On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:39:25 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> >>>>> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:28:31 -0400, Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> said: WH> WH> WH> 1) the last value set for that interface WH> WH> 2) the super-cool string created from kernel info (from the patch) if possible WH> WH> 3) an empty string WH> WH> RS> I'm not a big fan of this idea. If we pull data from the kernel, WH> RS> then we should keep it in sync. Keeping our own value that doesn't WH> RS> match feels wrong. WH> WH> If you read the object description, though, it really reads like an WH> "snmp only object". We're just pre-populating it with helpful data...
Any vendor which supports aliases probably supports it via all management interfaces... be it netconf, http or cli. To do anything else invites confusion from the user... IMHO, of course... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
