Dave Shield wrote:
> On 10 March 2010 14:29, Josef Moellers wrote:
>> I've just uploaded it:
>> net-snmp-Patches-2967400
>
> That patch has now been applied to the relevant code branches.
Many thanks.
Josef
--
These are my personal views and not those of Fujitsu Technology Solutions!
Josef Möl
On 10 March 2010 14:29, Josef Moellers wrote:
> I've just uploaded it:
> net-snmp-Patches-2967400
That patch has now been applied to the relevant code branches.
Dave
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new s
Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:00:22 +0100 Josef wrote:
> JM> > whoops... I meant attach it to the bug report!
> JM>
> JM> There is no bug report, as far as I know.
>
> Ah... then submitting the patch to the patch tracker is the best thing to do..
> http://net-snmp.org/patches/ shou
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:00:22 +0100 Josef wrote:
JM> > whoops... I meant attach it to the bug report!
JM>
JM> There is no bug report, as far as I know.
Ah... then submitting the patch to the patch tracker is the best thing to do..
http://net-snmp.org/patches/ should redirect you to the right place
Robert Story wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:48:54 +0100 Josef wrote:
> JM> > no, you should be able to just attach the new file... you might need to
> reopen
> JM> > the patch, as Dave probably closed it when he applied the last patch...
> JM>
> JM> OK, so here goes.
> JM>
> JM> The patch is at
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:48:54 +0100 Josef wrote:
JM> > no, you should be able to just attach the new file... you might need to
reopen
JM> > the patch, as Dave probably closed it when he applied the last patch...
JM>
JM> OK, so here goes.
JM>
JM> The patch is attached and it completely replaces th
Robert Story wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:01:46 +0100 Josef wrote:
> JM> How do I publish this patch? Do I have to do
> JM> special things to replace the original patch?
>
> no, you should be able to just attach the new file... you might need to reopen
> the patch, as Dave probably closed it wh
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:01:46 +0100 Josef wrote:
JM> How do I publish this patch? Do I have to do
JM> special things to replace the original patch?
no, you should be able to just attach the new file... you might need to reopen
the patch, as Dave probably closed it when he applied the last patch...
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 10 February 2010 11:02, Josef Moellers
> wrote:
I'd like to amend the etherlike-mib code for Linux
>> The patch (against 5.5) is appended.
>
> OK - that patch has been applied to the 5.5.x and main development branches.
Based upon the remarks of Stephen and the
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:36:39 +0100
> Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Josef Moellers
>> wrote:
>>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:44 +0100
Josef Moellers wrote:
[ ... ]
Ugh, I would prefer that you u
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:36:39 +0100
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Josef Moellers
> wrote:
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:44 +0100
> >> Josef Moellers wrote:
> >> [ ... ]
> >> Ugh, I would prefer that you use one of the other API's
> >> to
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Josef Moellers
wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:44 +0100
>> Josef Moellers wrote:
>> [ ... ]
>> Ugh, I would prefer that you use one of the other API's
>> to get information (like netlink IFLA_STATS) rather than open each sysfs
>> fi
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:44 +0100
> Josef Moellers wrote:
>
>> Dave Shield wrote:
>>> On 10 February 2010 09:23, Josef Moellers
>>> wrote:
I'd like to amend the etherlike-mib code for Linux
Any comment/objection while I locally write/test?
>>> Go right
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:44 +0100
Josef Moellers wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> > On 10 February 2010 09:23, Josef Moellers
> > wrote:
> >> I'd like to amend the etherlike-mib code for Linux
> >> Any comment/objection while I locally write/test?
> >
> > Go right ahead.
> > We look forward
On 10 February 2010 11:02, Josef Moellers wrote:
>>> I'd like to amend the etherlike-mib code for Linux
>
> The patch (against 5.5) is appended.
OK - that patch has been applied to the 5.5.x and main development branches.
Thanks
Dave
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 10 February 2010 09:23, Josef Moellers
> wrote:
>> I'd like to amend the etherlike-mib code for Linux
>> Any comment/objection while I locally write/test?
>
> Go right ahead.
> We look forward to seeing whatever you come up with.
The patch (against 5.5) is appended.
On 10 February 2010 09:23, Josef Moellers wrote:
> I'd like to amend the etherlike-mib code for Linux
> Any comment/objection while I locally write/test?
Go right ahead.
We look forward to seeing whatever you come up with.
Dave
---
17 matches
Mail list logo