sh_cache is injected.
And I really don't want to put special-case code into
'netsnmp_inject_handler' !
Wes> Why not parallel the way the bulk_to_next handler does it?
Because that's relevant for *every* handler chain - it's not
tightly linked to a particular helper.
I
handlers, and inject these two into the handler chain
that'd be acceptable in my eyes.
Dave> [ assuming 'netsnmp_inject_handler' supports
Dave> working with more than one handler, of course ]
But that'd need to be fixed, as I don't think it does.
Dave>
the stash_cache and stash_to_next
handlers, and inject these two into the handler chain
[ assuming 'netsnmp_inject_handler' supports
working with more than one handler, of course ]
c) Merge 'stash_to_next' into the main stash_cache helper
Oh, and I
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:52:00 +, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> Firstly, adding this stash-caching to an existing MIB
Dave> relies on injecting the stash-cache handler *after* having
Dave> registered the handler chain with the main agent (so that
Dave> the stash-cache kicks i
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:54:44 + Dave wrote:
DS> > Maybe netsnmp_inject_handler_before() ?
DS>
DS> I wondered about that.
DS> The main reason I didn't use that API is that it seemed a bit
DS> inefficient to search the handler chain when I already knew
DS> where I wanted the new handler to go!
W
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 14:37, Robert Story wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:52:00 + Dave wrote:
> DS> Secondly, I've tweaked the stash-cache handler to automatically
> DS> inject the new stash-to-next handler into the chain if it
> DS> detects that this is needed. This involved manipulating the
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:52:00 + Dave wrote:
DS> Secondly, I've tweaked the stash-cache handler to automatically
DS> inject the new stash-to-next handler into the chain if it
DS> detects that this is needed. This involved manipulating the
DS> 'next' and 'prev' links directly, which feels:
DS>
Wes,
as you may have noticed, I've just submitted a couple of
patches to extend the behaviour of your "stash_cache" helper,
and allow it to work with stash-ignorant MIB modules.
But there are a couple of things I wanted to check with you
regarding the basic handler-cha
