Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-10 Thread Gert Driesen
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Scott Hernandez'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mark Griffiths'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:06 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Next release > This is what I use.

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-10 Thread Cort Schaefer
This is what I use -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Hernandez Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:48 AM To: Mark Griffiths Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Next release Docs, Docs, Docs... Okay, here is what I see

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Ian MacLean
Sansone, Aaron wrote: I'd be willing to take a look at deploying a wiki to my NCode Sourceforge project to see if it works. NCode is a VS.Net IDE Add-In that does code completion from live templates (just like IntelliJ if anyone has used that). ncode.sourceforge.net looks good Aaron. Did

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Dave Sanders
Quoting Tomas Restrepo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That sounds like a great idea. Scott, what do you think? If there's any > problem with getting it on the sourceforge servers, I'd be willing to share > some space on my hosting (provided we find a wiki we can run there). I'm using PureEnergy hosting fo

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Sansone, Aaron
I agree with Dave, documentation needs to be addressed. I really like the Wiki idea. We used a Wiki for documentation on my last project with good success. Our customer resisted it at first our original idea was to get the users to help with the documentation by editing the pages. It was accepte

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Tomas Restrepo
> Two points in particular that I had, or am having a hard time with: Slingshot > and the process flow to use it, and Web projects. We have a fairly complicated > set up here, with a half dozen or so core objects shared by different > applications, and then separate solution files that are kept ou

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Dave Sanders
Quoting Scott Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It would help if you (or really anyone) went through the last build > (http://nant.sf.net/builds) and played the role of a user. What looks out of > date, what looks like it is missing, what need to be done? Considering that I have just found NAnt las

RE: [nant-dev] Next release - and Nunit2

2003-02-05 Thread Arnoldus, Michael
About the next release - I'm all for releasing what we have right now. > Also, consider that last time the topic came up, I said the NUnit2 support > stuff was a showstopper, and I've since fixed it (what could be fixed > without changing NUnit itself). I agree nunit2 is not a showstopper - but a

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Miller, Kevin
-Original Message- From: Scott Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:52 PM To: Miller, Kevin; Griffin Caprio; Mark Griffiths; Jeffrey McManus Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Next release Kevin, you are correct, the only way to get this going is

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Jeffrey McManus
Yep, I did give the Web site a once-over to add some documentation to clear up some conceptual disconnects that I had when I was learning the tool. And I'll be happy to put in more time to deal with any other documentation issues that need to be dealt with for an 0.8 release -- I'd like to hear a c

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Scott Hernandez
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mark Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jeffrey McManus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Next release > >What can we do as a community to ens

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Tomas Restrepo
Scott, > > I'm really leaning towards tossing a build out in the next day or so with > the cvs changelog and not many more docs. > I'm cool with that. Let's get something rolling and, then we can put out a .1 release with better docs, whatever. -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Scott Hernandez
Great. It would help if you (or really anyone) went through the last build (http://nant.sf.net/builds) and played the role of a user. What looks out of date, what looks like it is missing, what need to be done? Maybe the answer is, most of it is okay; and we should roll with a release. I'm feelin

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Tomas Restrepo
<< >What can we do as a community to ensure that this >doesn't happen again? I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the tasks Scott outlined... >> I think part of the problem is that it seems Scott is the only one of the project admins that has been aro

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Miller, Kevin
>What can we do as a community to ensure that this >doesn't happen again? I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the tasks Scott outlined... 1. Looks like Scott volunteered himself. 2. If someone feels excited about this one 3. If I may it would be

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Mark Griffiths
Hi Scott > 2.) ChangeLog (We need to build this by hand from the cvs changes. This is > not a very attractive option, but I don't know of another way). If anyone > knows how to get a list of changes from cvs since the last release (by tag > or date) please let me know. Right now the I can do it, b

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Griffin Caprio
a Zip file. Maybe after we > release NAntContrib we > can do a combined MSI distributions with tools and > all. > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:15 AM >

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Scott Hernandez
ribute as a Zip file. Maybe after we release NAntContrib we can do a combined MSI distributions with tools and all. - Original Message - From: "Mark Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:15 AM Subject: [nant-dev]

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Turpin, Jay
d the solution." - Charles Kettering -Original Message- From: Mark Griffiths [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] Next release Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 rel

[nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Mark Griffiths
Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release is dated 11-jun-2002 - nearly 8 months ago. Is there anything in particular that is holding the release up? Anything that I could lend a hand to? Cheers -MG --- This