well notified in an emergency. > On Oct 4, 2023, at 14:42, Sean Donelan wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Ryan A. Krenzischek wrote: >> I've only gotten the alert now ...9 ti

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

I've only gotten the alert now ...9 times. Ryan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

Matt, It's not just you or Google, I just got those emails to my Office 365 at the same time. My guess is that the list admins/moderators got the emails and just responded without approving the moderated emails. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Matthew Petach

Re: Guest Column: Kentik's Doug Madory, Last Call for Upcoming ISOC Course + More

things? Y'all have been making a mountain out of a molehill. Ryan From: Tom Beecher Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2023 9:30:13 AM To: Martin Hannigan Cc: Ryan Hamel ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Guest Column: Kentik's Doug Madory, Last Call for Upcoming ISOC

Re: Guest Column: Kentik's Doug Madory, Last Call for Upcoming ISOC Course + More

y not true. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Randy Bush Sent: Friday, September 8, 2023 5:25 PM To: John Gilmore Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Guest Column: Kentik's Doug Madory, Last Call for Upcoming ISOC Course + More Caution: This is an external ema

Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup

Paschal, It is not supported, nor is it recommended for redundancy in a routed setup. Please describe your (desired) topology, that way the community can discuss alternatives. Thanks, Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Pascal Masha Sent: Monday, August 21

Re: 10G CPE w/VXLAN - vendors?

, Level3/Lumen, Zayo, etc. Juniper's ACX7024 does look interesting as a building demarc/agg device, but overkill for a single client CPE. It can't hold full tables for transit handoffs, but the customer can establish multi-hop BGP sessions upstream for that. Ryan Hamel

Re: 10G CPE w/VXLAN - vendors?

I fully agree here too. That's why I proposed a "smarter" CPE to replace the standard appliances deployed on site, where the only thing changing is the configuration on the device itself, not product being handed off. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on beha

Re: 10G CPE w/VXLAN - vendors?

s very well. I also agree with your stance on Broadcom, it's hard to come up with alternatives that are not ADVA/Ciena/Cisco/RAD. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Mark Tinka Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2023 10:30 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re:

Re: 10G CPE w/VXLAN - vendors?

The problem with these switch suggestions is the lack of RFC2544 testing, and jitter + latency monitoring required for meeting SLA. That is why I mentioned the FPGA solution. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Brandon Price Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2023 2

Re: 10G CPE w/VXLAN - vendors?

the vendor personally and have not worked on their hardware, so your mileage may vary. Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Joe Freeman Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2023 12:19:26 PM To: Adam Thompson ; nanog Subject: Re: 10G CPE w/VXLAN - vendors? Caution

Re: IPv4 Subnet 23.151.232.0/24 blackholed?

the LOA, or they have unfiltered transit circuits, which is worrisome. Ryan -- Original Message -- From "Neel Chauhan" To nanog@nanog.org Date 4/25/2023 7:35:40 PM Subject IPv4 Subnet 23.151.232.0/24 blackholed? Hi, I recently got the IPv4 allocation 23.151.232.0/24 from AR

RE: Lima, OH Spectrum/Charter Severe Node/Hop Latency Issues

at the firewall level, which is different from packet loss and disconnects. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Austin Ayers via NANOG Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 1:49 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Lima, OH Spectrum/Charter Severe Node/Hop Latency Issues Hello all, One of my NetOps

RE: GTT blocking IPv4 address 128.31.0.39

. Ryan Hamel -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Neel Chauhan Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 7:49 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: GTT blocking IPv4 address 128.31.0.39 Hi, I am a customer of ReliableSite in their New Jersey location, and RS uses GTT as a transit ISP, along

IP Blocked from Airbnb

Hello Everyone, If there is someone on this list from Airbnb who can get an IP address removed from a block list, please contact me off list. Thanks! Ryan Hamel

RE: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12

: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 On Thu, Dec 8 2022 at 12:38 PM, Job Snijders mailto:nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: Hi all, On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 08:24:54PM -0800, Ryan Hamel wrote: AS3356 has been announcing 2000::/12 for about 3 hours now, an aggregate covering over 23K pr

RE: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12

These as well: 3257 3356 3491 3356 They probably leaked a hold down route. Ryan Hamel -Original Message- From: Christopher Morrow Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 8:48 PM To: r...@rkhtech.org Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 11:25

AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12

AS3356 has been announcing 2000::/12 for about 3 hours now, an aggregate covering over 23K prefixes (just over 25%) of the IPv6 DFZ. Prayers for anyone impacted, the team announcing it, and the team resolving the issue. Ryan Hamel

RE: Sites blocking ISP Addresses

Based on experience, all I can say is good luck. They do not respond to anyone. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of James Dexter Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 8:43 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Sites blocking ISP Addresses Dear list, We have address ranges that are being blocked

RE: BCP38 For BGP Customers

handoff. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 3:17 PM To: Charles Rumford Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers This may not exist yet, but what about a uRPF-like feature that uses RPKI, IRR, etc. instead of current BGP feed

Re: any dangers of filtering every /24 on full internet table to preserve FIB space ?

urse did have functioning default routes from our upstream — but that doesn’t help since the /20 from a peer was attracting and blackholing the traffic. As IPv4 continues to desegregate and get resold and otherwise optimized, I imagine this will become more common. Not a problem for a multi-home

RE: AS15960 abuse contact?

Might as well send it to their upstream abuse contacts and state their customer is unresponsive. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Tim Burke Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 1:10 PM To: nanog@nanog.org list Subject: AS15960 abuse contact? Anyone have an abuse contact at AS15960

Are there any DNS POCs from Raytheon on here?

Please reach out to me. Ryan Stephenson Defense Information Systems Agency DoD NIC IE721 UE: ryan.m.stephenson2@mail.mil

RE: HE.net and BGP Communities

Yes. Ryan -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2022 12:36 PM To: Nanog Subject: HE.net and BGP Communities The last mention I found on NANOG about HE.net and BGP communities for traffic engineering is from April 2021 and said they provided

AWS - IP Address is Blocked?

their block list or explain what is happening, I would greatly appreciate if you could contact me off list. Thank you very much for your time. Ryan Hamel

Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal?

A company I work for designs a lot of our own hardware and we’ve had a number of critical components go EOL suddenly and without warning, such as FPGAs, ADCs, clock generators, and SOMs just to name a few. Just a few weeks ago we were informed that a large order of FPGAs was not going to be

RE: Ukraine request yikes

It’s already spread to the news - https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ukraine-icann-russia-internet-runet-disconnection-1314278/ Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of George Herbert Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:17 AM To: Nanog Subject: Ukraine request yikes Posted

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

t communities have almost zero options. Similar to the San Jose examples, we are near some of the most dense connectivity in the world. Travel 20-30 minutes in certain directions from Ashburn and you’re quickly seeing farms and limited connectivity. Ryan >> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:2

Re: junos config commit question

If it's before committing the changes just run "top" to get back to the root of the configuration tree, then "rollback 0" to go back to the version before any changes were made, then just "exit" out. Ryan On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 2:20 PM Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6B

Re: home router battery backup

installed on some of my indoor equipment.. router, one WiFi AP, Synology file server, x86 linux server. While we almost never lose power at my house, yesterday we lost power for 7 minutes. I maintained Internet connectivity throughout the brief outage. Ryan Wilkins > On Jan 12, 2022, at 12:35

Re: Cloudflare Abuse Contact

Hi Mike, Please reach out to me directly. Best, *Tanner Ryan *| Network Engineer Cloudflare, Inc. | as13335.peeringdb.com On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 2:39 PM Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote: > Cloudlfare might be able to help, but dns flood might be spoofed. > > It's possible that C

RE: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA)

of CenturyLink's device with the bursts of traffic. Ryan -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Neel Chauhan Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 6:44 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Hi NANOG Mailing List, I don't know if any of you work

Re: Facebook post-mortems...

> On Oct 5, 2021, at 10:32 AM, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG > wrote: > > If you have some DNS working, you can point it at a static “we are down and > we know it” page much sooner, At the scale of facebook that seems extremely difficult to pull off w/o most of their architecture online.

Re: Facebook post-mortems...

Niels, you are correct about my initial tweet, which I updated in later tweets to clarify with a hat tip to Will Hargrave as thanks for seeking more detail. Cheers, Ryan On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 08:24 Niels Bakker wrote: > * telescop...@gmail.com (Lou D) [Tue 05 Oct 2021, 15:12 C

Re: facebook outage

> On Oct 4, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > > >> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:10 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: >>> >>> They’re starting to pick themselves back up off the floor in the last two >>> or three minutes. A few

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

Jeroen, > You people keep on giving money to ISPs that are not providing the service you want. Not everyone has the luxury of picking their ISP, and the common consumer doesn't know or care about IPv6. They want Netflix to work and that's it. Ryan On Sat, Sep 4, 2021, 1:47 PM Jeroen Mas

RE: Microsoft peering contact

Tomas, In the bottom left corner, there is an escalation matrix based on priority, depending on the issue you can work up the chain at a reasonable pace. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Tomas Lynch Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 10:21 AM To: NANOG Subject: Microsoft peering contact

BGP - Traffic Management

these more specifics are also visible on an MPLS backbone where other transit routers will prepend the AS path upstream based on specific communities to prevent anycast routing. Thanks, Ryan

Equinix Sales Rep

I know this might flood my inbox on a Friday, but I am looking for recommendations on sales rep at Equinix that understand the carrier space. I need to find out more information about their Equinix Fabric product and it has been about 10 years since I have worked with Equinix

Verizon’s ESInet

Would someone from Verizon or someone familiar with Verizon’s ESInet please contact me off list . Ryan

RE: VoP regulatory consultant

Thanks Tim. I have been a member of that listserv for years. It is very US focused. That’s why I thought I would ask the larger NANOG community. Ryan -Original Message- From: Tim Nelson Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 9:28 AM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: VoP

RE: SITR/SHAKEN implementation in effect today (June 30 2021)

This should help with Robo calls a lot. -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Sean Donelan Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 2:31 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: SITR/SHAKEN implementation in effect today (June 30 2021) STIR/SHAKEN Broadly Implemented Starting Today

RE: Email and Web Hosting

of revenue but did not have to support it. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Steve Saner Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 10:42 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Email and Web Hosting I hope this isn't too far off topic for this list. We acquired a small ISP a couple years ago that has its roots

RE: Email and Web Hosting

Tucows/OpenSRS works well for “ISP email” From: NANOG On Behalf Of K. Scott Helms Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 11:14 AM To: Steve Saner Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Email and Web Hosting Two decent options, one on prem and the other fully hosted. Tucows/OpenSRS has a fully hosted email

VoP regulatory consultant

Would anyone have any recommendations on regulatory consultants for VoIP within North America but markets outside the US? Get Outlook for iOS

RE: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs

At a few sites of mine, I’ve seen Cisco NCS 520 devices for local in-rack deployments, and NCS 540’s for aggregation and extension handoffs. Looking at their datasheets real fast, MPLS + EVPN support come in on the 540 series. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Shawn L via NANOG Sent

Re: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs

I've been deploying the 7210 SAS S and Sx for a while now as MPLS PEs. I haven't had any major issues. Mixes well with our existing Juniper infrastructure. --ryan On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:26 AM Thomas Scott wrote: > > Second vote for the Nokia 7200 line, their price points are hard t

any POCs for cicimar.ipn.mx available?

There are some DNSSEC issues with ipn.mx. https://dnsviz.net/d/cicimar.ipn.mx/dnssec/ Are there any POCs available to inform of the errors? Ryan Stephenson Defense Information Systems Agency DoD NIC IE721 COM: 614-692-5284 | DSN: 312-850-5284 UE: ryan.m.stephenson2@mail.mil CE

RE: Juniper hardware recommendation

Hello! We wouldn’t be able to give any sort of answer without knowing your current and future requirements. Each model has its own throughput classes, and sometimes a full on MX router isn’t required. From: NANOG On Behalf Of Javier Gutierrez Guerra Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 1:55 PM

RE: DoD IP Space

Mel, I hope you're not implementing this in an ISP network, it's not net neutral if a carrier is making a (political) route/filtering decision. (Points to The Great Firewall of China) Ryan -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mel Beckman Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2021 4:17 PM

RE: Twitter is down (What a shame)

Twitter works for me on desktop and mobile. From: NANOG On Behalf Of ADNS NetBSD List Subscriber Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 5:23 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Twitter is down (What a shame) Looks like backend is down – main page loads, no content. Does this mean we return to a

RE: Suspicious IP reporting

on Linux, ipfw/pf on *BSD, etc. Ryan From: JoeSox Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 5:04 PM To: r...@rkhtech.org Cc: TJ Trout ; NANOG Subject: Re: Suspicious IP reporting How do I setup a firewall when I am not a Verizon engineer? There is a firewall via the antivirus and operating system

RE: Suspicious IP reporting

at the ISP, and waste more time getting to the underlying issue. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of JoeSox Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 4:41 PM To: TJ Trout Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Suspicious IP reporting Do others see this online bully started by Tom? The leader has spoken so the minions

Re: Any2 Los Angeles down again

If you haven't already, I encourage you to subscribe to Coresite's maintenance notifications. Not sure it needs to be duplicated as a notification service to nanog@. // Status: Scheduled Risk: Interruption to primary connectivity MaintenanceType: Emergency Maintenance Reason for Work: Network

RE: Verizon FiOS/Google Peering Issues in Northeast?

They’re saying it’s a fiber cut in Brooklyn. https://twitter.com/VerizonSupport/status/1354109889572982786 Would be interesting to see the RFO on this. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Robert Webb Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 9:14 AM To: Brian Loveland Cc: North American Network

RE: Verizon FiOS/Google Peering Issues in Northeast?

Brian, It’s an overall Verizon issue, they say it’s a fiber cut in Brooklyn https://twitter.com/VerizonSupport/status/1354109889572982786?s=20, but that would be a single point of failure. Quite a discussion on the outages mailing list. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Brian Loveland

Re: Global Peer Exchange

That's Cogent for ya. Ryan On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, 10:14 AM Paul Emmons wrote: > > You take down a 10g connection and they bill each side $.2 a meg, 95th >> percintile billing. VLAN between the two sites. Both sites have to have a >> different AS number. So if you want to mov

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

This same issue happened in Los Angeles a number of years ago, but for IPv4 and v6. They need to setup sane BGP timers, and/or advocate the use of BFD for BGP sessions both customer facing and internal. Ryan On Nov 15 2020, at 5:58 pm, Matt Corallo wrote: > Has anyone else experienced iss

Re: Asus wifi AP re-writing DNS packets

I'm curious to know why they would add such a thing, and how you got the iptables rules from the device. Do these Asus routers provide SSH directly into the shell? Ryan On Oct 28 2020, at 11:33 am, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > Hello, > > Wondering anyone from Asus here or anyone who could c

Amazon Prime Video Contact?

, if anybody has dealt with this more recently and has had success in resolving this issue quickly, I'm all ears! Regards, -- Ryan Gard

Re: Looking for a contact at Twitter

t; ISP in the Netherlands (AS 206238). > > Our problem is that Twitter's geolocation database still situates some our > IPv4 blocks in the United Arab Emirates. This renders Twitter unusable for > some of our customers. > > We are looking for somebody that can help us with this Please contact me > outside the ML. > > Thanks in advance, > > -- Ariën > > > > > -- Ryan P Sommers ry...@rpsommers.com

Re: cheap MPLS router recommendations

It can handle a few full tables, but the performance of an MX80/MX104 is nearly the same as the EX4200 switch. Ryan On Oct 16 2020, at 4:41 pm, Tony Wicks wrote: > Well, there is always the MX104 (if you want redundancy) or MX80 if you > don’t. That will give you 80gig wire speed just

Re: Cogent Layer 2

P packets towards these three ports? > Your customers may not appreciate. You must not be familiar with JUNOS' ACL handling. This would be applied to interface lo0, which is specifically for control planes. No data plane traffic to customers would be hit. Ryan On Oct 15 2020, at 1:03 am, Saku

Re: Cogent Layer 2

tocol udp; destination-port [ 3784 3785 4784 ]; source-prefix-list bgp_hosts; } then accept; } term deny_bfd { from { protocol udp; destination-port [ 3784 3785 4784 ]; } then discard; } Ryan On Oct 14 2020, at 11:29 pm, Saku Ytti wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 09:11, Ryan Hamel (mailto

Re: Cogent Layer 2

Yep. Make sure you run BFD with your peering protocols, to catch outages very quickly. On Oct 14 2020, at 12:47 pm, Mike Hammett wrote: > I haven't heard any concerns with reliability, on-net performance (aside from > 2 gig flow limit) or other such things. Do they generally deliver well in >

Re: Cogent Layer 2

for it. Ryan On Oct 14 2020, at 11:28 am, Rod Beck wrote: > > Hibernia was offering Switched Ethernet 'everywhere' long before it had a > Layer 3 network. So I am a bit skeptical. In fact, in the 'old days' > 2006-2011 we had a nice packet over SDH service that has all the performan

Re: Cogent Layer 2

All carrier Ethernet services are tunnels provided by VPLS Psuedowire or VXLAN services. Did you really expect a VLAN to be layer 2 switched everywhere? Ryan On Oct 14 2020, at 11:03 am, Rod Beck wrote: > > I always heard this service was really Layer 3 disguised as Layer 2. > > &

Re: Cogent Layer 2

2Gbps? 5 – What is the purpose of the connection? (Internet traffic backhaul, data center connectivity, replication, extending point-of-presence, etc..) 6 – Will you be running MACSec over our L2 service? 7 – Will you need to pass multiple VLANs and/or Jumbo frames? -- Ryan On Oct 14 2020

Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939

You would get better peering from Equinix IX, which includes free HE IPv4 Peering + IPv6 Transit Ryan On Oct 13 2020, at 4:29 pm, Aaron Gould wrote: > Do y’all like HE for Internet uplink? I’m thinking about using them for > 100gig in Texas. It would be for my eyeballs ISP. We currentl

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

There is linux happening in some devices. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/evo-overview.html Ryan On Thu, Oct 8, 2020, 4:16 PM Matt Harris wrote: > Matt Harris​ > | Infrastructure Lead Engineer > 816‑256‑5446 > | Direct > Looking for somethi

Re: IPv4 Mismanagement

I have the same thing with a service that was disconnected a couple years ago. Four IP blocks of /24 size are still swipped to us and we’re announcing them. I don’t put any customers on them and just use them for temporary things for fear that some day someone will want them back. > On Oct

Re: BFD for routes learned trough Route-servers in IXPs

is issue doesn't seem important enough to warrant significant action. For transport, colo a switch that can handles BGP announcements, routes, and ARPs, then transport that across with only 2 MACs and internal point-to-point IP assignments. Ryan On Sep 15 2020, at 5:55 pm, Douglas Fischer wro

Re: Cogent emails

All I did was express interest a few years ago and ever since then they’ve called and emailed me pretty regularly. Just got one yesterday. I’m probably on the fourth sales guy now since I first asked. Ryan Wilkins > On Sep 14, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Jesse DuPont > wrote: > > We sta

Re: Level3 DNS Issues

persists... Thanks again... Ryan O'Shea | Director of Technology | VCP6 - RHCE CISP 419.724.5314 office 419.810.0270 cell 419.724.3547 24x7 support From: Rob Duffy Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 9:59 AM To: Ryan O’Shea Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level3 DNS

Level3 DNS Issues

Is anyone experiencing timeouts when querying 209.244.0.3? Thanks, Ryan O’Shea

Re: Issue with Noction IRP default setting (Was: BGP route hijack by AS10990)

encourage best practice? They decided RPKI validation was a good thing. Ryan On Aug 1 2020, at 4:12 pm, Matt Erculiani wrote: > Ryan, > > The reason Noction is being singled out here as opposed to other BGP speakers > is that it inherently breaks several BGP protection mechanism

Re: Issue with Noction IRP default setting (Was: BGP route hijack by AS10990)

rdware it is running on, to BGP peers, and add more knobs into policy creation to match said values, and take action appropriately. That would be useful in getting around vendor specific issues, as well as belt & suspenders protection. Ryan On Aug 1 2020, at 9:58 am, Job Snijders wrote: > On Sat,

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

/ To the OP - I express my appreciation for acknowledging and adjusting the language used in your survey. Regards, - Ryan (past NANOG Program Committee Member) On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:08 PM J. Hellenthal wrote: > Guess we all better start rewriting all of the documentation out there > b

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >