Hi Dave,
Configuration :
---
access operator any noauth exact all none all
group operator usm u4
rouser u4
createUser u4 MD5 password
trapsess -v 3 -l authNoPriv -u u4 xx.xx.xx.xx:162
Query :
---
The regular query snmpwalk -v3 -u u4 -l authNoPriv -a md5 -A password
Hi Dave,
It crashes at :
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0f3cd570 in usm_process_in_msg (msgProcModel=value optimized out,
maxMsgSize=65507,
secParams=value optimized out, secModel=value optimized out,
secLevel=value optimized out,
wholeMsg=0x10144cf0
On 16 March 2010 06:23, srikapilan.gan...@wipro.com wrote:
Configuration :
---
access operator any noauth exact all none all
group operator usm u4
rouser u4
One comment - you are mixing two styles of access control here.
*Either* use the access/group/view lines.
*or*
Hi Dave,
The crash occours only when you associate a host to that v3 user as below:
trapsess -v 3 -l authNoPriv -u u4 xx.xx.xx.xx:162
If I do not associate the user to a host , then everything works fine.
Thanks Regards,
Kapil.
From:
Hi,
What coding style/standard is used in Net-SNMP project? It does not look
like following GNU Coding standard.
Does the code generated using mib2c follow the same style as the Net-SNMP
library?
Regards,
Tony
--
Tony Thomas wrote:
What coding style/standard is used in Net-SNMP project?
See the CodingStyle document that ships with the source.
+Thomas
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for
On 16 March 2010 09:44, srikapilan.gan...@wipro.com wrote:
The crash occours only when you associate a host to that v3 user as below:
trapsess -v 3 -l authNoPriv -u u4 xx.xx.xx.xx:162
Ah - I wondered what you meant by associating a host.
I hadn't realised that you were talking about SNMPv3
On 03/05/2010 04:44 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
Hi,
I've stumbled upon snmpd processing malformed requests. How should
snmplib react to it? E.g. my snmpd received get-request with ASN.1 error
in Request ID - instead of Type: 2, Length: 1, Value: 0xc it received
Type: 32, which is wrong. But the
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:53:42 +0100 Bart wrote:
BVA On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com wrote:
BVA Based on yesterday's conversation, I prepared a patch with solution #2
BVA (put it inside asn_parse_foo (which may not be possible)). My simple
BVA tests show that it
