Subject: Re: Mail to Microsoft being falsely marked as spam/bulk
>
> Yes. Or just sending new stuff in the old ticket. (Apparently, you get
> a different guy each time, keep trying until you find one who is
> willing to act.)
>
That didn't help either.
First, they asked for a p
that the issue (mails junked) was
caused by forwarding spam and that I should confirm to Outlooks
Technical Standards. After confirming this, they told me that they can't
do anything, they have no liberty to discuss the source of the block and
that I should take care of complying to Hotmails Technicals
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:18:21PM +0100,
Bjoern Franke via NANOG wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
> I had the same issue in which they were unable (or unwillig) to resolve it,
> and wouldn't have "the liberty to discuss the source of the block". Creating
> a new ticket some weeks
being falsely marked as spam/bulk
Hi folks,
I'm having an issue with Microsoft email filtering, where it is flagging
messages from a private mail server as spam, with an SCL of 9 and a BCL of 7,
resulting in it being sent to the Junk folder.
We are not seeing this issue with Google's mai
Hi,
"Unfortunately, after reviewing the information you provided and in
compliance with our mail policies, we are unable to offer immediate
resolve for your deliverability issue."
Will give them credit though for the timing in their response, received
it a few hours later after
I tried this, got a scripted response:
"Unfortunately, after reviewing the information you provided and in
compliance with our mail policies, we are unable to offer immediate resolve
for your deliverability issue."
Will give them credit though for the timing in their response, received it
a few
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:07:39PM +1100,
Christopher Hawker wrote
a message of 132 lines which said:
> If there is anyone from Microsoft around that can look into mail issues,
> could you please reach out to me off-list? Or if anyone has any
> ideas/suggestions as to how to resolve this, I'd
Hi folks,
I'm having an issue with Microsoft email filtering, where it is flagging
messages from a private mail server as spam, with an SCL of 9 and a BCL of
7, resulting in it being sent to the Junk folder.
We are not seeing this issue with Google's mail environment (being filtered
to junk
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, at 14:40, John Curran wrote:
> Thanks for raising this… here’s how ARIN Meeting Invites are handled –
>
> A series of announcements about registration and related reminders are
> sent to arin-announce and published on www.arin.net, including:
>> Registration Open – 12-16
signed up for whatever that mailing list is and
if I did I wouldn’t subscribe to it on those addresses. Furthermore, I am not
seeing an unsubscribe button on either email. That makes both messages spam.
Considering I’ve never received messages like those from ARIN on those
addresses, I’ll give
C address and one to the abuse POC
> address for my ASN.
>
> As far as I am aware, I never signed up for whatever that mailing list is
> and if I did I wouldn’t subscribe to it on those addresses. Furthermore, I
> am not seeing an unsubscribe button on either email. That ma
As far as I am aware, I never signed up for whatever that mailing list is
> and if I did I wouldn’t subscribe to it on those addresses. Furthermore, I
> am not seeing an unsubscribe button on either email. That makes both
> messages spam.
>
> Considering I’ve never received messag
is and
if I did I wouldn’t subscribe to it on those addresses. Furthermore, I am not
seeing an unsubscribe button on either email. That makes both messages spam.
Considering I’ve never received messages like those from ARIN on those
addresses, I’ll give ARIN the benefit of the doubt and say someone
> was really, *really* negligent here, especially as it's *known* that email is
> not a reliable method of communication, and if you aren't requiring an
> acknowledgement that's on *you*).
>
> --
> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law
> CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Poli
as it's *known* that email is not a
reliable method of communication, and if you aren't requiring an
acknowledgement that's on *you*).
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law
CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Au
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 7:33 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we
> say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems,
> consider the risk:
>
> https://www.washingtonpo
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:28 AM Jawaid Bazyar
wrote:
> "flawlessly map IP address to GPS coordinates"
Thanks, I needed a good hearty belly laugh to start off the day today. ;P
*hint*
It's easier to fix the spam problem than it is to map IP addresses to
physical locations in
t;
wrote:
They should demand a full refund.
On August 23, 2022 at 18:33 b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we
> say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems,
s what ended up in
> the sender's spam folder which the sender never checked... until later when
> they started the investigation. No mail was dropped on the floor by
> anti-spam.
>
> There is still a place for things to be formally delivered on a piece of
> paper. Sure, send the email for quick
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:50:22PM -0700, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> On 8/23/22 18:33, William Herrin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we
> > say, overzealous about preventing spam from enteri
ded up in
the sender's spam folder which the sender never checked... until later when
they started the investigation. No mail was dropped on the floor by
anti-spam.
There is still a place for things to be formally delivered on a piece of
paper. Sure, send the email for quick notification, but also b
On 8/23/22 18:33, William Herrin wrote:
Hello,
To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we
say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems,
Sigh. They are substantially less zealous about preventing spam from
leaving their systems.
--
Jay
They should demand a full refund.
On August 23, 2022 at 18:33 b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we
> say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems,
> consider the ris
that you should
just trust anything that comes from their address but that's how we end up with
email spoofing. The agencies need to ensure they have the right setup in place
to avoid ending up in spam and also ensure they are following up in some form,
especially when its to do with child safety
, August 24, 2022 8:14:16 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: email spam
Sorry about the bad examples, but I remember contacting both about issues with
SPF multiple times. They both have seemed have to fixed things at least
searching my logs for the last week. Most
t; septa.org <http://septa.org/>, the Pennsylvania train authority, and
> easypassnj.com <http://easypassnj.com/>, the New Jersey transit toll
> collectors about invalid SPF records for years, and they literally don’t give
> a shit. If they say to put it in spam, well than
Bill,
Not only that, did they even follow their own rules, I’ve been fighting with
septa.org, the Pennsylvania train authority, and easypassnj.com, the New Jersey
transit toll collectors about invalid SPF records for years, and they literally
don’t give a shit. If they say to put it in spam
Without saying why the mail was blocked (dumb content filter looking for porn?
a spamhaus listing because the police server was hacked? something else?)
that’s not going to help too much.
I’ve been spam filtering stuff at large providers since the late 90s and it
never gets any easier to block
Hello,
To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we
say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems,
consider the risk:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/08/23/fairfax-county-counselor-solicitation-minor/
"Chesterfield County police
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Martin
> Hannigan
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 11:44 PM
> To: Omar Haider
> Cc: nanog
> Subject: Re: [External] Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
>
>
>
> WARNING: This messag
> *Subject:* Re: [External] Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
>
>
>
> WARNING: This message originated outside of Ford Motor Company. Use
> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Omar,
>
>
>
So what ever happened to the threatener? Was he caught?
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Martin
Hannigan
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 11:44 PM
To: Omar Haider
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
WARNING: This message originated outside of Ford
Hi Omar,
This is likely a hoax. Probably a “joe job” - making it appear as someone
innocent is responsible. Its good to share this info to raise network
operators awareness since even if it is fake its concerning how many
received it.
I’ll leave it to the pros here to tell us if we shouldn’t
I put what we received up on pastebin entirely with headers (and redacted
our info).
https://pastebin.com/kLjPm8Nk
Warm regards,
-M<
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Radu-Adrian Feurdean <
na...@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, at 16:00, Hunter Fuller via NANOG wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, at 16:00, Hunter Fuller via NANOG wrote:
> We have a distinct abuse address (not just abuse@) and that is where
> the messages were sent.
>
> We didn't receive the bomb threat ones. We only received the (somewhat
> more amusing) messages entitled "Your network has been PWNED"
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:20, Kain, Becki (.) wrote:
> The thing is, who is in office to care? Oh wait, guess equipment *is*
> important
>
>
For how long did you keep up with the evacuation of the equipment? :-)
be detonated".
> > >
> > > Is this being seen on a wide spread e-mail blast to the RIR
> > contacts,
> > > or am I just unlucky to know like 6 other data center folks who
> have
> > > also gotten this e-mail?
> > >
t;
> Is this being seen on a wide spread e-mail blast to the RIR
contacts,
> or am I just unlucky to know like 6 other data center folks who have
> also gotten this e-mail?
>
> It seems like a very odd/bizarre spam/threat campaign which would
> carr
The thing is, who is in office to care? Oh wait, guess equipment *is* important
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Sadiq Saif
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:11 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
WARNING: This message originated
acenters asking for $5,000 USD
> > or the "bomb will be detonated".
> >
> > Is this being seen on a wide spread e-mail blast to the RIR contacts,
> > or am I just unlucky to know like 6 other data center folks who have
> > also gotten this e-mail?
> >
>
ky to know like 6 other data center folks who have
also gotten this e-mail?
It seems like a very odd/bizarre spam/threat campaign which would
carry significant jail time.
And now I REALLY want to get moving on a service to drop a drone on
spammers. (Active Countermeasures!)
Mile
f wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, at 08:40, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> > Are you contacting your LEO? Or is this so spammy just hit delete?
> >
> > I feel like even spam chosen poorly comes with consequences.
>
> I hit delete after I saw Frantech had already report
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, at 08:40, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> Are you contacting your LEO? Or is this so spammy just hit delete?
>
> I feel like even spam chosen poorly comes with consequences.
I hit delete after I saw Frantech had already reported it the FBI as per their
website.
Whoever this
10/19/21 8:32 AM
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: "Nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
Yup, same here
Travis
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
Shawn L via NANOG
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 7:25 AM
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subj
Yes, it's from the operator of bytefend and they have been sending numerous
threatening emails for months.
You can check the statement from the victim Frantech from the link below:
https://frantech.ca/
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:34 PM Ray Bellis wrote:
>
>
> On 19/10/2021 13:29, Travis
On 19/10/2021 13:29, Travis Garrison wrote:
> Yup, same here
and here.
For now we're just ignoring it, but if anyone wants to quote us (ISC, a
DNS root server operator) in the event of law enforcement action please
let me know.
Ray
I got one and I don’t have a datacenter. I’d better check my pockets….
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+milt=net2atlanta@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
Travis Garrison
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:29 AM
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting the 'spam
Are you contacting your LEO? Or is this so spammy just hit delete?
I feel like even spam chosen poorly comes with consequences.
On 10/19/21 8:29 AM, Travis Garrison wrote:
Yup, same here
Travis
*From:* NANOG *On
Behalf Of *Shawn L via NANOG
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2021 7:25 AM
Yup, same here
Travis
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
Shawn L via NANOG
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 7:25 AM
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
we received it as well
-Original Message-
From: "Matt H
we received it as well
-Original Message-
From: "Matt Hoppes"
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:21am
To: "North American Network Operators' Group"
Subject: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?
I've now heard from several operators - our selves included -
other data center folks who have also
gotten this e-mail?
It seems like a very odd/bizarre spam/threat campaign which would
carry significant jail time.
On 2021-09-29 01:03, Tim Harman via NANOG wrote:
[..]
{11:58}~ ➭ dig @194.0.41.1 test.tk
; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u5-Debian <<>> @194.0.41.1 test.tk
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
A traceroute with a source IP would be sooo
Hi,
If anyone has contact details for the operators of the .tk TLD, could
you contact me off-list please?
We are unable to contact the authoritive NS for this TLD - it seems our
range is on a blacklist or they have some odd route back to us that
isn't working.
Thus our customers can't
y a stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
> On Jan 13, 2021, at 19:18, Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> Tons, and we are litigating them. They are spamming most of the
> addresses in several of our domains.
>
> -mel via cell
>
> On Jan 13, 2021, at 2:18 PM, M
that service reported the NANOG list as SPAM to the
DoNotPay service.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
From: "Robert Webb"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Wednesday, Janu
> In short, someone that uses that service reported the NANOG list as SPAM to
>> the DoNotPay service.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> Midwest-IX
>> http://w
DoNotPay is a spammer and by all accounts a scammer too. They violate the US
CAN SPAM Act by not including a clear opt-out mechanism (their Manage
Preferences link leads to an “unsubscribe” form that in reality signs people up
to your service!) I’ve also repeatedly ask that they unsubscribe all
that service reported the NANOG list as SPAM to the
DoNotPay service.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
From: "Robert Webb"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Wednesday, January
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:06:15PM -0500, Robert Webb wrote:
> Anyone else getting spam from DoNotPay everytime they send an email to the
> list?
This is solvable by permanently blocking all traffic from Mailgun in
your MTA. This should be a good start and may suffice:
mailgu
FYI geek team I received it too.
Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE
6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
CEO
b...@6by7.net
"The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the
world.”
FCC License KJ6FJJ
Sent from my iPhone via RFC1149.
> On Jan 13, 2021, at 4:28 PM, Sabri
- On Jan 13, 2021, at 2:22 PM, Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
Hi Bryan,
> What you can do is when you notice these, email geeks@nanog with the full
> email including headers immediately. We can then cross check it against new
> signups. I wish there was a more scientific way to
On 1/13/21 5:06 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
> Anyone else getting spam from DoNotPay everytime they send an email to the
> list?
>
> I have not sent anything in a while until my ATT email and now I am getting
> this on every new email I send to the list.
yup, I've spent a few hours to
On 1/13/2021 3:12 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I have reached out to the list admins and the donotpay people and
they're working on it.
In short, someone that uses that service reported the NANOG list as SPAM
to the DoNotPay service.
Wow, someone needs to be whacked upside the head pretty hard
s,
Sabri
- On Jan 13, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
> Anyone else getting spam from DoNotPay everytime they send an email to the
> list?
> I have not sent anything in a while until my ATT email and now I am getting
> this
> on every new email I send to the
I have reached out to the list admins and the donotpay people and they're
working on it.
In short, someone that uses that service reported the NANOG list as SPAM to the
DoNotPay service.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http
oh is that where it's coming from. yes. my filter now zaps it.
Mike
On 1/13/21 2:06 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
Anyone else getting spam from DoNotPay everytime they send an email to
the list?
I have not sent anything in a while until my ATT email and now I am
getting this on every new email I
Anyone else getting spam from DoNotPay everytime they send an email to the
list?
I have not sent anything in a while until my ATT email and now I am getting
this on every new email I send to the list.
[image: Alternate text]
*You’re almost there! Sign up once to unlock lifetime protection
Hundred Meg, Ten Gig, One erm...?
Maybe harder to create vernacular for.
> On 2020-11-23, at 14:35, Mark Tinka wrote:
> […]
>
> Given that Tbps is still relatively uncommon in many operator networks, it's
> not uncommon to hear people say Megabit and Gigabit with no problem, but say
>
please remove me from list
Original Message
Subject: [SPAM] Re: plea for comcast/sprint handoff debug help
From: Alex Band <a...@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Thu, October 29, 2020 2:14 pm
To: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THE LISTTHANK YOU
Original Message
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter
From: colin johnston <col...@gt86car.org.uk>
Date: Thu, October 29, 2020 11:12 am
To: Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.com>
Cc: NANOG <
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Looks like this recent spammer has been removed from the list. They were
moderated, and using the email address From: or known users.
Thanks,
- --
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
- On Sep 21, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
Hi,
> What's happening here is a subscription comes in from a valid email bot using
> gmail or $BIGHOST (google doesn't give af)
I'm old enough to remember the Usenet Death Penalty. That used to be pretty
effective
in
On 9/21/20 7:28 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Can we please send this stuff to the admins and not the whole list?
Both the list admin account in the headers and the ge...@nanog.org is
monitored and responded to. If you don't get a reply, you all have my email
too.
What's happening here is a
Hi Randy,
> On 22 Sep 2020, at 00:14, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them
>
> :0
> * ^From:.*@csvwebsupport.com
> | /usr/bin/mail -s 'Screw You' dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com <
> ~/screw-you.txt
I’m using different technique. I like tarpitting such
> I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them
:0
* ^From:.*@csvwebsupport.com
| /usr/bin/mail -s 'Screw You' dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com <
~/screw-you.txt
Job,
I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them, and my
Postfix is no longer taking submission from the IP from which they
were sent - 216.176.196.72.
They seem to be using correct sending host according to SPF
record (host spamtitan.csvwebsupport.com validates using
is subject taken
from last e-mail.
I understand there’s need to connect people in hard, COVID times,
but I doubt automated spam sender has good intentions with that regard ;)
So.. somebody is scrapping this list to feed their spamming lists :/
Been happening to me since several weeks into lockdown
coincidence, but
> today when I got it, it’s hardly one ;)
>
> Topic is '[#WHB-257-41491]: Re: XX’ where is subject taken
> from last e-mail.
>
> I understand there’s need to connect people in hard, COVID times,
> but I doubt automated spam sender has good intentions
is '[#WHB-257-41491]: Re: XX’ where is subject taken
from last e-mail.
I understand there’s need to connect people in hard, COVID times,
but I doubt automated spam sender has good intentions with that regard ;)
So.. somebody is scrapping this list to feed their spamming lists :/
—
./
there’s need to connect people in hard, COVID times,
but I doubt automated spam sender has good intentions with that regard ;)
So.. somebody is scrapping this list to feed their spamming lists :/
—
./
>
> I treat it as a back-end mailbox for my own smtp server. 100% of email
> that reaches my gmail
box without going to another address at my mail server first is spam.
I used a similar flow a few years ago that worked until I made the mistake
of signing into some service us
anticipated traffic volume.
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 13:33, William Herrin wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I've noticed something odd. When I lived in Virginia, I started
> receiving email directly to my gmail box from my U.S. Representative.
> Unsolicited spam from Congressmen is nothing ne
my gmail
box without going to another address at my mail server first is spam.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin
b...@herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/
On 14/09/2020 18:13, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them.
Aha! You're the reason they don't stop! :p
--
Tom
he addresses I give out; my gmail
>> box's address which I don't. ...
>
> It's strange but I think it's not typical. I have given tagged
> addresses to lots of political candidates and am getting buckets
> of mail, like five a day from each of the presidential campaigns
> t
I think it's not typical. I have given tagged
addresses to lots of political candidates and am getting buckets
of mail, like five a day from each of the presidential campaigns
to those addresses.
I am getting no political spam to my gmail box, and do not recall any
that wasn't clearly due to nitwits s
so they can spam
you all over again. I made the mistake of donating to a party backed candidate
about a decade ago, and the cesspool of political entities associated with that
party continue to email and text me every single cycle. Unless I start suing,
or change all my contact info, there's
, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:33 AM William Herrin wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've noticed something odd. When I lived in Virginia, I started
> receiving email directly to my gmail box from my U.S. Representative.
> Unsolicited spam from Congressmen is nothing new but it was a little
> odd that t
Howdy,
I've noticed something odd. When I lived in Virginia, I started
receiving email directly to my gmail box from my U.S. Representative.
Unsolicited spam from Congressmen is nothing new but it was a little
odd that they found my gmail box (which I don't give out) and not one
of the hundreds
To: "David Guo"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:13:37 PM
Subject: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails
We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. The sales
emails stopped. Seems to be about the only effective method.
Simon
On Mon Sep 14, 2020
I tell them to hit me up once they have direct peering with HE.net.
Haven’t heard from them since.
-Mike
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 10:15, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
> We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. The sales
> emails stopped. Seems to be about the only effective
We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. The sales
emails stopped. Seems to be about the only effective method.
Simon
On Mon Sep 14, 2020 at 05:07:28PM +, David Guo via NANOG wrote:
> Yes, every week
>
> Proof
>
> https://vip1.loli.net/2020/09/15/bq3lHGuvNRkW9YS.jpg
A guy signs up to a mailing list. Years later he leaves the company. The
boss says hey lets forward the mail to support so somebody can reply if
something important is received.
And here we are.
man. 13. jan. 2020 08.37 skrev Mark Tinka :
> Been getting these too.
>
> Looks like someone from
Been getting these too.
Looks like someone from shopee.sg signed their support e-mail address up
on NANOG, and every time one posts to the list, you get this.
Mark.
On 10/Jan/20 20:17, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> FYI, this is a new one for me
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: *Shopee
FYI, this is a new one for me
-- Forwarded message -
From: Shopee SG Support
Date: Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 12:10 PM
Subject: [Request Received] Re: De-bogonising 2a10::/12
To: r...@tajvar.io
Hi Ross Tajvar,
Thank you for contacting Shopee!
Your request has been received and is
On 10/22/19 5:41 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
I'm guessing -- because spammer Ben Reynolds (breyno...@cytranet.com)
wrote to me about voice/data services -- that it's possible they've
been scraping addresses from here.
This exact issue received exhaustive coverage over on the Outages
Seems likely that they scraped the list, yes.
Two more names to my Never Do Business With list I guess. :)
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 8:43 AM Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> I'm guessing -- because spammer Ben Reynolds (breyno...@cytranet.com)
> wrote to me about voice/data services -- that it's possible
On 10/22/19 8:41 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
I'm guessing -- because spammer Ben Reynolds (breyno...@cytranet.com)
wrote to me about voice/data services -- that it's possible they've
been scraping addresses from here.
Yes, mine came to my voiceops tagged address.
--
Brandon Martin
I'm guessing -- because spammer Ben Reynolds (breyno...@cytranet.com)
wrote to me about voice/data services -- that it's possible they've
been scraping addresses from here.
---rsk
Oddly enough, I created a Z Org for legacy resources and got hit up on
linked-in by IPv4 brokers as well as some spam from Cogent.
Annoying.
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 09:29, Tim Burke wrote:
>
> Done, Sir. Thanks.
>
> Tim Burke
> t...@burke.us
>
>> On Sat, Aug 3, 201
1 - 100 of 783 matches
Mail list logo
