ia:
init_master_agent()
netsnmp_transport_open_server()
netsnmp_tdomain_transport_full()
netsnmp_udp6_create_tstring()
scope_id is set. Is this deliberate? Does it fall under transportDomainUdpIpv6z
transport type?
Regards,
Adam.
or add a new attribute and continue to support old
attribute if address is IPv4?
Any suggestions appreciated.
Regards,
Adam.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today&#
ress is IPv4?
Any suggestions appreciated.
Regards,
Adam.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can
Okay, thanks Dave. I didn't look at the Git repository.
Dissecting the ChangeLog, a typical couple of entries might be:
2011-09-22 Dave Shield
* : commit c55f608f16f160f5e79dc057f8878def462973e1 Author: Dave
Shield Date: Thu Sep 22 10:35:24 2011
+0100
2011-09-22 Steve Friedl
*
t the ChangeLog and CHANGES files as well as the tracker for
bugs and patches but I can't find an obvious way of getting a definitive
summary which references all the changes that have occurred. Is this
possible?
Reg
_ret.
I guess I am just wondering if there is a reason for these differences
or should it all be made consistent?
Regards,
Adam.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's
leaks. I am aware of
snmp-fuzzer :
http://www.vulnerabilityassessment.co.uk/snmpfuzzer.htm
but I believe this does not exercise SNMPv3.
Regards,
Adam.
--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it
I just did a grep through the net-snmp code [5.7 as well] and I can't
see anywhere where the snmpSilentDrops stat gets updated. Am I missing
something?
Adam
> -Original Message-
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On
> Behalf Of Dave
request rather than attempt to send a too big (or any
other) error response. Is this the correct behavior?
Adam.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 4:51 PM
> To: Lewis Adam-VNQM87
> Cc:
mited
resources and it would be interesting to know how unix-style agents cope
with the same sort of test.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Story [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 2:50 PM
> To: Lewis Adam-VNQM87
> Cc: [email protected]
#x27;s the best place to implement it? I'm guessing we could modify
snmp_pdu_parse() to check the count as it runs through the varbind list.
Any thoughts would be welcome.
Regards,
Adam.
--
BlackBerry® DevCon Ameri
ntries()
vacm_destroyAllViewEntries()
vacm_destroyAllGroupEntries()
usm_add_user()
vacm_createGroupEntry()
vacm_createAccessEntry()
vacm_createViewEntry()
> -Original Message-
> From: Lewis Adam-VNQM87
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 7:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
troyAllAccessEntries()
vacm_destroyAllViewEntries()
vacm_destroyAllGroupEntries()
usm_add_user()
vacm_createGroupEntry()
vacm_createAccessEntry()
vacm_createViewEntry()
is there anything else I need to consider? Sessions? Other engine ID
dependant structures that need to be destroyed
on a regular basis.
Regards,
Adam
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and
that snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime get used in timeliness
calculations and I was concerned we might break this mechanism if we
don't force a reboot.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Adam.
--
Simplify data backup and recover
> -Original Message-
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:30 PM
> To: Lewis Adam-VNQM87
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Trap retries
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 1:44 PM
> To: Lewis Adam-VNQM87
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Trap retries
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 12:56 PM
> To: Lewis Adam-VNQM87
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Trap retries
>
ds later.
Any clarification would be appreciated,
Adam.
--
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advan
Here is a simple demo I put together that exemplifies the problem I'm
seeing. If you run this code as-is, memory use will increase indefinately.
However, if you take out the snmp_send() call and just call snmp_free_pdu(),
memory use will remain perfectly flat. I should also mention that my
netsnmp.
I'm using 5.5.1.pre2.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Adam Mendlik wrote:
>
>> I've written a Windows service which consumes an inbound data stream and
>> sends out SNMP traps using netsnmp.lib.
>>
snmp_send() is leaking memory, how do
I fix it, or should I be using a different function in this scenario?
Thanks in advance,
Adam
--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
Real-Tim
Robert Story wrote:
> It is a bug, and I saw that Wes just got through checking in a fix.
Thanks for
> prodding us. :-)
Okay. Had a quick look at the patches and couldn't see anything. What's
the best way of picking up the off
or just a bug? It certainly seems wrong to
allow a de-activated user to successfully issue commands.
Regards,
Adam.
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit
OK - sounds good.
So if vacm is enabled - it should reject unauthenticated read and writes?
That's sounds reasonable
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:01 AM
To:
does not solve this either because anyone could spoof the user name in the
un-authenticated packet.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:13 AM
To: Szudy Brett-CBS035
Cc: [email protected]
Hi all,
I am trying to get mib2c to work properly.. net-snmp version 5.2.4
I have built and installed the net-snmp code with
--with-perl-modules enabled.
I then cd'd into perl
perl Makefile.PL [-NET-SNMP-CONFIG="sh ../../net-snmp-config"]
[-NET-SNMP-SOURCE=true]
make
make test
make install
Th
I actually submitted code for multi-varbind processing using the table iterator
approach last year too.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Fri 3/20/2009 6:44 AM
To: EYRE Bernadette
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re
,
ASN_UNSIGNED,
0);
but have not looked deeper into this solution
Thanks for the help,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [email protected] on behalf of Dave Shield
Sent: Tue 3/3/2009 9:32 AM
To: Bell, Adam
Cc
OK
I try a few things and submit my solution when I have it working.
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [email protected] on behalf of Dave Shield
Sent: Mon 3/2/2009 3:48 AM
To: Bell, Adam
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ASN_PRIV_IMPLIED_OCTET_STR
info about the individual
index lengths, the table_info->number_indexes == 3 (that is correct)
The question is - how to split the index apart properly and get this to work?
Is this something that has been fixed in later versions?
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Bell, A
the oid handler/recognition against
registered OIDs but could you point at where to start looking. Is there some
code to be added for this new type that would parse the OID without the length
bytes in the encoding?
Attached is some code for the current condition.
Thanks so much,
Thanks for the pointer,
will try it.
-Original Message-
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:56 AM
To: Bell, Adam
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question on SNMP version
Network Associates
Copyright Cisco
Copyright Free Software Foundation
and on and on.
How does this impact the GPL license and or usage/distribution of
net-snmp code?
Thanks you in advance for your response.
Adam
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged
the second encoding.
Is there standard way to encode fixed length OCTECT Strings?
Thanks,
Adam
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please
OK
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:38 AM
To: Bell, Adam
Cc: Wes Hardaker; [email protected]
Subject: Re: processing multiple varbinds as a blob
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:56:
echecking, and free it when the check routines are
complete.
My question is. Is there a better way to do this that fits in with the
architecture? Is there a way to set a vb as checked that is built in?
Thanks in advance,
Adam
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
TruthValue already has a meaning, and redefining it is not a good idea. Why
don't you just define an INTEGER with a single enumerated value of 1 for the
specific MIB in question.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jayapra
external library to the .so files?
Is it required to link against the .so before the link for snmpd.(seems
logical)
Tha
I find the simplest way is to
1. Write the notification MIB with the varbinds defined
2. run mib2c with mib2c.notify.conf, this builds the varbind list
automatically
3. link the code generated into the snmpd application
4. send the trap from snmpd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
appreciated,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Bell
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Writing/building my trap send code
All,
I have read through the trap send related FAQs but I
My bad, I missed a '(' in the param list. There is a function call in the
parameter list
Prototypes match fine.
Sorry all
Adam
-Original Message-----
From: Adam Bell
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 12:49 PM
To: Adam Bell; Dave Shield
Cc: [email protected]
S
and found nothing like the second
prototype.
I am running v5.2.3 net-snmp.
Any ideas?
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Bell
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:06 AM
To: Dave Shield
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE
going to be sent?
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 5:51 AM
To: Adam Bell
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Decrease execute times of get_first_data_point() when getBulk
On
lower level
Is there a way to turn on the caching with mib2c.iterate_access.conf?
Any advise is appreciated.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Shield
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:07 AM
To: Zhang Chuan
Cc: net-snmp-coders
do post
set IO processing.
Thanks in advance,
Adam
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be
privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to this
Have you tried putting a timer on the data load so that when init runs, the
table is not fetched again? This is my plan for the tables I must read.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zhang
Chuan
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:26 PM
To: net-snmp-coders@list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:25 PM
To: Adam Bell
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: mib2c generated code and GET_NEXT
On 01/03/07, Adam Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
The MODE_GET_NEXT and MODE_GET_BULK are not handled, maybe
that is why the get_first and get_next handlers for the row search are
missing too?
What to do here?
Thanks,
Adam J. Bell
The information contained in this
there a limit to the number
of options supplied to configure?
In this configure scripts the enable-mini-agent and disable-debugging are
not in the configure options because they are not working.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Fromreide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday
I am trying to integrate net-snmp v 5.4 into a small footprint device under
Linux and am having a couple problems.
1. The configure option --enable-mini-agent causes ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.so:
undefined reference to `initialize_table_ifXTable during make
I am trying top make this as small as pos
somewhere (hopefully, in *one* place in
the library) there needs to be a swap from network order off the wire into
host order bound for memory.
does anyone know if this is sufficient, or is it a bad idea?
thanks in advance,
adam
---
SF email is
52 matches
Mail list logo
