Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-22 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 02:36:43PM -0400, Bill Fenner wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Wes Hardaker < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Bill Fenner writes: > > > > > So, +1 on committing Bart's patch, because it accomplishes the goal of > > > fixing the regression, with the

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-21 Thread Bill Fenner
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Wes Hardaker < [email protected]> wrote: > Bill Fenner writes: > > > So, +1 on committing Bart's patch, because it accomplishes the goal of > > fixing the regression, with the caveat that I really think that this > > whole area needs to be revisited.

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-21 Thread Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders
Bill Fenner writes: > So, +1 on committing Bart's patch, because it accomplishes the goal of > fixing the regression, with the caveat that I really think that this > whole area needs to be revisited. I think this comment is spot on. So I'd accept the patch too, though my gut reaction is to reve

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-20 Thread Bill Fenner
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2018 13:06:43 -0400 Bill wrote: > BF> I do not think that now is the time to try to deal with any of > BF> the fundamentals, but just not regress from previous released > BF> behavior, and deal with the underlying issue in 5.8.

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-20 Thread Robert Story
On Sun, 20 May 2018 13:06:43 -0400 Bill wrote: BF> I do not think that now is the time to try to deal with any of BF> the fundamentals, but just not regress from previous released BF> behavior, and deal with the underlying issue in 5.8.1 / 5.7.4. Just to clarify, do you mean a) accepts Bart's RF

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-20 Thread Bill Fenner
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Robert Story wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:07:56 -0700 Bart wrote: > BVA> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the > BVA> source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an > BVA> unterminated string to strlcpy(). > > I'm going to sa

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-20 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 05/19/18 21:18, Robert Story wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:07:56 -0700 Bart wrote: BVA> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the BVA> source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an BVA> unterminated string to strlcpy(). I'm going to say -1, but for the patch an

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-19 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:28:31PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/19/18 15:14, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source > > > argument > > > passed to strlcpy(). Henc

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-19 Thread Robert Story
On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:07:56 -0700 Bart wrote: BVA> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the BVA> source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an BVA> unterminated string to strlcpy(). I'm going to say -1, but for the patch and not the need to fix the issue. This co

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-19 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 05/19/18 15:14, Magnus Fromreide wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy(). Reported-by: Stuart Henderson Fi

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-19 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument > passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy(). > > Reported-by: Stuart Henderson > Fixes: 7f05daa8e0e0 ("CHANGES: BUG: 34

Re: [PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/05/19 14:07, Bart Van Assche wrote: > strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument > passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy(). > > Reported-by: Stuart Henderson > Fixes: 7f05daa8e0e0 ("CHANGES: BUG: 3444939: BUG: 1796886:

[PATCH; request for votes] snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() triggers a segmentation fault

2018-05-19 Thread Bart Van Assche
strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy(). Reported-by: Stuart Henderson Fixes: 7f05daa8e0e0 ("CHANGES: BUG: 3444939: BUG: 1796886: snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() emb

Re: Segmentation fault by netsnmp_request_add_list_data(...) function

2011-01-21 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:48:47PM +0300, Egor wrote: > I wrote my own simple MIB module, used mib2c.scalar.conf. So, I made my > example like delayed_instance.c. > this is received by gdb: > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > _int_malloc (av=, bytes=) at

Segmentation fault by netsnmp_request_add_list_data(...) function

2011-01-21 Thread Egor
netsnmp_set_request_error(reqinfo, requests, SNMP_ERR_UNDOFAILED); } DEBUGMSGTL(("simpleMib", "mode_set_undo_ok\n")); break; default: /* we should never get here, so this is a really bad error */ snm

Segmentation fault

2011-01-12 Thread Prakash
When I restarting my subagent I got this Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x76681765 in netsnmp_oid_find_prefix () from /usr/lib64/libnetsnmp.so.15 What might be the cause? Regards, Prakash Raju logo A leader in technology driven business solutions

Re: Segmentation Fault - NET-SNMP version: 5.4.2.1

2010-06-24 Thread Wes Hardaker
>Hi All > >I need your help to fix the following issue for Solaris box: >$ /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le >Segmentation Fault >$ ># /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le >Segmentation Fault (core dumped) ># Can you read the following web page and hopefully it'll h

Segmentation Fault - NET-SNMP version: 5.4.2.1

2010-06-24 Thread Gaurav Sharma
Hi All I need your help to fix the following issue for Solaris box: $ /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le Segmentation Fault $ # /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le Segmentation Fault (core dumped) # -- GAURAV SHARMA -- ThinkGeek

Re: Segmentation fault with snmptable command

2010-03-15 Thread Dave Shield
On 15 March 2010 10:27, Manjit wrote: > For some of the value(wrong values ) of mib-oid's snmptable is giving > segmentation fault. This is fixed by the patch to bug report #2837998 (SVN revision 17857) See http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp/trunk/net-snmp/apps/snm

Segmentation fault with snmptable command

2010-03-15 Thread Manjit
Hi All, For some of the value(wrong values ) of mib-oid's snmptable is giving segmentation fault. e.g [r...@localhost make]# snmptable -v 2c -c demopublic localhost .1 Segmentation fault [r...@localhost make]# snmptable -v 2c -c demopublic localhost .2 Was that a table? joint-iso-cci

return NULL in get_ routine cause segmentation fault?

2009-08-17 Thread Tewen Hsieh
Hi all, I used mib2c.iterate_access.conf to generate my template code. (net-enmp 5.1.1) I find that if it return NULL in get_ routine, there will be a segmentation fault. Is it a normal result? If it can *not* return NULL in get_ routine, how can I indivate there's an error occured

Re: Segmentation fault (core dumped) problem

2009-04-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:20 PM, sanjaykumar wrote: >  I am facing following following crash problem .....Segmentation fault (core > dumped) > > following is the trace file > Please suggest me , what could be the reason for this You should first analyze your program with Valgri

Segmentation fault (core dumped) problem

2009-04-27 Thread sanjaykumar
Hi  I am facing following following crash problem .Segmentation fault (core dumped) following is the trace file Please suggest me , what could be the reason for this Thanks and regards, Sanjay gdb ./packetcable_mta core.28328 GNU gdb 6.6 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-10 Thread down Load
.4.2.1 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xd410 in ?? () (gdb) print HRFS_entry $1 = 538191076 (gdb) print *HRFS_entry $2 = 538188396 (gdb) print storage_type_id $3 = {1, 3, 6, 1, 2, 1, 25, 2, 1, 1} (gdb) print storage_type_len $4 = 10 (gdb) print storage_type_id[ storage_t

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-08 Thread Dave Shield
2009/4/8 down Load : > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0xd410 in ?? () Hmmm that's not really very informative. I'd hoped to get something a little more meaningful as to exactly which line was triggering the problem. > 4) (gdb) print HRFS_ent

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-08 Thread down Load
:00 gdb snmpd     root 3408016 1179872   0 17:36:58  pts/1  0:00 /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le 3) when run snmpget  error show like below Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xd410 in ?? () 4) (gdb) print HRFS_entry $1 = 538197124 (gdb) print *HRFS_entry $2 = 53819 (gdb) pr

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-08 Thread Dave Shield
2009/4/8 down Load : > 1)  /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le -Dall > trace: header_hrstoreEntry(): host/hr_storage.c, 476: > host/hr_storage: var_hrstoreEntry: process > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.45 () > Segmentation fault(coredump) Yup - that's what I suspe

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-08 Thread down Load
URCES-MIB::hrStorageType.43 (index 44 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.44 (index 45 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.45 trace: header_hrstoreEntry(): host/hr_storage.c, 476: host/hr_storage: var_hrstoreEntry: process HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.45 (ffff) Segmentation fault(cor

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-08 Thread down Load
orageType.45 > host/hr_storage: var_hrstoreEntry: process >    HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.45 () OK - that helps a bit. We at least know that the problem occurs after this point. > Segmentation fault(coredump) Can you please try the following:     1)  /usr/local/sbin

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-08 Thread Dave Shield
2009/4/8 down Load : > Hi All, > > 1) /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le -D > /usr/local/sbin/snmpd: option requires an argument -- D Sorry - that should have been "-Dall" The point is to turn on *all* debugging output (as I said yesterday - this is a lot!) and see what happens just before the crash. A

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-07 Thread Dave Shield
-MIB::hrStorageType.45 () OK - that helps a bit. We at least know that the problem occurs after this point. > Segmentation fault(coredump) Can you please try the following: 1) /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le -D Note that this will produce a *lot* of output. Wait until it ha

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-07 Thread down Load
43 .HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.43 (index 44 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.44 (index 45 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.45 host/hr_storage: var_hrstoreEntry: process HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType..45 (ffff) Segmentation fault(coredump) 2)(in a separate terminal). /usr/

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-07 Thread Dave Shield
2009/4/6 Dave Shield : > Can you try re-starting the agent using the command > >   /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le -Dhost/hr_storage > > and then run > >  snmpget -v 1 -c public localhost hrStorageDescr..45 > > again (in a separate terminal). That last one should have been snmpget -v 1 -c publi

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-06 Thread down Load
t -v 1 -c public localhost hrStorageDescr..45 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.45 = STRING: /oracle/DEV/origlogA Best Regards,   From: Dave Shield To: down Load Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 6, 20

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-06 Thread Dave Shield
2009/4/3 down Load : > 4)/usr/local/bin#./snmpgetnext -v 1 -c public localhost hrStorageIndex.44 > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.45 = INTEGER: 45 > 5)/usr/local/bin#./snmpget -v 1 -c public localhost hrStorageIndex.45 > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.45 = INTEGER: 45 > 6)/usr/local/bin#./s

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-03 Thread Thomas Anders
down Load wrote: > 7)/usr/local/bin#./snmpget -v 1 -c public localhost hrStorageType.45 > Timeout: No Response from localhost. > 8)/usr/local/bin#ps -ef|grep snmpd > root 1134822 3330148 0 17:24:29 pts/1 0:00 grep snmpd > > 9)/usr/local/bin#uname -a > AIX sapdev 3 5 0008B7BED700 Sounds l

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-03 Thread down Load
ceforge.net Sent: Friday, April 3, 2009 4:30:32 PM Subject: Re: Segmentation fault(coredump) down Load wrote: > NET-SNMP version 5.4.2.1 What system/OS are you running net-snmp on? ("uname -a) What's

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-03 Thread Thomas Anders
down Load wrote: > NET-SNMP version 5.4.2.1 What system/OS are you running net-snmp on? ("uname -a) What's the output of "net-snmp-config --configure-options"? +Thomas -- ___

Re: Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-03 Thread Dave Shield
2009/4/3 down Load : > 2) i run snmpwalk and found > Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [0.0.0.0]->[127.0.0.1]:-26649 >   GETNEXT message >     -- HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.44 > Segmentation fault(coredump) What is the next entry after row 44? I.e. what is the output of

Segmentation fault(coredump)

2009-04-03 Thread down Load
Hi All, 1) I run  #/usr/local/sbin/snmpd -d -f -L -c /usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf NET-SNMP version 5.4.2.1 2) i run snmpwalk and found Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [0.0.0.0]->[127.0.0.1]:-26649   GETNEXT message     -- HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.44 Segmentation fault(cored

Re: Segmentation fault while running snmpd in MIPS64 bit processor

2007-07-05 Thread Robert Story
[ First - *please* don't mail me directly. Keep discussions on the list, where others can both learn and offer advice. Thanks. ] On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:53:10 +0530 Ansa wrote: AA> I wasn't do any debugging . AA> It was not giving any error messages.Only Segmentat

Re: Segmentation fault while running snmpd in MIPS64 bit processor

2007-07-05 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:20:56 +0530 Ansa wrote: AA> I am getting Segmentation Fault while running snmpd in MIPS64 bit AA> Processor. We are going to need a little bit more information that you have provided. For example, a stack trace would be very helpful. Any error messages? When do

Segmentation fault while running snmpd in MIPS64 bit processor

2007-07-05 Thread Ansa Ahammed
Hi, I am getting Segmentation Fault while running snmpd in MIPS64 bit Processor. I have Cross-Compiled the net-snmp-5.4 for MIPS64 bit Processor using the following configuration Options. RANLIB=mips64-octeon-linux-gnu-ranlib LD=mips64-octeon-linux-gnu-gcc ./configure --with-cc=mips64

Empty Table Walk Segmentation Fault

2007-02-16 Thread Ahmed, Ali
Hi All, I think the table_info->colnum is not properly set when a walk/get_next/get is issued for an empty table. The code lines in question are table_iterator.c Line 706 and Line 747. Kindly provide feedback. The fault is reproducible by generating a table using mib2c iterator table configur

snmpNotifyFilterRowStatus Segmentation Fault in 5.3.1

2007-01-28 Thread Emi . Yanagi
Dear net-snmp-coders, I was able to reproduce RowStatus segmentation fault with snmpNotifyFilterRowStatus in 5.3.1 master agent. This problem can be easily reproduced by the following steps: $ snmpset 10.1 snmpNotifyFilterRowStatus.3.65.66.67.1 i 4 SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-08-08 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:42:39 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EYC> Yes, I was running with -Dall option when "Broken pipe" happened. Then EYC> what is the condition that -Dall will not cause "Broken pipe"? -D is debug output, but is not actually running under a debugger. EYC> If running without deb

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-28 Thread Emi . Yanagi
Robert, Yes, I was running with -Dall option when "Broken pipe" happened. Then what is the condition that -Dall will not cause "Broken pipe"? If running without debug option, snmpwalk on etherStatsDataSource works okay now. Thanks for the patch, it fixed the mib2c oid typ

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-27 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:34:37 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EYC> trace: netsnmp_unix_send(): snmpUnixDomain.c, 160: EYC> netsnmp_unix: send 20 bytes to 0x80bbfe0 on fd 5 EYC> Broken pipe Were you running in a debugger? A broken pipe would be if either side shut down the connections (maybe because

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-26 Thread Emi . Yanagi
forge.net To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [email protected] Subject Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:21:46 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not to non-zero, but something greater than 10. I don't know

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-25 Thread Robert Story
e strange thing is if I not set etherStatsDataSource_len, the subagent EYC> works just fine. Only when I set etherStatsDataSource_len to none-zero it EYC> causes segmentation fault. Not to non-zero, but something greater than 10. I don't know how I haven't run across this in my

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-22 Thread Emi . Yanagi
e: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:10:38 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > what release are you running? I am using 5.2.1 release. > Did you accept all the defaults? I accepted all the defaults except the last question I c

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-22 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:10:38 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EYC> It's easy to reproduce the problem in two steps: For you, maybe, not for me. I should have asked before, what release are you running? EYC> 1. Generate mib2c template for etherStatsTable using mib2c.mfd.conf , Did you accept all th

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-21 Thread Emi . Yanagi
Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/21/2005 06:52 AM Please respond to [email protected] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [email protected] Subject Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource On Wed, 20 J

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-21 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:47:33 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EYC> This is hard-coded just as the piece of code I copy&pasted in my email. Ok, where is it? What function? EYC> RMON-MIB::etherStatsDataSource = Wrong Type (should be OBJECT IDENTIFIER): EYC> Variable has bad type Which is odd, since

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-20 Thread Emi . Yanagi
net Subject Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:32:59 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EYC> I have implemented several subagents for BRIDGE-MIB tables using mib2c and EYC> mib2c.mfd.conf. They all worked well. Now I came acr

Re: mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-20 Thread Robert Story
If I EYC> don't set etherStatsDataSource and let it be the default 0.0, the EYC> etherStatsTable subagent works okay. But if I set etherStatsDataSource_len EYC> to something not 0 (such as in the following code), it will cause EYC> segmentation fault. Here is the code which set e

mib2c for oid type cause segmentation fault, e.g. etherStatsDataSource

2005-07-20 Thread Emi . Yanagi
, the etherStatsTable subagent works okay. But if I set etherStatsDataSource_len to something not 0 (such as in the following code), it will cause segmentation fault. Here is the code which set etherStatsDataSource in etherStatsTable_cache_load(netsnmp_container * container): oid etherStatsDataS

Re: Segmentation fault with ifXTable

2004-10-26 Thread Coders
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:19:52 +0530 Karthikeyan wrote: KN> I am using netsnmp5.2Pre3 release in linux enviornment. I am getting the KN> following segementation fault when I run the agent (after including KN> ifXTable support): KN> KN> netsnmp_assert ((void *)0) != _ifXTable_container_get() failed K

Segmentation fault with ifXTable

2004-10-26 Thread Karthikeyan N
() failed if-mib/ifXTable/ifXTable.c:112 initialize_table_ifXTable() Segmentation fault Initially I used configure script by adding ifXTable mib modules such as follows: ./configure -with-mib-modules="if-mib/ifTable if-mib/ifXTable" Then, I rn make and make install. Please let me know is