Re: [Neo4j] Any plans for an optional schema?

2014-07-17 Thread Axel Morgner
Thanks guys! Hi Jason, if you have questions on Structr, just let me know, we're happy to help! Best Axel Am 16.07.2014 23:31, schrieb Michael Hunger: Right I agree with Tom, currently you get this in structr (even when importing Neo4j databases, e.g. from a GraphGist). It definitely makes

[Neo4j] Any plans for an optional schema?

2014-07-16 Thread Jason Gillman Jr.
I was just wondering if the ability to utilize a schema of sorts was on the road map. When I say schema, I'm thinking more along the lines of relational constraints. Let's use the following simple example. We have the following types of entities represented by node labels (:`Server`)

Re: [Neo4j] Any plans for an optional schema?

2014-07-16 Thread Tom Zeppenfeldt
sounds like structr.org may be something you want to look at .. Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards Ir. T. Zeppenfeldt van der Waalsstraat 30 6706 JR Wageningen The Netherlands Mobile: +31 6 23 28 78 06 Phone: +31 3 17 84 22 17 E-mail: t.zeppenfe...@ophileon.com

Re: [Neo4j] Any plans for an optional schema?

2014-07-16 Thread Michael Hunger
Right I agree with Tom, currently you get this in structr (even when importing Neo4j databases, e.g. from a GraphGist). It definitely makes sense to have a feature like that. For Neo4j this is on the roadmap too, but not in the immediate future, it's more a capacity issue :) Am 16.07.2014 um

Re: [Neo4j] Any plans for an optional schema?

2014-07-16 Thread Alan Robertson
Hi Jason, From your examples, you should look at the Assimilation Project! http://assimilationsystems.com/ http://assimproj.org/ This is exactly the kind of data modeling we're doing - together with automating the collection of the data and keeping it up to date. It's a very