On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:25:38 -0800 Wes wrote:
WH> Robert> It came up in IRC. Someone wanted a read-only system that
WH> Robert> couldn't turn into a read-write system if misconfigured.
WH>
WH> Or, um, intentionally configured it but he didn't want them to have
WH> those privileges?
That too, I su
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:29:31 -0500, Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> It came up in IRC. Someone wanted a read-only system that
Robert> couldn't turn into a read-write system if misconfigured.
Or, um, intentionally configured it but he didn't want them to have
t
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:59:46 -0800 Wes wrote:
WH> Robert> mention new option to disable set requests
WH>
WH> Um, what's the purpose of this? I am some what hesitant about
WH> implementing something like this since I'd bet (not having looked at
WH> the code admittedly) that it doesn't properly cha
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:16:45 -0800, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> mention new option to disable set requests
Um, what's the purpose of this? I am some what hesitant about
implementing something like this since I'd bet (not having looked at
the code admittedly) that it does
