Re: Inconsistency in Bridge entries..

On 16 September 2010 06:54, Mygapula, Sudheer IN BLR SISL wrote: > It’s observed that the dot1dTpFdbAddress and dot1dTpFdbPort array sizes are > not same; even though they are columns of the same table our precondition to > build the terminal topology is that the sizes of both these arrays should

Re: duplicate module error ?

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:13:23 +0300 xor wrote: > XE> Like that : > XE> > XE> > XE> # snmpd -f -c /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf -DALL > > sorry, didn't see that part! That will definitely read snmpd.conf twice, > as /etc/snmp/ is one of the default loc

Re: relation between 'interface' and 'physical port'

> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:56:35 +0530, Abraham Varricatt > said: AV> Thank you VERY much for your response Lee !! You have no idea how much of a AV> headache all this has been giving me. Good Lord, I had no idea how much AV> complexity existed between the different networking components w

Re: sysObjectID still returns an incorrect value

> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:00:42 -0400, Fulko Hew said: FH> WATCHER_MAX_SIZE | WATCHER_SIZE_IS_PTR | WATCHER_SIZE_UNIT_OIDS, FH> whereas the value passed in via sysObjectIDByteLength has already been FH> converted FH> into bytes. so the above statement on line 339 FH> should instead be: FH>

Re: sysObjectID still returns an incorrect value

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Wes Hardaker < harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:00:42 -0400, Fulko Hew > said: > > FH> WATCHER_MAX_SIZE | WATCHER_SIZE_IS_PTR | WATCHER_SIZE_UNIT_OIDS, > > FH> whereas the value passed in via sysObjectIDByteLength has already

Re: CFV: ifAlias support

On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:39:25 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:28:31 -0400, Robert Story said: WH> WH> WH> 1) the last value set for that interface WH> WH> 2) the super-cool string created from kernel info (from the patch) if possible WH> WH> 3) an empty string WH> WH> RS> I'm

Re: hi, how to install net-snmp on hp-unix11 for 64bits, thanks!

On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:58:48 +0800 fu.chang...@zte.com.cn wrote: FCCC>I am try to install net-snmp on hp-unix11 for 32bits, it works correct, FCCC> but when I install it for 64bits(compile it with +DD64), and it running FCCC> error, no matter where I send a request to the snmpd, the snmpd pr

Re: duplicate module error ?

On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:23:30 +0300 xor wrote: XE> register_mib: registering "skynetPortInteger" at XE> SKYNET-SNMP-EXAMPLES-MIB::skynetPortInteger with context "(null)" XE> [...] XE> SKYNET-SNMP-EXAMPLES-MIB::skynetPortInteger.0 Look carefully at those two oids See the difference? Try registe

Re: relation between 'interface' and 'physical port'

On 9/15/10, Abraham Varricatt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Lee wrote: > >> On 9/15/10, Abraham Varricatt >> > >> wrote: >> > I've done some more investigation/study into this and well, could >> someone >> > please confirm if I've got my facts right below? >> >> I'll try :) >> >> >

Re: relation between 'interface' and 'physical port'

On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:39 +0530, Abraham Varricatt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Abraham Varricatt +s...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > What is the relationship between the SNMP reported "interfaces" (in > > MIB-II, I think) and the physical ports on a system? I'm having a > hard > > ti

Finding relation or mapping among LLDP ,IFTable,Bridge table entries.

Hello All, Is there any way to map the entries among LLDP , IfTable, Bridge table entries. I want to map the IfIndex to real device port (which will be coming from LLDP entries). I want map IP address of device (switch) corresponding Mac Address, Corresponding physical port. Thanks. ___