RE: Adding interfaces to the IFMIB via AgentX

2004-12-16 Thread Gillis, Philip W (Philip)
Dear Igor (or anyone else interested in this problem), I am trying to have one master agent, and multiple AgentX subagents, each implementing a row of the same table. It sounds like you have done this, but I have not been able to. From what I understand you to say, you call netsnmp_create_ha

Re: memory leak fixed

2004-12-16 Thread Coders
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:28:34 +0300 (MSK) hippoage wrote: H> Attached patch fixes memory leak that described in #1062954 and #1034008 The patch that went into CVS can be found attached to this bug report: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1034008&group_id=12694&atid=112694

Re: Supported Net-SNMP MIBs

2004-12-16 Thread David T. Perkins
HI Robert, Nice summary document at http://www.net-snmp.org/README.agent-mibs. Here are a few suggestions: 1) Add a title like, "NET SNMP: Support status of Managed Objects and Notifications" 2) Replace the beginning of the document with the following: This document lists the support statu

Re: Linux Build Failing

2004-12-16 Thread Coders
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:18:10 -0500 Andy wrote: AS> It looks like it is failing in the link stage. The best I can deduce AS> from the output is that util_funcs.c is not being built or that the AS> library that it is linked into is not being linked properly to the AS> agent. I have included my bui

Re: Net-snmp-coders digest, Vol 1 #2370 - 3 msgs

2004-12-16 Thread Gary Price \(ICT\)
I run MSVC 6 only under duress. Its STL implementation is well known to have serious problems for multithreaded applications (See Meyers book on STL). MSVC7 is far superior and a pleasure to use. Catering to MSVC 6 is not only not worth the bother, it couold be considered a bad idea. Gary Price

Re: Net-snmp-coders digest, Vol 1 #2370 - 3 msgs

2004-12-16 Thread Andrew Hood
Gary Price (ICT) wrote: I run MSVC 6 only under duress. Its STL implementation is well known to have serious problems for multithreaded applications (See Meyers book on STL). MSVC7 is far superior and a pleasure to use. Catering to MSVC 6 is not only not worth the bother, it couold be considered

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-16 Thread Andy Smith
Alex Burger wrote: Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:49:41 -0500 Alex wrote: AB> I still think it's unreasonable to have to tailor to users of old AB> compilers when the fix is for the user is to download a *FREE* SDK from AB> Microsoft. That is an extra library to be linked in

Re: Memory consumption with registering instances

2004-12-16 Thread Coders
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:48:28 +0100 Grasic wrote: GI> For the same table now I'm using netsnmp_register_handler(), each for one GI> column and interface (because range_subid nad range_ubound doesn't work in GI> version 5.1.1) Did you try 5.1.2 or the new 5.2? I know I've seen a patch for range reg

Supported Net-SNMP MIBs

2004-12-16 Thread Mark Buehler
Hello,   I see from the Net-SNMP FAQ that only a few MIBs are officially supported:   MIB-2 UCD extensions Host Resources SNMPv3    To your knowledge are there Net-SNMP implementations otherwise available by some means for other standard MIBs? I'm particularly interested in the following

Re: Supported Net-SNMP MIBs

2004-12-16 Thread Coders
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:11:15 -0600 Mark wrote: MB> I see from the Net-SNMP FAQ that only a few MIBs are officially supported: MB> MB> MIB-2 MB> UCD extensions MB> Host Resources MB> SNMPv3 MB> MB> To your knowledge are there Net-SNMP implementations otherwise available by MB> some means for ot

RE: Adding interfaces to the IFMIB via AgentX

2004-12-16 Thread Grasic Igor
Hello Phillip, Picture worth more than thousand of words, so I will direct you to one of my posts: 'Problems with registering handlers with extended range (range_subid, range_ubound)' posted on 2004-12-09 07:00. There is example code, which registers *one handler* for *one column* for indexes

RE: Memory consumption with registering instances

2004-12-16 Thread Grasic Igor
Hello, Thanks Wes! Registering instances for the part of the table was *so big* because I did register: 8x13x8x96 = 79872 instances (!). This was needed for the dsx1IntervalTable for eight line indexes and memory consumption increase from about 2.5MB to 11MB of running memmory. Nightmare. F

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-16 Thread Coders
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:49:41 -0500 Alex wrote: AB> I still think it's unreasonable to have to tailor to users of old AB> compilers when the fix is for the user is to download a *FREE* SDK from AB> Microsoft. That is an extra library to be linked in, increasing agent size for someone who may be t

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-16 Thread Alex Burger
Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:49:41 -0500 Alex wrote: AB> I still think it's unreasonable to have to tailor to users of old AB> compilers when the fix is for the user is to download a *FREE* SDK from AB> Microsoft. That is an extra library to be linked in, increasing agent