Re: [PATCH] RFC: Recalculate storage units for big disks

2011-02-07 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:52:52 +0100, Jan Safranek > said: JS> I can easily add new config token 'recalculateStorageUnits yes/no', JS> probably off by default (=same behaviour as it is now), and let admin JS> choose what he wants. Does it look better to you? Yep! I'd even default to on

Re: Custom-Made Trap Using Solaris 10 (NET-SNMP)

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
On 7 February 2011 15:29, Autry, Steven R (Steve) wrote: > I think we do have Disman support.  I believe we are running Net-SNMP SDK > v5.4.2.1. OK - that sounds more promising. > Below is a list of the MIBs that are initialized on our server after starting > the > System Management Agent, as

RE: Custom-Made Trap Using Solaris 10 (NET-SNMP)

2011-02-07 Thread Autry, Steven R (Steve)
Dave, I think we do have Disman support. I believe we are running Net-SNMP SDK v5.4.2.1. Below is a list of the MIBs that are initialized on our server after starting the System Management Agent, as shown below: # /usr/sfw/bin/net-snmp-config --snmpd-module-list ucd-snmp/diskio mibII/system_

RE: Custom-Made Trap Using Solaris 10 (NET-SNMP)

2011-02-07 Thread Autry, Steven R (Steve)
Thank you for your advice. We are using version 5.0.9 of the Net-SNMP agent. bash-3.00# snmpwalk -V NET-SNMP version: 5.0.9 bash-3.00# Steve Autry IMS Solutions Engineering Alcatel-Lucent 3400 West Plano Parkway Plano, TX 75075 Office: (972) 886-5923 -Original Message- From: dave.sh

Re: Custom-Made Trap Using Solaris 10 (NET-SNMP)

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
On 7 February 2011 14:21, Autry, Steven R (Steve) wrote: > We are using version 5.0.9 of the Net-SNMP agent. Ah! That's not good news. Version 5.0.9 is over seven years old now A lot of the useful features (including the DisMan Event Monitor support) have only been added since that release The

snmpgetnext bug on "no instance" object - SNMP

2011-02-07 Thread Krishna Bandi
Hello All, I am having trouble with snmpgetnext and snmpwalk and was browsing the net-snmp forums and found that there is a bug already raised for this in 2007 and there does not seem to be a fix for this unless I am wrong. Here are the details of the bug raised http://sourceforge.net/tr

Re: Custom-Made Trap Using Solaris 10 (NET-SNMP)

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
On 31 January 2011 23:10, Autry, Steven R (Steve) wrote: > Could you please let me know if you can email me sample code for creating a > custom-made trap using the Net-SNMP that gets installed with Solaris 10 by > default. Which version of the agent will you be using? (I don't have easy access to

Re: create new raw in table

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
On 2 February 2011 15:52, Egor wrote: > Is there way to create new raw in some table by snmp request? > So, if yes, how it can be realized by mib2c module and mfd? I presume you are asking about creating a new row in the table? The standard MIB mechanism for this is to have a column of type 'Row

Re: clarification in net snmp

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy. Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn and offer advice. Thanks. ] On 7 Feb

Need some papers on snmpwalk tool and MIB counters.

2011-02-07 Thread Prakash KL
Hi, Im looking for some papers on snmpwalk tool, and also as to how to understand the OIDs in the counter based snmpwalks. Some papers should help me. regards, prakash -- The modern datacenter depends on network con

Re: SET Request: row creation can't find functions

2011-02-07 Thread Egor
> > > but I can't find function check_index in xxx_data_set.c > > I presume you mean the function 'yyy_check_index' ? > > I'm no expert on the MfD framework, but it looks as if this > should be generated as part of xxx_data_access.c, > rather than xxx_data_set.c > > Yes, you are right, it's some mi