Re: Process Monitoring on Windows

2013-02-20 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 02/20/13 19:57, chester.bol...@gdc4s.com wrote: > My plan wasn't to run Net-SNMP as a replacement to the Windows SNMP > service. Is this the only way anyone knows of to get Net-SNMP to return > proper information from the "proc" command? Shouldn't it also work > co-existing with Windows SNMP? T

RE: Process Monitoring on Windows

2013-02-20 Thread Chester.Bolton
My plan wasn't to run Net-SNMP as a replacement to the Windows SNMP service. Is this the only way anyone knows of to get Net-SNMP to return proper information from the "proc" command? Shouldn't it also work co-existing with Windows SNMP? -Original Message- From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bv

Re: Process Monitoring on Windows

2013-02-20 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 02/20/13 19:16, chester.bol...@gdc4s.com wrote: > In which case, both prCount is indicating an ambiguous Integer value of > -1 for these processes and prErrorFlag is indicating Integer 0 for no > Error when these processes are not running. I know I can access the > Windows Host Resources MIB sin

Process Monitoring on Windows

2013-02-20 Thread Chester.Bolton
Hi. I'm trying to get process monitoring via Net-SNMP (running VERSION 5.6.1) to work on a Windows 2008 R2 host. I have no issues doing this on a Linux host but on Windows I use the proc command to monitor a few processes some real and others fake for testing. I have a monitor command stating the f

Re: java snmp subagent support?

2013-02-20 Thread Fulko Hew
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Bryan Levin wrote: > Hi, > > ** ** > > I am pretty sure I know the answer, but I was tasked with exploring what > kind of java snmp subagent support there might be within the net-snmp > framework. From what I can tell, there is a 3rd party project called > s

NULL varbind prior to EndOfMib in GetBulk

2013-02-20 Thread Mike Dick
Version 5.6.1.1, Windows platform... When doing a GetBulk to a proxied agent through snmpd (snmpd is the main agent, proxying to a non net-snmp implementation), snmpd returns an NULL varbind just before the EndOfMib. The last entry of the response has the last OID with its value, followed by the

Re: Applicability in SNMP scalar objects

2013-02-20 Thread Patricia Chocan Fernandez
Dear Mr. Hew, thanks for your fast answer. In my opinion, using a "not-applicable" value is the best option. Nevertheless, I am a bit doubtful regarding the options: - Should we return a noSuchObject error, and act like the object is temporarily not implemented? - Should we retu