Re: Problem using IP_RECVDSTADDR on HPUX.

2013-11-13 Thread Jean-Paul VILLETTE
Hello, Thanks for your mail. I don't understand what your point is exactly. What's your idea ? Do you mean the configure has been changed (or patched) to better handle this option ? Regards, Jean-Paul VILLETTE HP Den 07-11-2013 12:54, Jean-Paul VILLETTE skrev: Due to the many uses of this

Re: Problem using IP_RECVDSTADDR on HPUX.

2013-11-13 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Jean-Paul VILLETTE wrote: Thanks for your mail. I don't understand what your point is exactly. What's your idea ? Do you mean the configure has been changed (or patched) to better handle this option ? Configure tries to determine whether the option

Re: Problem using IP_RECVDSTADDR on HPUX.

2013-11-13 Thread Jean-Paul VILLETTE
Hello Niels, OK. Understood. I think the configure does not test if IP_RECVDSTADDR is present and usable. This means for hpux, the IP_RECVDSTADDR is enabled due to its definition in /usr/include/sys/socket.h but nothing enables the rest of the code to use this particular format. As i said

Re: Problem using IP_RECVDSTADDR on HPUX.

2013-11-13 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:19:30PM +0100, Jean-Paul VILLETTE wrote: I think the configure does not test if IP_RECVDSTADDR is present and usable. This means for hpux, the IP_RECVDSTADDR is enabled due to its definition in /usr/include/sys/socket.h but nothing enables the rest of the code to

Re: Hardcoded network Interfaces limit on Solaris

2013-11-13 Thread lijo x.george
Thanks for the link to the patch. I'll try that out and see. I'm presently on a older version (5.4.1). Could you please let me know from which version the caching mechanism has been changed. ( A bug number would be fine, i'll search for the changes.) Thanks, Lijo On 11/8/2013 1:08 PM, Niels

Re: Hardcoded network Interfaces limit on Solaris

2013-11-13 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:05:07AM +0530, lijo x.george wrote: Thanks for the link to the patch. I'll try that out and see. I'm presently on a older version (5.4.1). Any reason not to upgrade? Could you please let me know from which version the caching mechanism has been changed. It will