On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:18 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:33:00 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> > said:
>
> >> You mean like:
>
> Whoops. Ha.
>
> MF> But that one affects the logs on line 917 and 934 (of snmp_agent.c).
>
> MF> I am talking about the log on line 831
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:33:00 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
>> You mean like:
Whoops. Ha.
MF> But that one affects the logs on line 917 and 934 (of snmp_agent.c).
MF> I am talking about the log on line 831 which is controlled by the global
MF> variable log_addresses which is enabl
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 19:12 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > I think at this point we should have a config token that at least allows
> > turning off the logging entirely (which can then also shutdown the cache
> > maintenance).
>
> You mean like:
>
> foo# snmpd -H 2>&1 | gre
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I think at this point we should have a config token that at least allows
> turning off the logging entirely (which can then also shutdown the cache
> maintenance).
You mean like:
foo# snmpd -H 2>&1 | grep -i dontlog
dontLogTCPWrappersConnects (1|yes|true|0|no|false)
foo#
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:22:52 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> I have now looked further and it seems that the function of the address
MF> cache is to rate limit the number of
MF> LOG_INFO: Received SNMP packet(s) from
Yep. That was put in because of the number of people that had
2009/8/23 Magnus Fromreide :
> I have now looked further and it seems that the function of the address
> cache is to rate limit the number of
> LOG_INFO: Received SNMP packet(s) from
> log messages
Oh, the line 'snmp_log(LOG_INFO, "Received SNMP packet(s) from %s\n",
addr);'? I thought that loggi
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:22 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:43 -0700, dan anderson wrote:
> > I'm looking at net-snmp-5.4.2/agent/snmp_agent.c and addrCache within.
> > As far as I can tell, while this cache is initialized and maintained
> >
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:43 -0700, dan anderson wrote:
> I'm looking at net-snmp-5.4.2/agent/snmp_agent.c and addrCache within.
> As far as I can tell, while this cache is initialized and maintained
> by the agent, it's never actually *accessed* beyond keeping it up to
> d
I'm looking at net-snmp-5.4.2/agent/snmp_agent.c and addrCache within.
As far as I can tell, while this cache is initialized and maintained
by the agent, it's never actually *accessed* beyond keeping it up to
date. Is this vestigial code that the agent has evolved past needing?
In
