Dave Shield wrote:
>>I have a piece of what I think is portable C that searches through all
>>the CVS/Entries to find the file with the newest timestamp.
>
>
> Thanks for the offer - and if we do go down this road, that might well
> be worth looking at. But I remain unconvinced that it's necessar
Gisle Vanem wrote:
"Alex Burger" wrote:
Which version are you trying to compile? It should be 5.1.1 or higher.
5.1.1 and 5.1.2pre2 compile fine with MinGW. Are you trying to build
from MAIN in CVS? I haven't tried it lately. Did you read the MinGW
section in README.WIN32?
Yes. I'm buildin
Gisle Vanem wrote:
"Andy Smith" wrote:
Other than that it is a typical ./configure ; make ; make install. Are you
using MSyS or some compatible shell?
No, why? A package that supposedly is for Window too, should IMHO be
able to configure and build using the default shell (cmd or 4NT etc.).
E.g. b
A script for obtaining the 5.1 patches line
#-- cut here --
#! /bin/sh
CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/net-snmp
export CVSROOT
cvs login
cvs -z3 co -P -r V5-1-patches net-snmp
#-- cut here --
Once you know which version you want to extract,
substitute its name for "V5-1-patches" above
Gisle Vanem wrote:
"Andy Smith" wrote:
Actually I have been building fine from CVS using MinGW for a while now.
Nothing special aside from configuring with a --prefix without spaces needs
to be done. I might suggest downloading my regex package for MinGW if you
haven't already. the URL is in the R
"Alex Burger" wrote:
> Which version are you trying to compile? It should be 5.1.1 or higher.
> 5.1.1 and 5.1.2pre2 compile fine with MinGW. Are you trying to build
> from MAIN in CVS? I haven't tried it lately. Did you read the MinGW
> section in README.WIN32?
Yes. I'm building the CVS
"Andy Smith" wrote:
> Actually I have been building fine from CVS using MinGW for a while now.
> Nothing special aside from configuring with a --prefix without spaces needs
> to be done. I might suggest downloading my regex package for MinGW if you
> haven't already. the URL is in the README.win32
Robert Story (Coders) wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:48:25 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> RS> Actually, for branches, I agree that (a) is reasonable.
However, for
> DS> RS> main, I like (b) better. eg, right now I see main as "what
will be
> DS> RS> 5.2",
> DS> RS> not "what was 5.1 + changes" (that w
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:15:32 +0200 Gisle wrote:
GV> I just discovered the CVS at sourceforge is out-of-date compared
GV> to the time-stamps in .tar.ball 5.1.2.pre2. I used these commands:
GV>
GV> cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/net-snmp login
GV> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs
