We recently purchased new IP addresses from ARIN, with plans on using one of
them for our external and internal email delivery. We set up a reverse lookup
and a SPF record for the newly purchased IP to prevent being classified as
spam. We tested the functionality of the PTR and SPF record
Anyone have a contact at mlb.com that could help resolve an ip geolocation
issue? (Networking, db.. or someone who can help find the right folks)
Alternatively, anyone know who mlb.com buys geolocation data from? It's
related to their baseball game streaming/subscription service.
Whitelisting
- Forwarded message from Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net -
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:25:13 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net
To: liberationtech liberationt...@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric Internet
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Niels Bakker niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
I don't know of any IXP that does this. Industry standard is as you and
others wrote before: the 5-minute counter difference on all customer-facing
ports, publishing both input and output bps and pps.
I guess MRTG is
On Sep 18, 2013, at 9:07 AM, NANOG na...@abcsupply.com wrote:
We recently purchased new IP addresses from ARIN
No, actually, you didn't. You were assigned the use of the addresses, based on
need. Just as a radio station does not purchase spectrum.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four3
So iOS 7 just came out, here's the spike in our graphs going to our ISP
here at McGill, anyone else noticing a big spike?
[image: internet-sw1 - Traffic - Te0/7 - To Internet1-srp (IR Canet) -
TenGigabitEthernet0/7]
Zachary McGibbon
My experience in the past is that it can take a good amount of time for ATT to
remove you from their black list. It's been as short as 24 - 48 hours and as
long as a couple weeks and required follow up contact with support. They're a
big company and they get a lot of requests. I've not dealt
LOL, we'll move the taps one layer down ...
-J
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
- Forwarded message from Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net -
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:25:13 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net
To: liberationtech
Our mail server IP address is 74.112.99.25. Is it possible they
are blocking us based on old information from the previous IP
address block owner?
Quite likely, yes.
https://www.arin.net/resources/whowas/
Found it to be of use for this type of question. Registration required.
Hmm.. seems my image was stripped. I'm trying imgur for the first time so
here's our graph:
http://i.imgur.com/OrtjJXF.jpg
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Zachary McGibbon
zachary.mcgibbon+na...@gmail.com wrote:
So iOS 7 just came out, here's the spike in our graphs going to our ISP
here
I would say the first step is to find an immediate workaround for your end
users - maybe bring up a VM on AWS or some other cloud provider to use as
an SMTP relay while you work out the blacklist issue. If you run into
blacklist issues after that, you may want to take a very close look at your
Our local Akamai cluster has pegged it's 1G uplink a few times, and we
are hitting our 1G Equinix IX link pretty hard as well.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Ben Bartsch uwcable...@gmail.com wrote:
We are seeing Akamai traffic up about 100-300% since noon CDT. Seeing
similar increased from
We are seeing Akamai traffic up about 100-300% since noon CDT. Seeing
similar increased from our participants - colleges and universities mainly.
Ours is not so much Akamai as Limelight. Spiked to about 7 times normal.
sam
Large US MSO.
Our overall traffic is up about 20% compared to this time yesterday, which
equates to ~120Gbps. Mostly Akamai.
-Phil
On 9/18/13 1:38 PM, Zachary McGibbon zachary.mcgibbon+na...@gmail.com
wrote:
So iOS 7 just came out, here's the spike in our graphs going to our ISP
here
We are seeing Akamai traffic up about 100-300% since noon CDT. Seeing
similar increased from our participants - colleges and universities mainly.
AS32440
-ben
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
ach...@forthnetgroup.gr wrote:
We also noticed an interesting spike (+
Various EU IXPs are showing spikes of various sizes at the moment
LINX: http://cl.ly/image/3n1521432S1R
LONAP: http://cl.ly/image/0W2K0q3p3f2h
AMS-IX: http://cl.ly/image/0r0J2b331E2A
DE-CIX: http://cl.ly/image/0D1B181N103A
Akamai (who I believe Apple use for at least some of their CDN delivery)
Do you guys not have a local akamai node?? Seems like maybe @gilmore could
help you out, that's a pretty intense surge for software updates. Our
stuff gets hit, but nothing like this (our networks usually don't exceed
40mbps over satellite).
The MSO I used to work at had a fairly large akamai
We also noticed an interesting spike (+ ~40%), mostly in akamai.
The same happened on previous iOS too.
--
Tassos
Zachary McGibbon wrote on 18/9/2013 20:38:
So iOS 7 just came out, here's the spike in our graphs going to our ISP
here at McGill, anyone else noticing a big spike?
[image:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
We also noticed an interesting spike (+ ~40%), mostly in akamai.
The same happened on previous iOS too.
I see it here, too. At its peak, our traffic levels were roughly double
what we would see on a normal weekday.
jms
Zachary McGibbon
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Timothy Metzinger wrote:
Here's a thought. Would it be possible to set up a process where ARIN, as
part of reselling IP addresses, either issues a certificate of transfer that
the new owner can use to prove to the ISPs that he's a new owner and not the
old evil spammer, or
* bickn...@ufp.org (Leo Bicknell) [Wed 18 Sep 2013, 19:23 CEST]:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Niels Bakker niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
I don't know of any IXP that does this. Industry standard is as
you and others wrote before: the 5-minute counter difference on
all customer-facing ports,
On 9/18/13 4:46 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 6:41 PM, Timothy Metzinger wrote:
Here's a thought. Would it be possible to set up a process where
ARIN, as
part of reselling IP addresses, either issues a certificate of
transfer that
the new owner can use to prove to the ISPs that
On 18/09/2013 18:23, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Serious question, at an IXP shouldn't IN = OUT nearly perfectly?
if you host multicast on your unicast peering lan, then this will be
affected by the unicast:multicast ratio and the number of recipient ports.
Most networks which support multicast will
* ra...@psg.com (Randy Bush) [Wed 18 Sep 2013, 04:39 CEST]:
somehow, a serious case of testosterone poisoning combined with insane
goal drift has hit a number of the large european exchanges. instead of
the goal being how well they serve their local communities, they have
gone wild with sleazy
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and ARIN used to contact us when they recycled IP
space. We always removed when contacted by ARIN.
Andrew
ARIN hasnt contacted us for this since i've been involved with the ahbl
for ~5 years.
just a FYI.
Well, it'd seem we
Ding ding ding! And that's why honest IXPs graph both, to show that
they have no packet loss on their inter-switch links.
It depends on what is being measured. At TorIX we'll see deviations
between in/out on our aggregate graph. As we combine all peer ports to
form the aggregate graph,
On 9/18/2013 7:15 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
On 9/18/13 5:07 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and ARIN used to contact us when they recycled IP
space. We always removed when contacted by ARIN.
Andrew
ARIN hasnt contacted us for this
On 18/09/2013 23:55, Niels Bakker wrote:
Ding ding ding! And that's why honest IXPs graph both, to show that they
have no packet loss on their inter-switch links.
If in out, it's not necessarily inter-switch packet loss. The difference
between the two will also include packet loss for
On 9/18/2013 7:30 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 7:15 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
On 9/18/13 5:07 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and ARIN used to contact us when they
recycled IP
space. We always removed when contacted by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/18/13 6:10 PM, David Miller wrote:
On 9/18/2013 7:30 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 7:15 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
On 9/18/13 5:07 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/18/13 6:10 PM, David Miller wrote:
On 9/18/2013 7:30 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 7:15 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
On 9/18/13 5:07 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and
On 9/18/2013 8:16 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Those also are statistics not actual IP block numbers being
deallocated/allocated.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment:
somehow, a serious case of testosterone poisoning combined with insane
goal drift has hit a number of the large european exchanges. instead of
the goal being how well they serve their local communities, they have
gone wild with sleazy means of having traffic contests, doing really
sick
Quite unfortunate..
These days, when allocated 'new' IPV4 space you really have to do a little
homework to make sure it 'clean'.
I would suggest that you run your CIDR block through
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/.
IF it's mostly clean and not on hardcore lists such as SpamHaus ROKSO,
On 9/18/2013 8:16 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
On 9/18/13 6:10 PM, David Miller wrote:
On 9/18/2013 7:30 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 7:15 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
On 9/18/13 5:07 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and ARIN
This is pathetic. ARIN is supposed to be working as a steward of this
IP space. When you have policies that make it more difficult to use the
IP space this isn't even remotely close to stewardship. It's pathetic,
Unfortunately, a surprising number of new IP space owners turn out
to be the
you gotta love the amsix hkg charlie foxtrot.
and how is that working out financially for the amsix members,
the folk in the amsterdam area the amsix purportedly serves,
niels?
randy
On 9/18/2013 9:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
This is pathetic. ARIN is supposed to be working as a steward of this
IP space. When you have policies that make it more difficult to use the
IP space this isn't even remotely close to stewardship. It's pathetic,
Unfortunately, a surprising number of
In message 523a6203.8090...@trelane.net, Andrew D Kirch writes:
On 9/18/2013 9:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
This is pathetic. ARIN is supposed to be working as a steward of this
IP space. When you have policies that make it more difficult to use the
IP space this isn't even remotely close
Hello Everybody,
Is there anybody from Amsterdam IX here?
I have some questions about concept of IXP.
If anybody else have enough information about IXP's please give me message
off the list.
Thanks
--
Regards,
Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator
Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871
Dear Shahab,
Please conact me directly
kind regards
- Henk Steenman, AMS-IX
On 19 sep. 2013, at 07:05, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Is there anybody from Amsterdam IX here?
I have some questions about concept of IXP.
If anybody else have enough
41 matches
Mail list logo
