Thomas Anders wrote:
Dave Shield wrote:
Is "5.3.development" OK, or are there any better suggestions?
Good things come to those who wait. :)
This makes sense, finally, although it could be shortened to
"5.3.dev" while still being clear, IMHO.
+Thomas
I would have to agree with shortening it to dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bastian Angerstein wrote:
I have problems with nearly every 5.x Version,
especially the perl stuff, on AIX 4.3.3 using gcc
is anything done to improve compatibility?
Feel free to ask me for testing code on AIX4.3.3 Powerpcs.
But I have to say I am not a natural c coder and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 1:35:19 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael J. Slifcak) said:
Michael> Is there _significant_ downside to incorporating this patch
Michael> before the 5.1.2 release ?
should be ok if it helps things.
Actually, I've got a different pat
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:17:14 -0400, Ray Galante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Ray> I came across your e-mail in a text document
Ray> (UCD-DEMO-MIB.text). I do not understand the purpose of this on
Ray> my computer? Could you please enlighten me.
You might start on our web page and go from there
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:16:57 -0400, "Collins, Laurence F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Laurence> I have a small perl script that I run as a cron job. I get
Laurence> "error in packet Reason: (genError) A general failure
Laurence> occurred Failedobject: TCP-MIB::tcpconnstate in the root
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:32:32 -0700, "Sam Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Sam> NOTIFICATION-TEST-MIB: Module not found
Sam> NET-SNMP-TUTORIAL-MIB: Module not found
Those come from your mib settings trying to find them. You can either
install them, or remove them from the required list of MI
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:21:39 +0200, Xavier Delannoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Xavier> When net-snmp send a coldstart trap, it seems to send the trap
Xavier> with an incorrect IP source address. Is this a know bug ?
Yes, its a known bug. We don't force the source address, so it quite
likely
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:49:46 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> RS> What you've proposed is pretty much the way it works now, except
DS> RS> the default for the flag is no auto next.
DS>
DS> Except that I'm suggesting that we have a quick push to convert
DS> *all* the (internal) helpers as far as possible (and
I vote pre3
-Original Message-
From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 4:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 5.1.2.??? status
Ok, it happened again. I hit a deadline, had to travel for a week (to
the deadline) and got lost in a quagmire of mail that
Bastian Angerstein wrote:
>I have problems with nearly every 5.x Version,
>especially the perl stuff, on AIX 4.3.3 using gcc
>is anything done to improve compatibility?
>
>Feel free to ask me for testing code on AIX4.3.3 Powerpcs.
>But I have to say I am not a natural c coder and only have little
hi
I have an interface with 2 IP : IP1 and IP2
I have configured net-snmp with the agentaddress token, in order to liste on the IP2.
When net-snmp send a coldstart trap, it seems to send the trap with an incorrect IP
source address. Is this a know bug ?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wes Hardaker wrote:
|>On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:02:28 +0100, Dave Shield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
|
|
| Dave> R 5.1.1
| Dave> C 5.1.1+cvs 2004/06/01
| Dave> R 5.1.2.pre1
| Dave> C 5.1.2.pre1 2004/07/01
|
| I don't think the reported version number as
I have problems with nearly every 5.x Version,
especially the perl stuff, on AIX 4.3.3 using gcc
is anything done to improve compatibility?
Feel free to ask me for testing code on AIX4.3.3 Powerpcs.
But I have to say I am not a natural c coder and only have little
knowledge of compiling stuff.
Hi,
I have a small perl script that I run as a cron job. I get "error in packet
Reason: (genError) A general failure occurred Failedobject:
TCP-MIB::tcpconnstate in the root mail. Any ideas? Is there a place to
look up errors off the website?
Thanks much,
Laurence F. Collins
Siemens @ Saint
> Where are we with respect to the patches being worked on for 5.1.2?
> Can I release a .pre3 or are we at .rc1 stage now?
Mike's probably been the most active recently.
Robert seems to be concentrating on the more interesting stuff
involved with 5.2, and I've been busy arguing with Robert :-)
Dear Sir,
When I run my application program, which sends out traps, the
application
program prints out the following messages on the console:
==
NOTIFICATION-TEST-MIB: Module not found
NET-SNMP-TUTORIAL-MIB: Module not found
Dave Shield wrote:
Is "5.3.development" OK, or are there any better suggestions?
Good things come to those who wait. :)
This makes sense, finally, although it could be shortened to
"5.3.dev" while still being clear, IMHO.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
---
I came across your e-mail in a text document (UCD-DEMO-MIB.text). I do
not understand the purpose of this on my computer? Could you please
enlighten me.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Brief
Dave> R 5.1.1
Dave> C 5.1.1+cvs 2004/06/01
Dave> R 5.1.2.pre1
Dave> C 5.1.2.pre1 2004/07/01
Wes> I don't think the reported version number as released by the tools
Wes> should have anything other than things parsable by .s. IE, 5.1.1.cvs
Wes> and 5.1.2.pre1.cvs should be the only style things w
DS> - By default, handlers return success/failure, but don't explicitly
DS> call the next handler in the chain. This is (normally)
DS> done by the main netsnmp_call_next_handler routine.
DS> (i.e. AUTO_NEXT becomes the default)
RS> Well, the problem ther
> Is there any way to make the following line use wildcards
> for the IP address (mynetwork)?
> com2sec mynetwork 192.168.0.0/24 private
Yes - that should work.
> Or better yet, can I set the agent up such that it ignores the
> IP address all together and just uses the community string?
21 matches
Mail list logo
