Re: [NetBehaviour] Potentially Harmful

2016-05-25 Thread lara
we had recently a conversation on LGM list about this - broadcasting not suitable for photo sensitive people - there's some UK based advice on it here on flashing images that may cause harm to viewers: https://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/photosensitive-epilepsy/triggers

Re: [NetBehaviour] Potentially Harmful

2016-05-25 Thread Alan Sondheim
There is a very famous case in Japan, of a children's anime which created seizures in children; later it was shown on a newscast and even more people had them. I've always had to be careful with my own work which has flickered at times. - Alan On Wed, 25 May 2016, marc garrett wrote: Hi

Re: [NetBehaviour] Potentially Harmful

2016-05-25 Thread Paul Hertz
Welcome to the grand tradition of Tony Conrad's Flicker films. Still capable of causing epileptic seizures after all these years. -- Paul On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:18 PM, marc garrett wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > Yes, I agree with Rob. > > You've made yourself extra cool

Re: [NetBehaviour] Potentially Harmful

2016-05-25 Thread Rob Myers
On Wed, 25 May 2016, at 07:17 AM, Antonio Roberts wrote: > I recently made an ident for MTV that was shown everywhere apart from > the UK. This was due to the ident containing "Potentially Harmful" > content. I've never worked in broadcast before and, whilst I know > flashing imagery should be