On 30.03.2011 12:09, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 10:49, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> But - thanks for your help - I think we found a bug in the application and
>> it now replies:
>>
>> # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1611 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.2
>> SNMPv
On 30 March 2011 10:49, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> But - thanks for your help - I think we found a bug in the application and it
> now replies:
>
> # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1611 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.2
> SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.34039.10.9 = INTEGER: 0
> SNM
On 30.03.2011 11:33, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 10:03, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> - snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>>>.1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>
> My apologies - that should have been
>
> snmpget -v 2c -c public l
On 30 March 2011 10:03, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> - snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
My apologies - that should have been
snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
.1.3.6.1.4.1.3403
On 30.03.2011 10:42, Dave Shield wrote:
> Let's just check exactly what's happening, by taking the Net-SNMP agent
> out of the equation.
> Can you please try the following requests, and let us know what response
> you get:
>
> - snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.
On 30 March 2011 09:20, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Below, two outputs ending with crash:
> Sending 147 bytes to UDP: [127.0.0.1]:1611->[0.0.0.0]:0
> : 30 81 90 02 01 01 04 06 70 75 62 6C 69 63 A0 81 0...public..
> 0016: 82 02 04 49 42 E3 A5 02 01 00 02 01 00 30 74 30 ...IB...
On 30.03.2011 01:25, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 17:36, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> What queries are you sending to the agent?
>>
>> Well, not so sure here.
>
> What is the client application that's sending the original request?
> snmpget? snmpwalk? something else?
snmpd talks to
On 29 March 2011 17:36, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> What queries are you sending to the agent?
>
> Well, not so sure here.
What is the client application that's sending the original request?
snmpget? snmpwalk? something else?
> I checked with tcpdump or strace, and snmpd sends this:
Hmmm
On 29.03.2011 18:22, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 11:47, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> snmpd (5.6.1) crashes for me quite frequently after logging "response to
>> proxy request illegal. We're screwed".
>>
>> Is there anything I can do to debug it further?
>
> What proxy entries do you ha
On 29 March 2011 11:47, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> snmpd (5.6.1) crashes for me quite frequently after logging "response to
> proxy request illegal. We're screwed".
>
> Is there anything I can do to debug it further?
What proxy entries do you have in the snmpd.conf file?
What queries are you s
On 11/04/2008, Farooq Maniar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there by any chance I can get the net-snmp 5.1 version from
> somewhere?
Go the project website (www.net-snmp.org), rather than the
SourceForge pages, and follow the "Download" link in the
navigation menu. One of the options on that
, 2008 3:24 AM
To: Farooq Maniar
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: snmpd crash
On 11/04/2008, Farooq Maniar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using snmp version 5.1 and its been cross compiled for octeon.
That is a *VERY* old version - November 2003, if you do mean 5.
On 11/04/2008, Farooq Maniar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using snmp version 5.1 and its been cross compiled for octeon.
That is a *VERY* old version - November 2003, if you do mean 5.1
(rather than one of the later 5.1.x releases). There's been a
*lot* of debugging and improvements since t
Hello Dave!
Do I have any way to disable notification log ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vlad
Shafransky
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:18 AM
To: Dave Shield; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: SNMPD
On 14/11/06, Vlad Shafransky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Dave!
A favour - can you please direct questions *purely* to the list, rather
than to specific individuals. I may have to scale back on my involvement
with this project for a while, and would appreciate not having questions
sent (or
Kurapati M-G19456 wrote:
> Try applying the following patch:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1565703&group_id=12694&atid=312694
Unfortunately, snmpd again crashed immediately.
After looking at the changes in detail, I'm not sure what exactly they
fix, as in both cases
Try applying the following patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1565703&group_id=12694&atid=312694
Caution:
Patch is based on NET-SNMP-5.2.2
Regards
Mahesh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josef Moellers
Sent:
Kurapati M-G19456 wrote:
> We are seeing the following crash in NET-SNMP-5.2.2 for SNMPD. Looks
> like, SNMPD is trying to access freed reginfo, as part of servicing the
> delegated request when SubAgent is dead.
[...]
> Did anybody face this kind of crash in SNMPD? Any fix available?
Can it be
18 matches
Mail list logo
