How about a question to the TCA group then ?
john K
Hello John,
oh yes, I am a member there, too, but Mr Barbour is very dominant there
and he insists that NU made Inditrons around 1940. I would love to see a
proof, but until now I did not get any responses.
Jens
--
You received this me
Have you looked at his Yahoo group called electrontubechronicles [ETC ] ?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/electrontubechronicles/
(maybe look at my tiny CV256 in photos "subminiatures" whilst there)
John K
Hello John,
well, I have requested membership at ETC about two years ago, and
rene
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Boos"
> I have been digging through the NEONIXIE-L archive on Yahoo, and found
> this text from Peter J. Stonard,
...clip...
> His website
> (www.stonard.com) is down, too, and archive.org does not have his
> Neonixie-folder archived. (stonard.com/neo
- Original Message -
From: "jb-electronics"
clip...>
> Hmm there have to be some archives dealing with the National Union
> history. (Like the CBI for Burroughs). Anyone have an idea where to
> start looking for National Union information?
>
> Jens
>
How about a question to t
On Nov 9, 9:11 pm, David Forbes wrote:
> Haydu 6700 tube and box photos here:
>
> http://www.nixiebunny.com/haydu6700/index.html
You have a unique variation. I've never seen that sticker before, and
the black domed top cap is not normal for the Haydu version. It
probably dates to right around 195
Haydu 6700 tube and box photos here:
http://www.nixiebunny.com/haydu6700/index.html
Enjoy. Let me know if the description is haywire.
--
David Forbes, Tucson AZ
http://www.cathodecorner.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To po
Hello folks,
I have been digging through the NEONIXIE-L archive on Yahoo, and found
this text from Peter J. Stonard, dated Jan 1, 2004 (message #15482):
__
"Greetings,
I just found a strange tube in my stash. I didn't find out anything
about it since the la
Okay, I suppose I'll give it a shot.
Great news.
Jens: on the subject of Inditrons in the 1940s, that's just wrong. We
were once given bad information as to the Inditron's age, and had a
date estimate of 1940s up on our site for some time. We have since
corrected that information, but it's
On 11/9/2010 1:49 PM, Accutron wrote:
On Nov 9, 2:25 pm, David Forbes wrote:
By the way, I have a Haydu Brothers box with a defective 6700 tube in it. It has
little stickers that say, "A subsidiary of Burroughs Corp." stuck on every side
of the box. Naturally, it was a gift from Tom Jennings.
On Nov 9, 2:25 pm, David Forbes wrote:
> By the way, I have a Haydu Brothers box with a defective 6700 tube in it. It
> has
> little stickers that say, "A subsidiary of Burroughs Corp." stuck on every
> side
> of the box. Naturally, it was a gift from Tom Jennings.
>
> It includes a data sheet.
Hello,
[...] Mr. Ciardiello had [...] had regurgitated the same incorrect Haydu origin
mantra. He subsequently
edited the content of this article enough that it is vaguely-not-
incorrect, but he doesn't actually admit that I was right all along.
The Haydu Vs. Burroughs article is basically usel
On Nov 9, 2:44 pm, Accutron wrote:
...
> The Wikipedia Nixie tube page is horrible and wrong on many issues,
> and should be ignored by all thinking individuals.
...
Please - do us all a favour and update it. Some of us have had a go at
bits (I did the citations and some other parts about lifespa
On Nov 9, 2:25 pm, David Forbes wrote:
> Thanks for the ad scans. They are historically interesting. Have you ever
> seen a
> real Vari-Count module?
I've never seen anything made by Haydu in person, other than the
orange-label 6700. I've never even seen a photo of a Vari-Count
module. They migh
Hello again,
Here are the three early advertisements I know about. They were
published in Electronics magazine between May and December 1955...
[...]
Oh yes, the article from Mr Ciardiello, see it here:
http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/nixie_and_trochotron_haydu_vs_burroughs.html
How do you
On 11/9/2010 12:09 PM, Accutron wrote:
Here are the three early advertisements I know about. They were
published in Electronics magazine between May and December 1955...
http://www.radiomuseum.org/forumdata/users/6435/vm_tubes/magnetron/Haydu1.jpg
http://www.radiomuseum.org/forumdata/users/6435
On Nov 9, 1:48 pm, jb-electronics wrote:
> Hello Micah,
(snipped)
Here are the three early advertisements I know about. They were
published in Electronics magazine between May and December 1955...
http://www.radiomuseum.org/forumdata/users/6435/vm_tubes/magnetron/Haydu1.jpg
http://www.radiomuse
Hello Micah,
The patent, official datasheet and press release for the GI-10
Inditron are all dated 1954. Here's the original datasheet, dated May
1954...
How embarassing - I never noticed the small "issued May 1954", even
though I have had this datasheet a long time. Good that this is a
keyb
On Nov 9, 11:21 am, jb-electronics
wrote:
> Hello Micah,
(snipped)
The patent, official datasheet and press release for the GI-10
Inditron are all dated 1954. Here's the original datasheet, dated May
1954...
http://www.decadecounter.com/vta/pict5/inditrongi10.jpg
The GI-10 patent (US2756366) w
Hello Micah,
National Union released the Inditron in 1954.
Do you have an add or a press release for that? That would be amazing. I
only have the snippet from "Popular Science", 1954, that you also have
on your VTA website.
Haydu was bought by Burroughs in 1954.
OK, that is also what
On Nov 9, 10:02 am, Unmitigated Fool
wrote:
> Micah, You should edit the article so it's accurate. That's how a Wiki
> should work.
That may be how they *should* work, but what actually happens is that
a small group of despots take over the page, and any unsanctioned
changes are reverted. I use
On Nov 8, 12:12 pm, jb-electronics
wrote:
> Hmm I have historical proof that Haydu Bros already were a Burroughs
> subsidiary when they advertised the Nixie tube, see
> here:http://www.jb-electronics.de/html/elektronik/nixies/n_hb106.htmNow that
> was 1955, so quite early.
>
> But sadly, I do not
It actually makes a lot of sense. Like the IN-13s and IN-9s, as the
current gets higher (more voltage applied to the ballast series
resistor), more surface is involved in the ionization. The intuitive
limit to the regulation portion of the characteristics would be when
the ionization covers the who
I ran the least poisoned tube for 8 hours at 30 mA. This morning all
but a small dot of poisoning has gone away. Both surfaces glow over
their whole area. The voltage across the tube dropped to 68.5 VAC.
Now on to the second tube with hopes for similar results.
> > But those usually have more c
Micah, You should edit the article so it's accurate. That's how a Wiki
should work.
Accutron wrote:
The Wikipedia Nixie tube page is horrible and wrong on many issues,
and should be ignored by all thinking individuals.
Micah Mabelitini
http://www.decadecounter.com/
--
You received
24 matches
Mail list logo
