On 04/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to inform that I am trying to learn SNMP form William
> Stallings SNMP,SNMPV2,Snmpv3,and RMON 1 and 2.
Yup - that's a reasonable book,
I found it a bit repetative when describing the three versions of SNMP,
and not partic
Hi Dave,
Many thanks for your response and suggestion.
I would like to inform that I am trying to learn SNMP form William
Stallings SNMP,SNMPV2,Snmpv3,and RMON 1 and 2. In this book it is
mentioned that noSuchInstance will be put in the value field .But it was
not clear for me that it is
On 04/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to verify my understanding.
> So "noSuchInstance" is a ASN1 type.
Sort of.
See RFC 1905, section 3 for the definition of the VarBind structure.
> I would like to know more about how the coding is being done. Could you
>
Hi Dave,
Many thanks for the response.
I would like to verify my understanding.
So "noSuchInstance" is a ASN1 type .So while encoding the PDU it will be
different than other type such as INTEGER, GAUGE32 etc. So manger while
decoding will come to knows that it is ""noSuchInstance". Please let me
On 04/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> suppose noSuchInstance pseudo-values is 10
No. It doesn't work that way,
The exception pseudo-value *is* "noSuchInstance"
This is essentially a type in its own right - distinct from
integer, octet string, OID, etc
> Then how manag
age-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Dave Shield
>Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 2:22 PM
>To: Somenath Pal (WT01 - TES-Access Networks)
>Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: Question regarding SNMP GET response PDU
>
On 04/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one basic question regarding SNMPv2 GET response PDU.
> Suppose manager has queried for 3 attributes say v1, v2, v3, v4
>
> Now suppose the response for the attributes are as follows.
>
> V1success
> V2 erro
