I live less than 15 miles from Wapakoneta Ohio the hometown of Neal Armstrong.
Big celebrations are going on for the 50th anniversary of the APOLLO 11 moon
landing. That got me to thinking about the NASA surplus Nixie Meters I
purchased off EBay some years ago. I posted some pictures on the TCA
Nice set of features. The case looks awfully similar to my square Nixie
watch. I guess that's where the design converges to.
I'm still puzzled why other people need an RTC chip and a fast computer to
make a Nixie watch. I can get excellent results from a PIC running at 32
kHz, keeping time in
I had forgot your design. Excellent project page and thanks for reminding
me of it!
On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 4:23:50 AM UTC-3, Nick wrote:
>
> My MAX1771 design can probably be pushed to that. Yes, C4 & C6 would have
> to be higher voltage and R2 changed - the PRC221 range have a working
Anybody done something similar with B4998 tubes? I know Jeff (RIP) was
working on a wristwatch using them
Nick
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 7:38 AM Paul Andrews wrote:
> Amazing achievement. Having explored low power nixie tube applications
> myself, I can appreciate just how hard it is to do
Amazing achievement. Having explored low power nixie tube applications
myself, I can appreciate just how hard it is to do something with very
constrained requirements like this. I'm curious what processor you used?
On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 9:19:33 AM UTC-4, Remco wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
COOL!!!
But doesn’t get too for your wrist ...??
/Magnus
From: Remco
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 3:19 PM
To: neonixie-l
Subject: [neonixie-l] What do you guys think of my homemade Nixiewatch?
Hi guys,
The last year or so I was doing a hobby project of a nixiewatch. I was
wondering what
Very nice!!! To pull off the electrical design, fab and integrate it into
an aesthetically pleasing watch design is no small feat.
My only criticism of the z5900m is the coarse anode. In my opinion the
previous style tube you used (Burroughs) with the fine mesh anode is much
nicer to look at. But
Thanks Nick, I'll check your design too, but if I am going to make one
it'll have to be through hole, too poor eyesight makes it very hard to
solder SMD for me.
/Martin
On Wednesday, 17 July 2019 09:23:50 UTC+2, Nick wrote:
>
> My MAX1771 design can probably be pushed to that. Yes, C4 & C6
I have to find User manual and read why it displays resistance. It can
measure active resistance of circuit impedance.
So "П" in "П53.20kΩ" means that active resistance on measured circuit is
more than 100k.
Why it shows 53.20kOhm which is within 100k range and "П" I have no
idea...;-(
Thanks!
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 2:50:39 PM UTC+1, martin martin wrote:
>
> Mr Kosbo
> That's a fine site you keep!
>
>
>
> ~
> *mcve...@gmail.com *
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:11 AM kosbo.com >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> It says Вольтметр универсальный, which was simply translated, as
My MAX1771 design can probably be pushed to that. Yes, C4 & C6 would have
to be higher voltage and R2 changed - the PRC221 range have a working
voltage of 200V but are safe to 500V - it would be better to find a 2512
footprint resistor with a 300 or 350 volt working for long term reliability.
Appreciate the offer.
In my book, simple is good and something is way better than nothing.
We have several administrators here and we already shadow the message base
to other locations. There's no reason that we can't do exactly the same for
the library here.
Google drive works well with
12 matches
Mail list logo
