On 11 March 2011 05:16, sujata patra sujata_patra2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have an unsigned long long data , which need to be assigned to counter64.
I can assign that using high part and low part.
That's the correct approach, yes.
The problem is size, as well as endian ness. While conversion
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:37:17 -0800 Stephen wrote:
SH These patches fix the problems with walking the forwarding mib when a
SH router has full BGP feed.
Excellent! I'm glad someone finally had the time to fix this.
The first 3 patches are no-brainers. I'll apply them shortly.
The netlink one is
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:20:36 + Dave wrote:
DS Unfortunately, our code (in snmplib/snmp-tc.c:date_n_time())
DS treats them as equivalent, and hence gets the wrong answer
DS when using the tm_gmtoff form.
DS
DS The fix (attached) is clearly trivial, and I'd like to include this
DS in 5.5.1
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:20:43 + Dave wrote:
DS It doesn't really seem worth spinning another RC release
DS just for these two changes. How would people feel about
DS me going straight to the final 5.5.1 release?
fine with me.
Dave Shield wrote:
The fix (attached) is clearly trivial, and I'd like to include this
in 5.5.1 (although it's not strictly a show-stopper).
+1
Thomas
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 10 March 2011 20:17, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
You might have missed this patch, reporting a bug in 5.5, 5.6 and trunk:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:46:51 -0500
Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:37:17 -0800 Stephen wrote:
SH These patches fix the problems with walking the forwarding mib when a
SH router has full BGP feed.
Excellent! I'm glad someone finally had the time to fix this.
2011/3/4 Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:54:10 +0200, Timo Teräs timo.te...@iki.fi
said:
TT What's the usual time frame for getting patches reviewed and committed?
TT Could someone take a look at this?
It's actually on my todo list to go review the
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:46:51 -0500
Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:37:17 -0800 Stephen wrote:
SH These patches fix the problems with walking the forwarding mib when a
SH router has full BGP feed.
Excellent! I'm glad someone finally had the time to fix this.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger shemmin...@vyatta.comwrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:46:51 -0500
Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:37:17 -0800 Stephen wrote:
SH These patches fix the problems with walking the forwarding mib when a
SH router
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:46:56 +0100
Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger
shemmin...@vyatta.comwrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:46:51 -0500
Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:37:17 -0800 Stephen wrote:
I'm trying to access enums for varbinds and I end up with error saying
uninitialized value in hash element
Code:
@foreach $noti notifications@
@foreach $varb varbinds@
@if $varb.enums@
(
@foreach $vare $varv enum@
varbing-enum$varv $vare
@end@
)
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Eric Smith eri...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to access enums for varbinds and I end up with error saying
uninitialized value in hash element
Code:
@foreach $noti notifications@
@foreach $varb varbinds@
@if $varb.enums@
(
Here's a horrible
13 matches
Mail list logo
