Currently my implementation is assuming B==R.
any other case generates error in use.
On 2/5/07, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:34:45AM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>
> > If, using the definitions of N, B and R from the ID, B != R, then what
> > sh
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:34:45AM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> If, using the definitions of N, B and R from the ID, B != R, then what should
> happen? If B < R I suppose the extra B's should be ignored but if R > B the
> most reasonable interpretation of the additional parameters seems to be
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:34:45AM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:36:44AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snm
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:36:44AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> > client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> > Get Range was defi
Dave,
I'm going to start reviewing the code this weekend. I'm unfamiliar
with the code so it will take me a while as well before I could bring
up design ideas.
As I said this is a tool for an academic project so I'll be on it anyhow.
I would be glad to have someone to share with ideas on implement
Dave Shield wrote:
>Wes, Robert, Thomas et al - what would your feelings be about
> including this sort of extension into the main Net-SNMP distribution?
> (via an explicit option to 'configure', of course).
No objections from my side.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.
On 25/01/07, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> > I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> > client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> > Get Range was defined in Internet Draft but was
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> Get Range was defined in Internet Draft but wasn't approved as RFC.
I personally would very much app
On 24/01/07, Yaniv S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> Get Range was defined in Internet Draft but wasn't approved as RFC.
> My question is whether I'm able to implement it as a dif
Hello all,
I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
Get Range was defined in Internet Draft but wasn't approved as RFC.
My question is whether I'm able to implement it as a different module
on your code?
I need to retriev
10 matches
Mail list logo
