me.
Best regards.
=
From: Velu Munuswamy [mailto:velumunusw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 8:27 PM
To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Reg: net-snmpd crash
Hi,
We are getting a se
Hi,
We are getting a segmentation fault in "run_config_handler" which
is in net_snmpd library code. core dump is not consistent to reproduce the
issue.
Using net-snmp version 5.8. Below is the backtrace.
<<
(gdb) bt
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x7ff35d9e4286 in run_config_ha
On 30.03.2011 12:09, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 10:49, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> But - thanks for your help - I think we found a bug in the application and
>> it now replies:
>>
>> # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1611 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.2
>> SNMPv
On 30 March 2011 10:49, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> But - thanks for your help - I think we found a bug in the application and it
> now replies:
>
> # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1611 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.2
> SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.34039.10.9 = INTEGER: 0
> SNM
On 30.03.2011 11:33, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 10:03, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> - snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>>>.1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>
> My apologies - that should have been
>
> snmpget -v 2c -c public l
On 30 March 2011 10:03, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> - snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
My apologies - that should have been
snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
.1.3.6.1.4.1.3403
On 30.03.2011 10:42, Dave Shield wrote:
> Let's just check exactly what's happening, by taking the Net-SNMP agent
> out of the equation.
> Can you please try the following requests, and let us know what response
> you get:
>
> - snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.
On 30 March 2011 09:20, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Below, two outputs ending with crash:
> Sending 147 bytes to UDP: [127.0.0.1]:1611->[0.0.0.0]:0
> : 30 81 90 02 01 01 04 06 70 75 62 6C 69 63 A0 81 0...public..
> 0016: 82 02 04 49 42 E3 A5 02 01 00 02 01 00 30 74 30 ...IB...
On 30.03.2011 01:25, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 17:36, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> What queries are you sending to the agent?
>>
>> Well, not so sure here.
>
> What is the client application that's sending the original request?
> snmpget? snmpwalk? something else?
snmpd talks to
On 29 March 2011 17:36, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> What queries are you sending to the agent?
>
> Well, not so sure here.
What is the client application that's sending the original request?
snmpget? snmpwalk? something else?
> I checked with tcpdump or strace, and snmpd sends this:
Hmmm
On 29.03.2011 18:22, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 11:47, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> snmpd (5.6.1) crashes for me quite frequently after logging "response to
>> proxy request illegal. We're screwed".
>>
>> Is there anything I can do to debug it further?
>
> What proxy entries do you ha
On 29 March 2011 11:47, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> snmpd (5.6.1) crashes for me quite frequently after logging "response to
> proxy request illegal. We're screwed".
>
> Is there anything I can do to debug it further?
What proxy entries do you have in the snmpd.conf file?
What queries are you s
snmpd (5.6.1) crashes for me quite frequently after logging "response to proxy
request illegal. We're screwed".
Is there anything I can do to debug it further?
There was a similar case back in 2005, with no fix though:
http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.unix.net-snmp-users/browse_thread/t
On 11/04/2008, Farooq Maniar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there by any chance I can get the net-snmp 5.1 version from
> somewhere?
Go the project website (www.net-snmp.org), rather than the
SourceForge pages, and follow the "Download" link in the
navigation menu. One of the options on that
, 2008 3:24 AM
To: Farooq Maniar
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: snmpd crash
On 11/04/2008, Farooq Maniar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using snmp version 5.1 and its been cross compiled for octeon.
That is a *VERY* old version - November 2003, if you do mean 5.
On 11/04/2008, Farooq Maniar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using snmp version 5.1 and its been cross compiled for octeon.
That is a *VERY* old version - November 2003, if you do mean 5.1
(rather than one of the later 5.1.x releases). There's been a
*lot* of debugging and improvements since t
Hi Guys,
I am using snmp version 5.1 and its been cross compiled for octeon.
When I try to start the snmpd daemon, it crashes while initializing
agent. I am not sure what is wrong, I attached gdb and it seemed to have
crashed in container.c file. The back trace of the snmpd is given below:
Hello Dave!
Do I have any way to disable notification log ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vlad
Shafransky
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:18 AM
To: Dave Shield; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: SNMPD
On 14/11/06, Vlad Shafransky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Dave!
A favour - can you please direct questions *purely* to the list, rather
than to specific individuals. I may have to scale back on my involvement
with this project for a while, and would appreciate not having questions
sent (or
Hello!
I use net-snmp-5.3.0.1-1.EL4 with dynamic module.
We performed some load test and after 10 hours snmpd had crashed.
Below you may see back trace from the core.
I would like to mention that load test sends exactly same trap (i.e. the
payload of snmp packet exactly same).
I saw that snmp_oid_
> To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: snmpd crash when AgentX subagent does not respond
>
> We are having trouble with non-responsive AgentX subagents taking down snmpd.
> AFAICT this is due to several GET/GETNEXT requests arriving before snmpd
> decides t
oellers
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:42 PM
To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: snmpd crash when AgentX subagent does not respond
We are having trouble with non-responsive AgentX subagents taking down snmpd.
AFAICT this is due to several GET/GETNEXT requests arriving before sn
We are having trouble with non-responsive AgentX subagents taking down
snmpd. AFAICT this is due to several GET/GETNEXT requests arriving
before snmpd decides that the first request has ultimately timed out and
the agentx session is closed. Also, the cause seems to be problems with
dynamic stor
Kurapati M-G19456 wrote:
> We are seeing the following crash in NET-SNMP-5.2.2 for SNMPD. Looks
> like, SNMPD is trying to access freed reginfo, as part of servicing the
> delegated request when SubAgent is dead.
[...]
> Did anybody face this kind of crash in SNMPD? Any fix available?
Can it be
Hello list,
We are seeing the
following crash in NET-SNMP-5.2.2 for SNMPD. Looks like, SNMPD is trying to
access freed reginfo, as part of servicing the delegated request when SubAgent
is dead.
Following is the
core for the same.
(gdb) bt#0
netsnmp_call_handlers (reginfo=0x14300101
Hello list,
We are using
NET-SNMP-5.2.2, and we have a subagent (linked with NET-SNMP-5.2.2
libraries). When the subagent closes the session, while a Manager is
walking on the MIBs supported by it, we are seeing SNMPD crash. Following
is the stack trace of it.
#0
26 matches
Mail list logo
