On 15/01/12 12:15, manik wrote:
...OUR MAINSTREAM DREAM...WE COULD BE SHOCKED...MANIK...JANUARY...2012...
I am shocked to find that I *can* be shocked.
This brutality is therefore civilising for me.
- Rob.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] DREAM/WE COULD BE SHOCKED V/
On 15/01/12 12:15, manik wrote:
...OUR MAINSTREAM DREAM...WE COULD BE SHOCKED...MANIK...JANUARY...2012...
I am shocked
of the piece is
touching.
Bob
From: Michael Szpakowski szp...@yahoo.com
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 23:44:32
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] dream
Thank-you Bob!
I see what you mean about
@netbehaviour.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 23:44:32
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] dream
Thank-you Bob!
I see what you mean about reversing the editing. I can see that it could work.
I think it's the way it is because I didn't really have a plan and the order of
shots is simply the order I shot them
Michael,
It's a beautiful, haunting piece. The dramatic setting and the plaintive music
communicates movingly the inner emotions of the tiny human figure in the
frame... solitude, yearning and resilience are all mixed up in there.
Since the piece is essentially two shots have you considered
? and yet, in a way, for me..it is..
Enough! Thanks!
m.
--- On Mon, 6/6/11, bob catchpole bobcatchp...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
From: bob catchpole bobcatchp...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] dream
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Monday
