Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

Thanks Tom, Yeah my test points VM's where all FreeBSD 10.3/11.0, so I decided to randomize some of them and added a CentOS on my Telia peer (10Gbps), and start getting normal performance from GCLD ( In the 500Mbps/500Mbps range ) PS: Even weirderer(tm) The *BSD VMs always

Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

Just did a quick test from a personal VM, no throughput difference over direct peering, public IX, or transit. GCP might have a bottleneck in your case though, might be a good idea to ask them. Also, I'll have what Gordon is having. On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Gordon Cook

Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

Hi Alain and all the rest I het it now no offense and alain no harm done and all of nanog thank you and i will continue observing as i have since 1995 thank you allagin PS and BTW i am interested in CLOUD :-) thanks once more > On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Alain Hebert

Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

Hi, Yes Stephen, we're talking the usual like GTT... And no latency wise they're about the same. In the 35ms range. But I still can't figure out the 10 x drop, that level of latency alone cannot be the factor. ( And Gordy... what?!? ) - Alain Hebert

Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

please accept my apologies this response was totally out of context > On Jun 16, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Gordon Cook wrote: > > > i also see now that you are a guru rinpoche as wlell > > but with valerie home any minute i must stop > > will come back though >> On Jun 16,

Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

i also see now that you are a guru rinpoche as wlell but with valerie home any minute i must stop will come back though > On Jun 16, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Stephen Fulton wrote: > > Alain, > > When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are >

Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

Alain, When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you reach through "normal peering" have higher latency than through TorIX? -- Stephen On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote: Hi, Anyone aware of