On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:22:27 + Dave wrote:
DS> Any thoughts about reinstating the missing 'ifNumber'
DS> scalar object? (Bug #1399369)
Yes - d'oh!
I'll get it back in...
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid con
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:31 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
> You are quite right. It appears that I confused myself
> when adding the ifTableLastChange tracking, and deleted
> the ifLastChange code (it's in 5.2.x).
> I've just restored it for 5.3.1 and 5.4.
Thanks.
Any thoughts about reinstating th
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:00:50 + Dave wrote:
DS> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:38 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > DS> Note that the 5.3 release has introduced a new implementation
DS> > DS> of the ifTable. which does seem to
DS> > DS> support this object [ifLastChanged]. (Though I'm not totally
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:38 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
> DS> Note that the 5.3 release has introduced a new implementation
> DS> of the ifTable. which does seem to
> DS> support this object [ifLastChanged]. (Though I'm not totally
> DS> convinced it gets the value right).
>
> Any particular r
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:05:06 + Dave wrote:
DS> On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 16:21 +0800, Zax wrote:
DS> > 1.
DS> > ifLastChange is not implemented.
DS> > I want to implement it in my agent.
DS> > But I don't know how to get the time when the status is changed.
DS>
DS> Yup - that's probably why it has
Thank you!
I will see the newest version.
-
net-snmp version : 5.2.1
platform : i686
OS : debian 2.6.10
source install
using default options.
Thank you!
I will see the newest version.
-
net-snmp version : 5.2.1
platform : i686
OS : debian 2.6.10
source install
using default options.
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 16:21 +0800, Zax wrote:
> 1.
> ifLastChange is not implemented.
> I want to implement it in my agent.
> But I don't know how to get the time when the status is changed.
Yup - that's probably why it hasn't been implemented up to now :-)
Actually, that's not strictly true. It
