Re: clarification in net snmp

2011-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy. Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn and offer advice. Thanks. ] On 7 Feb

Re: clarification in net snmp

2011-01-23 Thread Dave Shield
some of the necessary information. > 2).I need a some clarification on using the datatype for octetstring. >   when i searched in net it doesn't show that octetstring datatype, > How i will pass the datatype for octetstring so, that netsnmp access the > value? What exactly do y

clarification in net snmp

2011-01-21 Thread deepa ramar
net-snmp validate. 2).I need a some clarification on using the datatype for octetstring. when i searched in net it doesn't show that octetstring datatype, How i will pass the datatype for octetstring so, that netsnmp access the value? What is the format of octet string?I searched in ne

Re: Clarification about run_alarms() function

2010-05-13 Thread Manjit
Hi Robert/All, The issue was because of some changes made by myself as per my requirements. So there is not such leak. Sorry for this. Robert, as you said that netsnmp allocates memory that isn't explicitly removed until shutdown. What happens when the snmpd goes for a reconfig not shutdown. Plea

Re: Clarification about run_alarms() function

2010-05-11 Thread Manjit
Hi Robert, Thanks for the reply. Please find below the valgrind report for the growing leak : a) Below report when snmp is up and running : 255 (108 direct, 147 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 105 of 153 ==20680== at 0x4004864: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:279) ==206

Re: Clarification about run_alarms() function

2010-05-10 Thread Robert Story
On Fri, 07 May 2010 17:36:18 +0530 Manjit wrote: M> ==698==by 0x84BD990: ipAddressTable_container_load M> Please provide me information for the below queries : M> 1. what is the purpose of run_alarms() ? Just what is says... It runs alarms, or events. M> 2. How the system will be affected if

Clarification about run_alarms() function

2010-05-07 Thread Manjit
Hi All, I am running net-snmp ( version 5.4.2.1 ) as a thread and currently working on the removal of memory leak. I find a big leak w.r.t the function run_alrams() : -- 10,285 (4,356 direct, 5,929 indirect) bytes in 121 bloc

Re: Clarification regarding view/user/community names..

2010-03-04 Thread Dave Shield
On 4 March 2010 14:23, wrote: > What is the maximum permissible viewname, username, groupname and > communityname that can be configured when using net-snmp? The group name and view name are limited to 32 characters. See the definitions of these objects in the SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB. I don't b

Clarification regarding view/user/community names..

2010-03-04 Thread srikapilan.gandhi
Hi, What is the maximum permissible viewname, username, groupname and communityname that can be configured when using net-snmp? I am using NET-SNMP version 5.4.1.2, I am facing issues when I use names greater than 31 characters. Please suggest the max limit for these ( viewname, username, g

Re: Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation

2010-03-04 Thread Dave Shield
On 4 March 2010 04:22, Prasanna Varadharajan wrote: > So in createAndWait approach first the user has to enter the rowStatus object > with > value 5(for createAndWait) and followed by rest of the row creation objects, Not quite. When creating a row using 'createAndWait', the RowStatus assignmen

RE: Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation

2010-03-03 Thread Prasanna Varadharajan
Thanks all for the inputs. Thanks, Prasanna From: Robert Story [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:26 AM To: Prasanna Varadharajan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Clarification required on createAndGo

Re: Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation

2010-03-03 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:52:10 +0530 Prasanna wrote: PV> Because if the user sets the table objects first and then set the rowStatus with 4 or 5 means then there is no difference between createAndWait and createAndGo approach. Please provide your comments on this. There is a big difference. A suc

RE: Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation

2010-03-03 Thread Prasanna Varadharajan
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation createAndWait - 1. manager first issue sets to create the rows, followed by gets to verify that the intended row has been created. 2. Once the manager has verified all information, a MIB variabl

Re: Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation

2010-03-03 Thread Manjit
createAndWait - 1. manager first issue sets to create the rows, followed by gets to verify that the intended row has been created. 2. Once the manager has verified all information, a MIB variable in the row is set to activate the inforamtion. createAndGo - the manager issues the set operations n

Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation

2010-03-03 Thread Prasanna Varadharajan
Hi All, This query is regarding createAndWait and createAndGo approach implementation in snmp agent. It may be the implementation specific to support these; however we would like to know the standard way which is in practice. Please let me know whether the following process is correct or not?,

Re: Need clarification regarding Mac Address as Index

2010-02-08 Thread Sasikumar
Hi Dave, Thank you for the providing the solution. It was registered as ASN_OCTET_STR when code was generated using mib2c. It works properly with ASN_PRIV_IMPLIED_OCTET_STR Regards, Sasikumar.B --- On Mon, 8/2/10, Dave Shield wrote: > From: Dave Shield > Subject: Re: Need clarifi

Re: Need clarification regarding Mac Address as Index

2010-02-08 Thread Dave Shield
On 8 February 2010 05:00, Sasikumar wrote: >    I am implementing Q-BRIDGE-MIB in this table is dot1qTpFdbTable > which as dot1qTpFdbAddress as one of the Index. > My question is when this table was queried the output contains > length of the Mac address, Is this valid. No. You are quite correct.

Need clarification regarding Mac Address as Index

2010-02-07 Thread Sasikumar
Hi All,    I am implementing Q-BRIDGE-MIB in this table is dot1qTpFdbTable which as dot1qTpFdbAddress as one of the Index. My question is when this table was queried the output contains length of the Mac address, Is this valid. Since length is present if the index(string) whose length is variabl

coding clarification

2009-08-26 Thread ashutosh shanker
Hi, I am try to implement the SNMP manager and agent and implementing the get, set and trap functionality using NET-SNMP package in C++. I thought of monitoring the status of ten TCP/IP ports. Hope you can help me with that. I will be highly grateful to you. Regards Ashutosh -

Re: UCD MIB Clarification

2008-06-05 Thread Dave Shield
Chris Freeman wrote: > Hello, > > What exactly are the ssCPURaw items measuring? "CPU ticks" spent in each of the listed modes. > The numbers always go up, it seems, That's correct. These are the raw counters (hence the name) - they will always increase. > so a dynamic usage of the CPU section

UCD MIB Clarification

2008-06-05 Thread Chris Freeman
Hello, I've been working with the UCD MIB a bit, and wondered if this is the right place for a bit of clarification. What exactly are the ssCPURaw items measuring? I've looked at SLES 9 and 10 (which use net-snmp-5.1-80 and net-snmp-5.4-rc2-6, respectively) as well as the RedHat di

clarification

2007-09-17 Thread Yoav Bar-Yosef
Hello, sorry but I wasn't clear enough about my question - I meant for the ToS bits in the trap packets that the agent sends Thanks Yoav - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual

Re: Hai need some clarification in the c++ sources of net SNMP

2007-04-27 Thread Dave Shield
On 27/04/07, rajasekhar kavuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > register_config_handler("snmptrapd", "createUser", > usm_parse_create_usmUser, NULL, >"username (MD5|SHA) passphrase [DES > [passphrase]]"); > register_config_handler("snmptrapd",

Hai need some clarification in the c++ sources of net SNMP

2007-04-27 Thread rajasekhar kavuri
Hai, register_config_handler("snmptrapd", "createUser", usm_parse_create_usmUser, NULL, "username (MD5|SHA) passphrase [DES [passphrase]]"); register_config_handler("snmptrapd", "usmUser", usm_parse_config_usmUser