cross-compile of net-snmp 5.1.1

I had netsnmp 5.1.1, everything was installed fine in my Red Hat linux 9.0 using gcc. Then I try to do cross compilation using timesys linux tools. I typed follwoing command:    ->    ./configure --with-cc=ppc4xx-linux-gcc --host=powerpc --withiednianness = big  ->   make    The configure pas

Re: sef fault registering

> I don't think so. Are you saying that an unmodified net-snmp snmpd has > this problem? What PowerPC platform are you on? Which OS? True, net-snmp is unmodified. Both on Intel and on the IBM pSeries 630 running SuSE Linux with 2.4.19 kernel. Don't ask, you'll get the same answer as to why we're

Re: sef fault registering

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:42:25 -0600 Carlos wrote: CC> > CC> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. CC> > CC> [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 13779)] CC> > CC> __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x410) at mutex.c:99 CC> > CC> 99 mutex.c: No such file or directory. CC> > CC> in mute

Re: Error building net-snmp 5.1.1 from ports collection on FBSD 4.7

On or about Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 04:37:45PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:19:39 -0400 Doug wrote: > DM> Tried to update net-snmp agent on my FBSD 4.7 host, using the current > DM> net-snmp in the ports collection... Nothing fancy, just ran a "make", > DM> with defaults. > >

Re: problems with snmptrapd

> I encountered the "broken pipe" error during my tests. > the snmptrapd.conf file only contains the line "traphandle default /bin/pwd" A couple of quick tests seem to indicate that this error is being generated because /bin/pwd doesn't actually read from standard input (and may well close it comp

Re: no snmpd binary

> Iam using ucd-snmp-4.2.6 . When I do a 'make' in the agent directory I > get the following error message - > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lelf Yes - recent versions of RedHat don't seem to include the "version-independent" softlink for libelf.so (or at least, only in a relatively obscure develo

Re: hrStorageIndex values changed from 5.0.9 to 5.1.1

> 5.1.1 > hrStorageEntry.hrStorageDescr.2 = STRING: Real Memory > hrStorageEntry.hrStorageDescr.3 = STRING: Swap Space > > 5.0.9 > hrStorageEntry.hrStorageDescr.101 = STRING: Real Memory > hrStorageEntry.hrStorageDescr.102 = STRING: Swap Space Yes - that's correct. The old arrangement put an ar

Problem with index variable

Hi, I am facing a problem in one of our mib implementation during run-time. I have a table having two different indexes such as one string ( mac address index) and another simple integer index. If I generate the code with ucd-snmp style and implemented my data, the agent is always returning the