Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Neonixie Spam Messages

2023-04-09 Thread Adrian Godwin
There is a suggestion that google are placing more and more stringent requirements on email senders in order to push users onto a small number of providers such as google themselves and make it more difficult to run your own mailservers. I did see a number of mails from mailing lists in the spam

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Neonixie Spam Messages

2023-04-08 Thread Audrey
For more* On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 2:04 PM Audrey wrote: > Or maybe it's just the recent widespread access to GPT models allowing > forore convincing spam... > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 1:57 PM Robert G. Schaffrath < > robert.schaffr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't think it is just Group but with

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Neonixie Spam Messages

2023-04-08 Thread Audrey
Or maybe it's just the recent widespread access to GPT models allowing forore convincing spam... On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 1:57 PM Robert G. Schaffrath < robert.schaffr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think it is just Group but with Google overall. I use Gmail and I > noticed a large uptick in

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Neonixie Spam Messages

2023-04-08 Thread Robert G. Schaffrath
I don't think it is just Group but with Google overall. I use Gmail and I noticed a large uptick in legitimate messages appearing in the SPAM folder. I used to have to check it once every two days or so but now it is flagging many things I consider innocuous. As some others posts have noted,

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Neonixie Spam Messages

2023-04-07 Thread 'Grahame' via neonixie-l
Hi Just the one pending this morning.. No overly eager moderator - my memory is that we have deleted 4 posts in the last couple of years - two from a Russian tube seller seeking to bypass sanctions and two from someone advertising gold. As Nick said, there doesn't appear to be any moderator