On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 19:43 +0100, Barbara Kuriata wrote:
> But what happens if some error occurs either in get_first_data_point
> or get_next_data_point routine? Shouldn't the get-next process be
> interrupted and the General Error be returned in Response?
>
> That what I thought after reading
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:08 +0800, livia xie wrote:
> To test the codes, I construct the datas manually. But when
> I run the command of snmpget, it always returns the different values.
I think you'll need to give us a bit more detail.
How exactly are you constructing the returned OIDs and valu
Hi,
I am getting a crash in
While running snmpgetnext -v 2c -t 240 -n "" -c
public 192.168.4.246 ifIndex.256 ifNumber.0
Here is the backtrace
#0 0x4061aa48 in strcmp () from
/opt/Nevis/gcc-v3.2.2/lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x4054f483 in netsnmp_get_list_data (head=0x80bf060,
name=0x80583
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:23 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> according to Dave's testing with CVS MAIN on HP-UX 10.20, test #58
> (snmpwalk) fails against an agent that's running as non-root (as is
> typically the case during "make test"), but succeeds when the agent is
> running as root. (BTW, the
Dave Shield wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:23 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
according to Dave's testing with CVS MAIN on HP-UX 10.20, test #58
(snmpwalk) fails against an agent that's running as non-root (as is
typically the case during "make test"), but succeeds when the agent is
running as ro
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 15:05 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> > I've just submitted a patch to skip these particular tests if
> > 'id -u' doesn't return 0. Currently this only applies for HP-UX
> > kit, but the same thing may be applicable on other systems too.
>
> This may be f
MA> I checked the udp and tcp tables. I generated the code with few options
MA> Ex: mib2c nodename followed by options 2 -> 2-> 2.
MA>
MA> But this code is different than the one in tcp and udp code and am
MA> facing problems with this code. Please give me the options to be given
MA> to mib2c co
Dave Shield wrote:
The current test suite is *much* better than it was, but I don't
think that the "snmpwalk" test is sufficiently focused to be very
useful.
I think it fills a gap that the more focused tests leave. It verifies
two very basic assumption:
1) a series of GETNEXT requests s
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:08:59 +0800 livia wrote:
LX> I have a private table whose index is mac address. I use mib2c to generate
LX> the base codes for me and it recongnizes the mac address index's type as
LX> ASN_OCT_STR. Then I define the mac address as a char array with size of 6.
You want to cha
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 16:35 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> > The current test suite is *much* better than it was, but I don't
> > think that the "snmpwalk" test is sufficiently focused to be very
> > useful.
>
> I think it fills a gap that the more focused tests leave.
How
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 04:28:25 -0800 (PST) jigar wrote:
JC> I am developing AgentX subagent utility in Java on windows 2000
JC> platform. I want to develop is using netsnmp java library.
We don't have a java library. If some third part has developed on, you'll have
to contact them for support
Dave Shield wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 16:35 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
Dave Shield wrote:
The current test suite is *much* better than it was, but I don't
think that the "snmpwalk" test is sufficiently focused to be very
useful.
I think it fills a gap that the more focused tests leave.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:41:26 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EYC> I implemented ifTable subagent using mib2c.mfd.conf, it works great but I
EYC> have some questions about CACHE.
You created a new implementation, right? No copying of the existing code?
EYC> I want to trigger a cache reload only
EY
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:47:29 +0100 Thomas wrote:
TA> Rephrased: I think it *currently* fills a gap that the other *existing*
TA> tests leave. (And as such, it's IMHO *currently* quite useful)
I have to agree. It has revealed at least one bug during this release cycle.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 16:47 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Rephrased: I think it *currently* fills a gap that the other *existing*
> tests leave. (And as such, it's IMHO *currently* quite useful)
Agreed.
And I'm not proposing to remove it.
or at least, not until there's something better to take i
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:29:39 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SO> The internet connection is via dsl PPP, sometimes the link
SO> disconnect and then reconnect automatically. We also have some
SO> OpenVPN tunnels that sometimes disconnect/reconnect.
SO>
SO> This unfortunately leave snmpd whith a ba
16 matches
Mail list logo
