On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan, do you recall the reasons for enforcing read-only on
properties in Ant ?
Do you want the full story? 8-)
The short version: it happend to be that way in Ant 1.1 by accident
and we sticked to it because the majority of people
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported,
ofcourse.
in Ant 1.5, that is. With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
dramatically.
http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/CoreTypes/custom-programming.html
for the short
compatibility). It should be straight forward to
write a filterchain implementation that does the same things filterset
does.
Perhaps Stefan Bodewig can give us some insights on how it was
implemented in Ant
filterset or filterchain?
Filterchains haven't changed much after they've been added in 1.5
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great to see that one of the driving forces
thanks
behind Ant is also interested in NAnt :)
More and longer than you think. ;-)
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=463245forum_id=863
I'd think that Ian and Gerry
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that superior documentation Ant have.
Go, tell our (Ant's) users ;-)
Stefan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003, Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We also have nant running fairly well with mono on linux.
nice.
As far as I'm aware no one has tested on Mac OSX though.
The hardest part is getting Mono for Macs. There is a fink package
for Mono 0.23 that I wouldn't recommend to
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003, Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure - just get the latest source from cvs,
latest means whatever you get when using anoncvs at sf.net 8-)
run make
patched the Makefile to avoid the mono JIT. Patch is appended.
in the basedir and let us know if it works :)
no,
Trying to chime in with a bit of experience from seeing project
migrate to the ASF.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On another note you mentioned license changes, I have always been
curious how that works/ is accomplished?
If
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unless there's a slight chance that Apache is going to accept .NET
projects :-)
At the risk of repeating myself, I'm sure that the ASF would not
reject a project just because it used .NET.
The ASF hosts projects written in C, Perl,
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003, Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that I agree with changing the license to a BSD or
Apache-style license.
As you are responding to a mail of mine, please note that I've just
explained some things about different licenses and what would be
involved
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one question about the wording though. The section
Redistribution and USE (my emphasis) in source and binary
forms. Does this mean that if I build a set of tasks and compile
them into a separate assembly, but don't ship the NAnt
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My largest concern is not that a company can use BSD-code, but
rather add core enhancements (ie: modifications/enhancements/bug
fixes to the core code) and keep those proprietary.
Yes, there is nothing inside a BSDish license
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the Ant team had the option, now that they have been out there so
long, I wonder if they would choose a sep. license for any reason.
I can only speak for myself, I wouldn't.
Ant has become as successful as it is for several
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what we need is a way of determining that NAnt is running on Mac,
so we can create a third platform for Mac...
No, what you need is a way of determining whether you can use mono or
have to fall back to mint. AFAIU mono is only
On 14 Oct 2003, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I assume adding a mint config in addition to
NAnt.Console.exe.config.linux
I was obviously looking at an out-of-date Makefile, sorry.
Stefan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Tom Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IANAL
If and when, Nant chooses to migrate to a different license,
it will have to handle the copyrights of the contributers.
IANAL either, but what you say is 100% the same that I've seen happen
in similar cases for other projects.
At
Hi,
as you are new to this list, Alex, let me introduce myself to you
quickly.
I'm not a NAnt developer, but rather - a bit like you - a visitor from
a very similar product. I'm one of the developers of Apache Ant, the
product that inspired NAnt's birth.
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Alex Kipman [EMAIL
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the plan is to roll MSBuild (engine and some basic tasks)
into the framework distribution (but probably not into the Base
Class Libraries that are defined in the public ECMA spec).
OK, makes sense from a certain perspective,
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When talking about the .net core, we really need context.
I thought so, thanks for the details.
I'm not sure about the details of how and where microsoft is
planning on inserting the build stuff. I suspect it will probably go
into
Thanks again, Alex.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Alex Kipman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The concepts that are undergoing patenting are MSBuild Engine level
concepts that we feel are really innovative (and most of them you
haven't seen yet).
That must be the case (the haven't seen yet part). ;-)
I
On 27 Nov 2003, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just polished up a little sandbox project I've built over in
Ant land, a task library to help a little in a .NET world.
The docs are now online at http://cvs.apache.org/~bodewig/dotnet/
and can be downloaded as http://cvs.apache.org
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003, Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks Stefan - I didn't realize you had a blog. :)
I'm trying to not push it too hard 8-)
Stefan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we decide to add William's task, I think we should :
[...]
- split it up into at least 3 tasks, like Ant has : dirname,
basename, and path-combine (or something, doesn't exist in Ant)
Well, it would probably be called which or
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Path combine just does its best to create a resonable path string
from the inouts you pass it.
Ah, I see.
property name=foo location=bar/
sets foo to ${basedir}/bar in Ant. This would probably be the closest
thing then.
I don't
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is, in fact I spoke to Ian about it last week and he pointed me
at your blog entries on the subject.
Which are certainly not the full story.
Can you recall the justifications made for the element?
The Ant and NAnt communities have
... or whatever anoncvs currently gives (one day delay, more, less?).
Anyway. While building NAnt using mono 0.31 on Linux I get
,
| mono bin/NAnt.exe -buildfile:NAnt.build build
| NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1447.0; net-1.0.win32; nightly; 18.12.03)
| Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Gerry Shaw
|
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004, Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's unfortunately not under a GPL-compatible license (preventing
direct linking), but the command-line interface would work just fine
for most purposes, I believe.
http://weblogs.asp.net/lorenh/archive/2004/04/06/108811.aspx
Hi,
back from vacation so I'm sorry for the delay.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) Run a script to build NAnt (kinda like the bootstrap-ant.sh
script)
2) Use the newly built NAnt to build the rest of Nant-dom (i.e. OSS
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen wrote:
What exactly will Apache be using NAnt for ?
Building open source .NET projects, for example Log4NET on a nightly
basis.
Do you (yourself or Apache) have any issues with our current license
(GPL) ?
Only speaking about the Gump scenario, I don't think
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that you cannot avoid GAC with .NET because of the order in
which the assebmlies are located:
http://www.awprofessional.com/articles/article.asp?p=30601seqNum=6
Thank you for that URL.
In Gump's case we probably can
Hi,
back from vacation so I'm sorry for the delay. I wonder whether my
apache.org address will make it through to the nant list, if not I'll
repost there using the other address I've already use to subscribe
there.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam R. B.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen wrote:
What exactly will Apache be using NAnt for ?
Building open source .NET projects, for example Log4NET on a nightly
basis.
Do you (yourself or Apache) have any issues with our current license
(GPL) ?
Only speaking about the Gump scenario, I don't think
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) A project can have an attribute of language=csharp (and this is
needed to generate lib path).
wouldn't we need a more generic platform or something like this.
Would the lib path treatment of a J# or Nemerle or whatever .NET
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See this article Avoid DevPath for info on why you should avoid
DEVPATH
http://blogs.msdn.com/suzcook/archive/2003/08/15/57238.aspx
Thanks again.
,
| It's not good for the dev. env., either - it makes it unnecessarily
|
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the answer is 'who decides what is the right approach', and
I feel it is the NAnt team.
Yes, I agree. We may need to explain in more detail what we want to
do and why we want to do that with Gump, but we need the expertize
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another interesting feature world be the ability to
specify a XML catalog in the style task in order to
provide a mapping from generic addresses to specific
local directories on a given machine...
This is how Ant solves it. We've
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw2: does anyone had time to try run MSBuild under mono? Maybe it
works? (I fould some Ant/mono/msbuild blogs but dont try myself).
The blog may have been mine, I tried various combinations of NAnt,
MSBuild and Ant on different
Hi,
over in log4net land we are seriously ramping up for a new release (who
would have ever thought that 8-) and need to provide assemblies stripped
down to the client profiles. Has anybody around here got a
configuration that can be used to target the client frameworks?
My first guess, but I
On 2011-10-26, Ryan Boggs wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig
stefan.bode...@freenet.de wrote:
Why do you feel Sourceforge's git offering was insufficient - this is
an honest question as I may be thinking about moving XMLUnit to a
different SCM myself (currently using svn
[cross-posting here as I'm sure I'll reach a few log4net users as well]
The last log4net release already stopped supporting Compact Framework
1.x and the Shared Source CLI as part of the binary distributions - but
versions for them are still buildable from source. In order to figure
out what
40 matches
Mail list logo
