> 2) I never liked the 5.2.pre0 idea because we were never sure what the
>next version would be.
I think that's still the case, in fact.
For example, what will the "next version" on the 5.1.x line be?
net-snmp-5.1.2.pre3
net-snmp-5.1.2.rc1
net-snmp-5.1.2
(and could we
> DS> Bottom line:
> DS> If I do:
> DS> tar zxf net-snmp-5.1.2.tar.gz
> DS> cd net-snmp-5.1.2
>
> That would be 5.2.0...
Yup - of course. Silly mistake.
> DS> ./configure
> DS> make
> DS> make install
> DS> snmpd
> DS> snm
Hi
I refer to the windows project found in the 'old' "net-snmp-5.1"
package.
Best regards
Vincenzo
PS: Thank you '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' for your patience
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefi
Hi!!,
Can anyone
tell me how GetNext and GetBulk functions. .I mean does GetNext and
GetBulk functions column-wise in case of a table or row-wise..
If possible if anyone can give a link which
explains the proper functionality of GETNEXT and GETBULK
functionality.
Rega
> does GetNext and GetBulk functions column-wise in case of a table
> or row-wise..
They both walk the full length of each column (i.e. the value from
each row) before moving on to the next column.
Did you think of actually trying this with an existing agent,
to see what it does in practise?
DS> The cache itself isn't
DS> normally available explicitly, except by re-casting the 'magic' pointer
DS> (which feels as if it ought to be private to the handler internals).
Robert> By 'magic' you mean 'myvoid', right?
Err... yes, probably.
DS> I think the pipeline has some advantages - it's somewhat more flexible
DS> in terms of exactly when and where the next handler is called,
DS> and what (if anything) is done afterwards.
Robert> I don't think what I'm proposing takes away any flexibility.
Ok - maybe an example would help.
Suppo
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:25:32 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > 2) I never liked the 5.2.pre0 idea because we were never sure what the
DS> >next version would be.
Good point. I had forgotten major version bumps. Of course, there's no reason
to think of the cvs version text as a serious commitment. If we
DS> For example, what will the "next version" on the 5.1.x line be?
DS>
DS> net-snmp-5.1.2.pre3
DS> net-snmp-5.1.2.rc1
DS> net-snmp-5.1.2
RS> First of all, I don't think any of those would be appropriate for the
RS> current cvs, because they are release names. They need an indicatio
Vincenzo Cicerone wrote:
>Hi
>I refer to the windows project found in the 'old' "net-snmp-5.1"
>package.
>Best regards
>Vincenzo
>
>PS: Thank you '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' for your patience
>
Thank the other developers for their patience with ME :-)
I think that you will find the versions following 5.
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:34:28 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> DS> Thinking about this in abstract, it would probably be sensible for
DS> DS> a lower-level handler to be able to retrieve *either* of these
DS> DS> netsnmp_extract_cache_info(netsnmp_agent_request_info * reqinfo)
DS> DS> netsnmp_extract
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:20:06 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:08:25 -0400, Robert Story (Coders)
WH> 2) However, Robert is wrong that it helps APIs.
Thems theres fightin' words. I would understand 'I disagree', but 'wrong'
seems a bit strong.
WH>Since we can not and
WH>s
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:41:19 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> Robert> I don't think what I'm proposing takes away any flexibility.
DS>
DS> Ok - maybe an example would help.[...]
DS>
DS> Robert> Some of the helper handlers, however, do care. Again, bulk_to_next
DS> is the best example. It needs to do som
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:39:46 -0400, Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
DS> Ok - maybe an example would help.[...]
DS>
DS> Robert> Some of the helper handlers, however, do care. Again, bulk_to_next
DS> is the best example. It needs to do something before and after [...
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:25:32 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> What about the other question - whether to include some sort of
Dave> serial number or timestamp as part of the CVS version? And if
Dave> so, how frequently to update this?
Sorry... Thought I stated that... I
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:26:11 -0400, Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Robert> (side note: I think we ought to use .0 for initial releases-
Robert> eg 5.2.0.pre0, 6.0.0. opinions?)
What gain? I disagree. I don't see a benefit in making the version
number longer if it do
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 1:35:19 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael J. Slifcak) said:
Michael> Is there _significant_ downside to incorporating this patch
Michael> before the 5.1.2 release ?
should be ok if it helps things.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta
---
> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:02:28 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> R 5.1.1
Dave> C 5.1.1+cvs 2004/06/01
Dave> R 5.1.2.pre1
Dave> C 5.1.2.pre1 2004/07/01
I don't think the reported version number as released by the tools
should have anything other than things parsable by .s. I
Sorry, last email was HTML.
Is there any way to make the following line use wildcards for the IP address
(mynetwork)?
# sec.name source community
com2sec local localhost public
com2sec mynetwork 192.168.0.0/24 private
Or better yet, can I set the agent up such t
Is there any way to make the following line use wildcards
for the IP address (mynetwork)?
# sec.name source community
com2sec local localhost public
com2sec mynetwork 192.168.0.0/24 private
Or better yet, can I set the agent up such that it
Do the net-snmp tools support IPv6 ?
If so, what command line switch would I give , say, snmpget?
Brian
Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 1:35:19 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael J. Slifcak) said:
>
>
>Michael> Is there _significant_ downside to incorporating this patch
>Michael> before the 5.1.2 release ?
>
>should be ok if it helps things.
>
Actually, I've got a different patch that w
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:27:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any way to make the following line use wildcards for the IP address
> (mynetwork)?
Use the special token "default" (without quotes) or 0.0.0.0/0
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:09:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do the net-snmp tools support IPv6 ?
If your OS supports it, and if you enabled it during configure
> If so, what command line switch would I give , say, snmpget?
snmpget ::1 sysDescr.0
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Årh
Isn't ::1 for localhost?
That is a good place to start, but ultimately I will need to use a full IPv6
address for a remote SNMP agent.
Would that be similar, in that you just replace ::1 with the full IPv6
address?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Niels Baggesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Isn't ::1 for localhost?
Yes
> That is a good place to start, but ultimately I will need to use a full IPv6
> address for a remote SNMP agent.
>
> Would that be similar, in that you just replace ::1 with the full IPv6
> addres
From: Niels Baggesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPv6
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:43:57 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nba> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nba> > Isn't ::1 for localhost?
nba>
nba> Yes
nba>
nba> > That is a good place to start, but ul
hallo, all
Can SNMP constrain someone the access to some mib vars? so the person can
not access the mib vars, while others can , the behavior is somewhat like
a Linux normal user, who can not execute some command that required the
root access right.
I know the mib can do the read/write limit,
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:52:09 + EastDr wrote:
EA> Can SNMP constrain someone the access to some mib vars?
Yes. That's exactly what VACM does.
EA> If SNMP CAN , then what Should I do. If it is to write a access mib, then
EA> what Should I do with the access mib file?
Read the FAQ on access co
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:15:10 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:39:46 -0400, Robert Story (Coders)
WH> DS> - By default, handlers return success/failure, but don't explicitly
WH> DS> call the next handler in the chain. [...]
WH>
WH> Robert> Well, the problem there is that it's not
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:21:01 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:26:11 -0400, Robert Story (Coders)
WH>
WH> Robert> (side note: I think we ought to use .0 for initial releases-
WH> Robert> eg 5.2.0.pre0, 6.0.0. opinions?)
WH>
WH> What gain?
Consistency. Wasn't someone just saying s
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:24:37 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:02:28 +0100, Dave Shield
WH>
WH> Dave> R 5.1.1
WH> Dave> C 5.1.1+cvs 2004/06/01
WH>
WH> I don't think the reported version number as released by the tools
WH> should have anything other than things parsable by .s. [..
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:42:32 -0400, Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Robert> How about'sera'(as in'que sera sera')?;-) I think it
Robert> fits. 5.2.0.sera(oops, sorry, 5.2.sera)
Very cute, but I bet confusing to a lot of people I think... We'd get
too many "what does t
33 matches
Mail list logo
