On Jan 8, 5:46 pm, micha...@aol.com wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Very long response. I read it.
>
> Amazingly, you made a response that didn't argue why everyone should do it
> along with all the money they would save (like a typical salesman would
> do).
I'm an engineer, not a random tree-hugger...
On 11-01-09 12:04 PM, Blitzen wrote:
On 8 Jan, 11:46, micha...@aol.com wrote:
Nick,
I am against the idea of solar and other power conserving ideas.
Michail,
Your way of thinking and talking about this is counterproductive,
Alternative power is very interesting technology, but every ca
On 8 Jan, 11:46, micha...@aol.com wrote:
> Nick,
> I am against the idea of solar and other power conserving ideas. Quite
> simply, the costs
Michail,
Your way of thinking and talking about this is counterproductive, as
you admit yourself.
Nick, you are to be commended for doing this. It's q
Nick,
Very long response. I read it.
Amazingly, you made a response that didn't argue why everyone should do it
along with all the money they would save (like a typical salesman would
do).
I am against the idea of solar and other power conserving ideas. Quite
simply, the costs to cons
We rebuilt out house as "carbon neutral" as we could in 2005 - the
work took most of a year - it was essentially a managed "self-build".
We are on decent hill in the South of England, exposed to the
prevailing winds and with a large area of South-facing roof & land. I
am especially interested in th
