Sounds like someone has more time to talk/type about political dogma with
random strangers than the purpose of this mailing list.
- J
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:58 AM J. Hellenthal
wrote:
> Yeah he did the same dolt act to me to. Just a really bored dolt looking
> for nonsense with a crush on AO
estroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> The sender, therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or
>>> omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of
>>> e-mail transmission.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
for any errors or
>> omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of
>> e-mail transmission.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message -
>> From: Lorell Hathcock
>> Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM
Yeah he did the same dolt act to me to. Just a really bored dolt looking for
nonsense with a crush on AOC.
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 00:40, Javier J wrote:
>
>
you too, why are you emailing me?
I didn't ask anyone to contact me off list.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Sam Silvester
wrote:
> Archives are browsable by anybody. How do you expect to keep political
> types out of the discussion?
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:36 am, Javier J
> wrote:
>
>>
rrors or omissions in the
> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Lorell Hathcock
> Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG??
I couldn't agree more.
If I want to talk politics, I will go to other places. I use this mailing
list to talk about things relevant to technology and operation of networks
in North American and other places.
- Javier
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> javier,
>
> I concur. Wh
I find this comment insulting.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:40 PM Lorell Hathcock wrote:
> A-woman!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Lorell Hathcock
>
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J wrote:
>
>
> I agree 100%.
>
> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
> appreciate
javier,
I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to “reign in”
our discussions on political grounds!
-mel beckman
On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J wrote:
I agree 100%.
I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
appreciate is t
A-woman!
Sincerely,
Lorell Hathcock
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J wrote:
>
>
> I agree 100%.
>
> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
> appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list
> because of someone's behavior
I agree 100%.
I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list
because of someone's behavior.
- Javier
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis wrote:
> There's a world of difference between "d
There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."
The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain
what cause
The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is
the policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:28 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> wrote:
> And either way, what is the policy about forwarding list email to someone who
> is not on the list?
>
> If you are posting to NANOG under the impression that your
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
wrote:
> And either way, what is the policy about forwarding list email to someone
> who is not on the list?
>
If you are posting to NANOG under the impression that your email will only
be seen by network engineers and that it will never be
Either Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' office is on the NANOG list or someone is
forwarding NANOG email to AOC's press office (in which case either spoofed as
the original sender or AOC's office sends an ack to every email address it can
find)..as I received this auto-ack in response to my email to to
16 matches
Mail list logo
