On 22/08/06, Sachin Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its difficult at this point to upgrade. I will like to know where
exactly this value(val_len) is filled. If someone can point to the
location in the code, that will be helpful.
Which module (and which object) are you talking about?
'val_len'
On 23/08/06, Sachin Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I am trying to set the value of the object on a 64 bit
machine, the requests variable passed in the table_handler function
has requests-requestvb-val_len assigned as 8. I want to know why this
value is 8 and not 4.
Thanks Dave. Size of long is 8. Was just curious if I can get the
portion of the code where the value is assigned.
-Sachin
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 15:19, Dave Shield wrote:
On 23/08/06, Sachin Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I am trying to set the value of the object on a
On 23/08/06, Sachin Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave. Size of long is 8. Was just curious if I can get the
portion of the code where the value is assigned.
Ummm...
Probably as follows: snmplib/snmp_api.c:snmp_pdu_parse(): lines 4429ff:
switch ((short) vp-type) {
I am running net-snmp 5.3.0.1 on a 64 bit machine. When I try to
set any attribute defined as Integer32 data-type in the MIB, the
requests var in the handler return the value val_len as 8. Shouldn't
this value be 4 (=sizeof(int))? Also, I want to know where does the
value of val_len gets set
Sachin Mishra wrote:
I am running net-snmp 5.3.0.1 on a 64 bit machine. When I try to
set any attribute defined as Integer32 data-type in the MIB, the
requests var in the handler return the value val_len as 8. Shouldn't
this value be 4 (=sizeof(int))? Also, I want to know where does the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSent: 2005$BG/(J4$B7n(J26$BF|(J 0:45
(BTo: LIAO, GUANGDENG
(BCc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
(BSubject: Re: Problem on 64 bit machine: Timeout: No response from localhost
(B
(BOn Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:17:46 +0800 LIAO, wrote:
(BLG The OS environment: RHEL
template PDU
(B
(BWhat happens?
(BAny help?
(B
(B
(BThanks
(BDanny
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSent: 2005$BG/(J4$B7n(J26$BF|(J 0:45
(BTo: LIAO, GUANGDENG
(BCc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
(BSubject: Re: Problem on 64 bit
on 64 bit machine: Timeout: No response from localhost
(B
(BOn Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:28:00 +0800 LIAO, wrote:
(BLG Sorry to forget the environment:(
(BLG
(BLG NET-SNMP version 5.1.2.
(B
(BWhat OS?
(B
(B--
(BNOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
(B
Latest version of Fedora net-snmp has the following patch which fixes
this issue ...
Radek
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 10:26 +0800, LIAO, GUANGDENG wrote:
Hi all,
When I run the command line : snmptable -v1 -c test localhost
ip.ipAddrTableon 64bit machine, the result is :Timeout: No response from
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:59:42 +0200 Radek wrote:
RV On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 10:26 +0800, LIAO, GUANGDENG wrote:
RV Hi all,
RV When I run the command line : snmptable -v1 -c test localhost
RV ip.ipAddrTableon 64bit machine, the result is :Timeout: No response from
RV localhost. The snmpd is
Eek, made a cut-n-paste error in my last msg..
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:32:23 -0400 Robert wrote:
RS The real problem is that the old api uses snmp_set_var_value, not
RS snmp_set_var_value (which is where Radek's patch is), and
^^
should be snmp_varlist_add_variable.
It looks
Hi all,
When I run the command line : snmptable -v1 -c test localhost
ip.ipAddrTableon 64bit machine, the result is :Timeout: No response from
localhost. The snmpd is running and configuration file is ok.
When I try to dig out it, I find the problem is caused in asn_build_int
which build the 32
Sorry to forget the environment:(
(B
(BNET-SNMP version 5.1.2.
(B
(BThanks
(BDanny
(B
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: LIAO, GUANGDENG
(BSent: 2005$BG/(J4$B7n(J20$BF|(J 10:26
(BTo: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
(BCc: LIAO, GUANGDENG
(BSubject: Problem on 64 bit
14 matches
Mail list logo
