About the next release - I'm all for releasing what we have right now.
> Also, consider that last time the topic came up, I said the NUnit2 support
> stuff was a showstopper, and I've since fixed it (what could be fixed
> without changing NUnit itself).
I agree nunit2 is not a showstopper - but a
nant-developers, Protect Your Computer From Unwanted And Hazardous Viruses!!
Norton SystemWorks 2003 Software Suite (Promo-ROR835)
ALL FIVE - Feature-Packed Utilities For Only $39.99
! - Norton AntiVirus 2003
! - Norton Ghost 2003
! - GoBack 3 Personal Edition
! - Norton Utili
I was really calling for volunteers in areas of expertise and volunteering myself to
set an example. Of course I took one of the easy/optional tasks as I am lazy.
I am cool with the MSI Task. I will take a look at learning how it works. Of course
this is not a gate to a release.
Kevin
-O
Doc changes updated.
As for the examples, we have a problem with the VB.Net HelloWindowsForms
example. We should remove that one till we get it working. We should also
include some more, non-trivial, examples. Maybe something with multiple
build files. Anyone have any samples they would be willing
Here are the results from my dry run using the latest nightly build.
Docs:
index.html
Still refers to the .net framework as a 'release candidate'
links.html
Could to with a link to Draco.NET ;)
changelog.html
Might be easier in the long run to ditch this, and switch to auto generated
change log
Yep, I did give the Web site a once-over to add some
documentation to clear up some conceptual disconnects
that I had when I was learning the tool. And I'll be
happy to put in more time to deal with any other
documentation issues that need to be dealt with for an
0.8 release -- I'd like to hear a c
Kevin, you are correct, the only way to get this going is to have people
work on it. Assigning people tasks is a great way, but sometimes a little
challenging for projects of this nature. I'm a little hesitant to do as
everyone here is a limited volunteer. I was hoping that with a nightly build
ser
All,
I've made a change to the DeleteTask that I would like to have
reviewed/committed if you all agree with the change.
This issue I ran into was forcing a delete even if the file is read only. I
added a parameter "force" that will allow this. I also added code that would
recurse a directory a
Ian, I've included the diff -u at the end of this message (finally). Can you
review and commit this or give me access to the project? I would like to see
this in the next release. My sourceforge username is asansone.
Thanks,
-Aaron
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:43:46 +1100
From: Ian
Scott,
>
> I'm really leaning towards tossing a build out in the next day or so with
> the cvs changelog and not many more docs.
>
I'm cool with that. Let's get something rolling and, then we can put out a
.1 release with better docs, whatever.
--
Tomas Restrepo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great.
It would help if you (or really anyone) went through the last build
(http://nant.sf.net/builds) and played the role of a user. What looks out of
date, what looks like it is missing, what need to be done?
Maybe the answer is, most of it is okay; and we should roll with a release.
I'm feelin
<<
>What can we do as a community to ensure that this
>doesn't happen again?
I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer
one of the tasks Scott outlined...
>>
I think part of the problem is that it seems Scott is the only one of the
project admins that has been aro
>What can we do as a community to ensure that this
>doesn't happen again?
I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the
tasks Scott outlined...
1. Looks like Scott volunteered himself.
2. If someone feels excited about this one
3. If I may it would be
Patrice,
I don't know if this has been fixed in the latest build (I haven't looked at the
issue), but I had to actually copy my library to the NAnt\bin directory (as an
NAnt copy task) and then run the NUnit2 Tasks to make this work. Obviously this
is not an optimal solution, but it's a workaroun
Hi Scott
> 2.) ChangeLog (We need to build this by hand from the cvs changes. This is
> not a very attractive option, but I don't know of another way). If anyone
> knows how to get a list of changes from cvs since the last release (by tag
> or date) please let me know. Right now the I can do it, b
I think everyone has heard this before.
1. Someone compains about having a new release.
2. Everyone jumps up and says what needs to be done.
3. Then the threads go off onto tangents.
4. Nothing gets done.
It seems this conversation gets repeated every 2-4
months, with nothing happening.
Wh
Docs, Docs, Docs... Okay, here is what I see.
The code is very stable.
1.) I've got to make some quick changes so that we don't force the 1.0
framework, but that is pretty small.
2.) ChangeLog (We need to build this by hand from the cvs changes. This is
not a very attractive option, but I don't k
I am willing to pitch in as well. I would like to get a new release of
Nant and NAntContrib so that when they are downloaded, both will build
properly without hand-holding.
Regards,
Jay Turpin
Intel Corporation
"The only difference between a problem and a solution is that people
understand the sol
Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release
is dated 11-jun-2002 - nearly 8 months ago. Is there anything in particular
that is holding the release up? Anything that I could lend a hand to?
Cheers
-MG
---
This
Title: Message
Hi Nanters
Here goes...
Pat
-Original Message-From: Turpin, Jay
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003
18:13To: Patrice CalvéSubject: RE: [nunit-developer] Nunit
2.0 and Nant
You
may want to repost this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead.
I know th
Ah, good point. I'll try that today and see if it meets my needs.
Not sure if there is a nantcontrib list or not. I signed up for one, but
haven't gotten any mail from it since I signed up. And it appears that SF is
going through some issues with their mail archives, as sometimes I can get to
t
21 matches
Mail list logo
