Re: 5.1.4.rc1 available for testing.

2006-03-10 Thread Dave Shield
Quoting Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I thought we actually had agreed ... that 5.1.4 would be the last... If I'm wrong ... and people think it's the wrong choice, then lets decide that *before* I say that in the formal announcement. No - I think it's the right time to close down 5.1.x.

Re: 5.[234] CVS broken (coverity fixes?)

2006-03-10 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:35:38 -0800, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Thomas> Anyone else seeing this? Ideas? (I haven't had the chance yet Thomas> to look into the details.) Wes> Yeah, I saw it very late last night. Then when "zzz" Fixed... Summary: 59 / 59 succeeded. -- Wes

verify connection to master agent

2006-03-10 Thread brisse
I would like a mechanism to check the connection to the master agent. For example the master crashes and then up again. How can I make sure that my subagent reconnect properly to the master??? Do I have to do these steps again: netsnmp_ds_set_boolean(NETSNMP_DS_APPLICATION_ID,NETSNMP_DS_A

Re: 5.1.4.rc1 available for testing.

2006-03-10 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:40:15 +, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> While we are at discussing 5.1.x, how are we going to deal with >> the "Coverity bugs" and 5.1.x (and 5.0.x)? Dave> My gut reaction is to say that the Coverity bugs should be Dave> considered w.r.t 5.2.x and above.

Re: 5.1.4.rc1 available for testing.

2006-03-10 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:13:12 +, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Really? When did that get decided? Dave> Well, Wes' original announcement said: Dave> this will likely be the last release in the Dave> 5.1.X series. Dave> which certainly matches the general impression I'd got.

Re: FW: Implementation of a mib array in a agent.

2006-03-10 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 13:45:19 +0100, "Le Gall Jean-Patrick (Skysoft ATM)" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Le> I've try to use mib2c.scalar.conf, but it don't seems to work. That's not for tables (arrays). That won't work Le> I've try to look for a netSnmpArray management, but it seems

Re: 5.[234] CVS broken (coverity fixes?)

2006-03-10 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:29:24 +0100, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Thomas> one of the CVS commits (mostly Coverity fixes) within the last Thomas> two days managed to break all three Thomas> MAIN/V5-3-patches/V5-2-patches major CVS lines. It still Thomas> builds for me on Linu

5.[234] CVS broken (coverity fixes?)

2006-03-10 Thread Thomas Anders
-Coders, one of the CVS commits (mostly Coverity fixes) within the last two days managed to break all three MAIN/V5-3-patches/V5-2-patches major CVS lines. It still builds for me on Linux/x86, but "make test" only has 39/58 (MAIN), 37/58 (5.3.1.dev) and 33/46 (5.2.2.dev) success scores. Anyo