problemes with the code created by mib2c.iterate.conf

2006-03-20 Thread 正 王
Hi,all I create netSnmpIETFWGTable.c, netSnmpIETFWGTable.h using NET-SNMP-EXAMPLES-MIB byrunning mib2c mib2c.iterate.conf I initialize table data in netSnmpIETFWGTable_get_first_data_point(), code  struct netSnmpIETFWGTable_entry *tmp; while (netSnmpIETFWGTable_head)/*clean link li

snmp -x ????

2006-03-20 Thread Paulo Ricardo
Hi Dave, I woul like to change the Agen Address field in start up snmpd. I don´t like to use the Solaris Nodename(hostname). I have Net-Snmp 5.1.2 Is the option "-x" works well in Net-Snmp version 5.1.2 ?:??? BR, Paulo --- This SF.Ne

RE: snmp -x ????

2006-03-20 Thread David Hill
I'm probable not the David you are asking, but I will provide some input since I have this same issue a couple of weeks ago. Yes, the -x option can be used. Here is how I use it to launch snmpd as a master and subagent where I want the -x option to be the address of the Master agent: Master Ag

RE: snmp -x ????

2006-03-20 Thread Paulo Ricardo
Hi David, Excuse me. Ahh, This Agent Address is not the Agent Address field in the PDU section of the SNMP protocol, ins´t it?? BR, Paulo From: "David Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paulo Ricardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Subject: RE: snmp -x Date: Mon, 20 Mar

RE: snmp -x ????

2006-03-20 Thread David Hill
I'm not sure I understand your question related to the PDU. I'm using it as the AgentX listen address for my Master Agent as specified in the definition shown below. -x ADDRESS Listens for AgentX connections on the specified address rather than the default '/var/agentx/mast

How can I debug the Link Up/Down trap failure

2006-03-20 Thread Paulo Ricardo
Hi Dave, I have the following problem: Problem: the Snmp trap isn´t generate from Sun Netra 240´s machines: Scenario: Sun Netra 240, Solaris 9, Solaris 9 patches recommended, 4 (four) interfaces Gigabit Ethernet(Bge) Test: Plug/Unplugged the ethernet cable workaround: in the Solaris console

Reporting a reportable configure event

2006-03-20 Thread Kane Estess
Don't know exactly what this means, but the directions were clear, so here it is... Compiled on a late version of Cygwin on XP Pro. Anything else I should do? checking winsock.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: winsock.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: winsock.h: check f