Perhaps it would be more efficient to hold off on the patch until more
people have provided feedback, and until we've decided it in more detail.
I'd hate to see your efforts go to waste ...
My 0.02 PLN:
1. I don't think merging can be done in a generic way (neither on xml level
nor at the
3. Maybe we should start by implementing it the simple way: Make
includes
and excludes support filesets (both referenced and nested):
fileset basedir=dir.a
includes file=aaa.txt /
includes fileset=r1 /
includes
fileset basedir=dir.b
BTW. Can you have this? (both reference a named fileset and re-define it ?)
fileset id=aaa refid=aaa
includes name=*.* /
/fileset
Jarek
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development
BTW. Can you have this? (both reference a named fileset and re-define it
?)
fileset id=aaa refid=aaa
includes name=*.* /
/fileset
Jarek
Not in current implementation. I dont like it much - using both id and refid
is little opaque...
Better to introduce what you suggest in previous
Not in current implementation. I dont like it much - using both id and
refid
is little opaque...
Better to introduce what you suggest in previous mail:
fileset id=aaa
includes refid=aaa /
includes name=*.* /
/fileset
To be more readable, I would:
1. Make fileset fail on attempts
I think this is sufficient in 99.9% scenarios so if we don't find merge be
useful we could always implement this [I have it in some state already]
Should such implementation include even excludes from referenced fileset?
I suggest the following evaluation semantics:
fileset
includes
I think this is sufficient in 99.9% scenarios so if we don't find merge be
useful we could always implement this [I have it in some state already]
Should such implementation include even excludes from referenced fileset?
I suggest the following evaluation semantics:
fileset
includes
Sorry for my previous example. The resulting fileset should be empty because
files cannot be both xxx.* and AAA.*.
Jarek
the resulting fileset is (in terms of the set algebra, + means union, -
means difference)
L1 + L2 - (L3 - L4)
so (because we're excluding almost every file but AAA.*)
-dev] types merging
Here it is. I also react to Gert's notes inline...
Also is attached mine test build script.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you think? Should I prepare patch for it?
sure. I'd like to see it.
Ian
- Original
What do you think? Should I prepare patch for it?
sure. I'd like to see it.
Ian
Martin
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching
10 matches
Mail list logo
