2008/11/20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't see 5.3.0.1. I see 5.3.2.3 is available.
>
> But, I have requirement for 5.3.0.1.
The main download page deliberately only lists the most
recent version of each development line.
The link
"Sourceforge download page - all files"
was intended to
i think u can find it in the below link:
http://www.net-snmp.org/download.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to download net-snmp5.3.0.1, I could not find the source
> package( the .gz).
> Where can I download the net-snmp 5.3.0.1 source.
>
> Kindly help
[email protected]
Subject: Re: net-snmp 5.3.0.1
i think u can find it in the below link:
http://www.net-snmp.org/download.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to download net-snmp5.3.0.1, I could not find the source
> package( the .gz).
> Where can I downl
Hi,
I need to download net-snmp5.3.0.1, I could not find the source package(
the .gz).
Where can I download the net-snmp 5.3.0.1 source.
Kindly help me out.
Thanks & Regards,
Kapil.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsore
Thomas,
I tried your approach.
I reproduced the coredump using Net-SNMP 5.4. The stack trace is below:
Thanks,
Mark
NET-SNMP version: 5.4
Web: http://www.net-snmp.org/
Email: [email protected]
#0 netsnmp_add_varbind_to_cache (asp=0x8187958, vbcount=1,
varbind_ptr=0x815bc9
I am using Net-SNMP 5.3.0.1 Agent in Master-Subagent architecture. I created
a subagent and I ran some tests (a walk of the subagent tree every 60
seconds) twice and both the times, the Master Agent coredumped after around
15-20 hours.
Is this a known bug?
(My subagent was okay even after the
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:18:03 -0400 Jacob M wrote:
GJM> Thanks, Thomas. I just gave 5.3.1.rc1 a try and received the same
GJM> warnings... plus a few more :)
GJM>
GJM> if-mib/ifTable/ifTable_interface.c:1412: warning: cast from pointer to
GJM> integer of different size
GJM> if-mib/ifTable/ifTable_i
Grossman, Jacob M wrote:
> From: Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Grossman, Jacob M wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to build net-snmp-5.3.0.1 on 64bit Linux RHEL3 and am
>>>> receiving a bunch of 64bit related warnings from the compiler. Are
>>&
From: Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Grossman, Jacob M wrote:
>> > I'm trying to build net-snmp-5.3.0.1 on 64bit Linux RHEL3 and am
>> > receiving a bunch of 64bit related warnings from the compiler. Are
>> > there any patches to address this i
Grossman, Jacob M wrote:
> I'm trying to build net-snmp-5.3.0.1 on 64bit Linux RHEL3 and am
> receiving a bunch of 64bit related warnings from the compiler. Are there
> any patches to address this issue?
Try 5.3.1.rc1.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at
Title: Building net-snmp-5.3.0.1 on 64bit Linux RHEL3
Hi,
I'm trying to build net-snmp-5.3.0.1 on 64bit Linux RHEL3 and am receiving a bunch of 64bit related warnings from the compiler. Are there any patches to address this issue?
Details below.
Thanks,
- Jacob
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 11 May 2006 14:28:12 + Claus wrote:
CK> the snmpd crashes while startup on ppc.
It has nothing to do with ppc. It's an older kernel that doesn't have a
'processor' line in /proc/cpuinfo. Fixed for 5.3.1, patch attached.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, wil
nel.
Jayson
From: Johannes Schmidt-Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jayson Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Net-SNMP 5.3.0.1 on aix 5.2 5.3 and possibly 5.1
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:09:53 +0200
Jayson,
I presume that walking the iptable
Hi,
the snmpd crashes while startup on ppc.
I found a possible problem in
net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent/mibgroup/hardware/cpu/cpu_linux.c,
but with or without my fix, the snmpd crashes.
What may I do to fix this problem?
claus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# strace -e open,read snmpd -f
open("
Thanks for the information on the previous thread. I'll go take a look
> at it.
>
>
> Jayson
>
>
>> From: Johannes Schmidt-Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Jayson Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> CC:
>> [email protected]
yson Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC:
[email protected],[email protected]
Subject: Re: Net-SNMP 5.3.0.1 on aix 5.2 5.3 and possibly 5.1
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 18:38:32 +0200
Jayson,
there has been a discussion about 32-bit and 64-bit kernels about 3
months
mpiled on a 32 bit aix kernel to work on the aix
> 64 bit kernel.
>
> Jayson
>
>
>> From: "Jayson Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> [email protected],[email protected]
>>
>> Subject: Net
ROTECTED]>
To:
[email protected],[email protected]
Subject: Net-SNMP 5.3.0.1 on aix 5.2 5.3 and possibly 5.1
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 10:24:22 -0400
Okay all,
Another weird one, perhaps someone has seen this. I have compiled Net-SNMP
5.3.0.1 on aix 5.1/5.2
rwilcox wrote:
snmptrapd is no longer timing out on a regular
interval in 5.3.0.1 (as compared to 5.2.1).
There's an official patch (1420758) for this problem.
See www.net-snmp.org/official_patches .
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-
Hello,
snmptrapd is no longer timing out on a regular
interval in 5.3.0.1 (as compared to 5.2.1). In
reviewing the code, I see that the code used to do
some initialization for AGENTX that setup an alarm.
The alarm prevented snmp_select_info from setting
block to 1. Setting block to 1 causes s
Do not know if this the right forum to pose these questions, but here it
goes :
>1. Compiled net-snmp-5.3.0.1 on solaris 10 on SPARC platform using Sun
Studio 11 compiler suite.
Sorry, can't help you there - it works with gcc.
>2.Once net-snmp, thus compiled and installed, I trie
Hi Gurus
Do not know if this the right forum to pose these questions, but here it goes :
1. Compiled net-snmp-5.3.0.1 on solaris 10 on SPARC platform using Sun Studio
11 compiler suite. When configure is run, it does not recognize that struct
rt_entry in net/route.h has rt_dst as an element
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 09:57 -0700, Bruce Shaw wrote:
> > Now that turns out to be one of the opportunities to suggest that we
> > move from CVS to SVN first. Renaming in CVS is a missing
> > feature at best.
>
> Is SVN the best/only choice? Another group I'm involved with is
> considering other
Bruce Shaw wrote:
Now that turns out to be one of the opportunities to suggest that we
move from CVS to SVN first. Renaming in CVS is a missing
feature at best.
Is SVN the best/only choice? Another group I'm involved with is considering
others, including Mercurial.
At the very least it's th
> Now that turns out to be one of the opportunities to suggest that we
> move from CVS to SVN first. Renaming in CVS is a missing
> feature at best.
Is SVN the best/only choice? Another group I'm involved with is considering
others, including Mercurial.
This communication is intended for the u
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:37 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> Ok so we're going to rename those files?
I'd vote for that.
The current names include a certain amount of redundancy, even
if we basically stick with the full names of MIBs and/or tables.
I'm personally not convinced that's necess
Wes Hardaker wrote:
Ok so we're going to rename those files? Note that we need
to account for pre releases too which means net-snmp-5.3.0.1.pre1 is a
valid directory name. That actually brings us up to 25 files if I did
the math right:
Now that turns out to be one o
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:09:19 +, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent/mibgroup/ is 33 characters, so that
Dave> would still leave us 60+ to play with. There's no real reason
Dave> why we have to stick to the exact names
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:38 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I wonder if we should be actually not using >100 char path names
Seconded.
net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent/mibgroup/ is 33 characters, so that
would still leave us 60+ to play with. There's no real reason
why we have to stick to the
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:50:28 +0100, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Thomas> Violently agreed. Unfortunately it looks as if we're currently
Thomas> packing the net-snmp source distribution in a proprietary,
Thomas> non-POSIX-compliant (GNU) tar format which will cause pain for
Johannes Schmidt-Fischer wrote:
It seems to be a problem with too long file names in the source tarball.
When inspecting the tarball with HP-UX's tar you see some file names
"././@LongLink" following seemingly too long file names in the "tar -tv"
listing. This is the case for the following two di
Behalf Of Johannes
Schmidt-Fischer
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:39 AM
To: Thomas Anders
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: hpux11 with net-snmp 5.3.0.1 compike fail
Thomas Anders wrote:
> Pike, David wrote:
>
>> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
>&
se unpack with GNU tar instead of HP-UX tar.
It seems to be a problem with too long file names in the source tarball.
When inspecting the tarball with HP-UX's tar you see some file names
"././@LongLink" following seemingly too long file names in the "tar -tv"
listing. T
Pike, David wrote:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target
`mibgroup/snmp-notification-mib/snmpNotifyFilterTable/snmpNotifyFilterTable_interface.h',
needed by `mib_modules.lo'. Stop.
Sounds like a tar problem. Please unpack with GNU tar instead of HP-UX tar.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.an
1 -c
mibII/vacm_context.c -o mibII/vacm_context.o >/dev/null 2>&1
mv -f mibII/.libs/vacm_context.lo mibII/vacm_context.lo
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/dpike/net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent/mibgroup'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `mibgroup/snmp-notification-mib/snmpNotifyFilterTa
*** [host/hr_network.lo] Error 1make[2]: Leaving directory
`/cygdrive/p/net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent/mibgroup'make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error
1make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/p/net-snmp-5.3.0.1/agent'make:
*** [subdirs] Error 1
Any ideas on what I
could change?
I did the ./configure with
hi,
i was asked to provide a summary of all problems, we ran into so far:
first issue:
this is the first crash i encountered.
it only happens on bigendian 64bit arches.
http://pixel.global-banlist.de./bt.txt
i applied the following patch to fix it:
[[[
Index: agent/agent_registry.c
For those who aren't subscribed to the net-snmp-announce list:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:25:27 -0800
From: Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: SECURITY FIX: net-snmp 5.3.0.1 is released
In version 5.3
38 matches
Mail list logo
