On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Srinivas wrote:
SA> sorry i didnt mean that.
SA> i want to use the async interface without making this
SA> call synchronous as this daemon is responsible for
SA> other things as well.
I didn't mean make the daemon synchronous, I mean make the sub-agent call
sorry i didnt mean that.
i want to use the async interface without making this
call synchronous as this daemon is responsible for
other things as well.
thanks
ATG
--- Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Srinivas
> wrote:
> SA> I cannt make it synchr
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Srinivas wrote:
SA> I cannt make it synchronous.
Sure you can. Instead of calling xxx_async(), write a wrapper:
int xxx_sync()
{
rc = xxx_async();
if(rc) handle_error();
rc = xxx_wait_for_async_results();
if(rc) handle_error();
return rc;
}
I cannt make it synchronous.
could you give me some pointers as to how u would go
about doing it?
or i could come up with a plan and ask your opinion.
thanks
Srinivas
--- Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Srinivas
> wrote:
> SA>I have a suba
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Srinivas wrote:
SA>I have a subagent which needs to talk to an
SA> internal daemon using a asynchronous request/response
SA> mechanism.
I think you are going to have to make the communication synchronous.
SA> And also to make matters worse, I dont have
hi all,
I have a subagent which needs to talk to an
internal daemon using a asynchronous request/response
mechanism. The problem is, I am using baby-steps
handler and i am inside one of its state. I cannt set
the request to 'delegated' state as this is only
handled by the outside set state machi
