CFV: from bvassche: fix compiler warning

2010-09-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
(note to Bart: we're in voting mode for release candidates on the trunk right now. Which means no one should be touching trunk without discussion -coders first please. Thanks!) Bart already applied this patches which means: 1) if it doesn't get +3 it will be reverted 2) we need to decide if

CFV: compiler warning and possible 64-bit issue

2010-09-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
(note to Bart: we're in voting mode for release candidates on the trunk right now. Which means no one should be touching trunk without discussion -coders first please. Thanks!) Bart already applied this patches which means: 1) if it doesn't get +3 it will be reverted 2) we need to decide if

Re: CFV: compiler warning and possible 64-bit issue

2010-09-04 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: (note to Bart: we're in voting mode for release candidates on the trunk right now. Which means no one should be touching trunk without discussion -coders first please. Thanks!) Bart already applied this

Re: CFV: from bvassche: fix compiler warning

2010-09-04 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: (note to Bart: we're in voting mode for release candidates on the trunk right now. Which means no one should be touching trunk without discussion -coders first please. Thanks!) Bart already applied this

Re: CFV: from bvassche: fix compiler warning

2010-09-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:03:06 +0200, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org said: BVA This change is safe because this function is new and its return value BVA isn't used anywhere. The safety of the change is now judged by the masses. We made this policy quite a while ago because of changes that

Re: CFV: compiler warning and possible 64-bit issue

2010-09-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:01:49 +0200, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org said: BVA How many changes have you committed after rc1 and that did not get BVA a +3 ? 2. They had +2, though. So I took the the release manager has thea ability to make decisions route because the due date for rc2 was

Re: CVF2: don't assume the process status is still available. ham

2010-09-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:01:22 +0200, Thomas Anders thomas.and...@blue-cable.de said: TA What about Robert's proposal to add a DEBUGMSG if the file/process TA went away? New patches to review welcomed :-) -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: CFV: don't do wildcards if exact match exists

2010-09-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:17:37 +0200, Thomas Anders thomas.and...@blue-cable.de said: TA Wes Hardaker wrote: (and I tested it to make sure the functionality works as expected) TA +1, then. Ok, it didn't make it into rc2 because it didn't get +3 (and was non-trivial). It'll get into rc3 if we

Re: CFV: from bvassche: fix compiler warning

2010-09-04 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:03:06 +0200, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org said: BVA This change is safe because this function is new and its return value BVA isn't used anywhere. The safety of the change is

Re: CFV: from bvassche: fix compiler warning

2010-09-04 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: However the patch gets +1 for me +1 from me as well. +Thomas -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.

Re: Passing arguments to an OID with the command line tool

2010-09-04 Thread Osimar Medeiros
Guys, good morning, how are you ? Sorry to jump on you like this, but I am having a problem I think you may know how to help me solving. I have a script, running on a remote server, as a daemon. And, sometimes, It crashes. Ok, so I use Nagios and SNMP to return the info when it's down,

Building net-snmp on windows

2010-09-04 Thread Vinod Nanjaiah
Hi! I am trying to build net-snmp-5.5 on Windows-7 and am stuck at the point where netsnmpmibssdk is to be built. Build instructions that I followed are from http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/docs/README.win32.html -- 5. Build the applications -- MS VC++ 7.0+: Projects libagent, libhelpers,

hrFSRemoteMountPoint

2010-09-04 Thread Osimar Medeiros
Hello, fellows. I am monitoring some remote servers and I need to monitor some file systems where my servers are mounted from. I am using this object: hrFSRemoteMountPoint My doubt is: Does it test the mount point or does it simply check if the mount point is tested ? That doubt is due to a

Strange behavior with SNMP walk.

2010-09-04 Thread Yehiel Samson
Hi, There is a strange behavior with the SNMP walker, if I perform the following command: snmpwalk -One -v2c -c public IP 1.3.6.1.4.1.4491.2.1.20.1.23 I receive this answer: .1.3.6.1.4.1.4491.2.1.20.1.23.1.2.536870914.256 = Hex-STRING: 01 02 03 04

Re: Strange behavior with SNMP walk.

2010-09-04 Thread Steve Friedl
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 07:25:21PM +, Yehiel Samson wrote: There is a strange behavior with the SNMP walker, if I perform the following command: snmpwalk -One -v2c -c public IP 1.3.6.1.4.1.4491.2.1.20.1.23 I receive this answer:

Re: CFV: compiler warning and possible 64-bit issue

2010-09-04 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: However the patch gets +1 for me +1 from me as well. +Thomas -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.