Currently my implementation is assuming B==R.
any other case generates error in use.
On 2/5/07, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:34:45AM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>
> > If, using the definitions of N, B and R from the ID, B != R, then what
> > sh
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:34:45AM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> If, using the definitions of N, B and R from the ID, B != R, then what should
> happen? If B < R I suppose the extra B's should be ignored but if R > B the
> most reasonable interpretation of the additional parameters seems to be
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:34:45AM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:36:44AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snm
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:36:44AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> > client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> > Get Range was defi
Dave,
I'm going to start reviewing the code this weekend. I'm unfamiliar
with the code so it will take me a while as well before I could bring
up design ideas.
As I said this is a tool for an academic project so I'll be on it anyhow.
I would be glad to have someone to share with ideas on implement
Dave Shield wrote:
>Wes, Robert, Thomas et al - what would your feelings be about
> including this sort of extension into the main Net-SNMP distribution?
> (via an explicit option to 'configure', of course).
No objections from my side.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.
On 25/01/07, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> > I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> > client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> > Get Range was defined in Internet Draft but was
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Yaniv S. wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> Get Range was defined in Internet Draft but wasn't approved as RFC.
I personally would very much app
On 24/01/07, Yaniv S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm Intrested to add an Implementation of get-range method to an snmp
> client for academic reasons (resarch and such).
> Get Range was defined in Internet Draft but wasn't approved as RFC.
> My question is whether I'm able to implement it as a dif
