On 6/7/21 9:26 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 14:24, Jiří Kovalský wrote:
From that point of view it makes more sense to concentrate the testing
effort around LTS version with known NetCAT start/end dates, form a
dedicated team of volunteers with free capacity, certify the
I also fully agree with Jirka's opinion. Not that easy to get long-term
contributors.
Kai
On 6/7/2021 3:24 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote:
Dne 07. 06. 21 v 14:01 Neil C Smith napsal(a):
[snip]
Personally I think we need to figure out a way to make NetCAT a more
fluid, open and ongoing thing, or
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 14:24, Jiří Kovalský wrote:
> From that point of view it makes more sense to concentrate the testing
> effort around LTS version with known NetCAT start/end dates, form a
> dedicated team of volunteers with free capacity, certify the whole
> product and release it. Thanks
Dne 07. 06. 21 v 14:01 Neil C Smith napsal(a):
[snip]
Personally I think we need to figure out a way to make NetCAT a more
fluid, open and ongoing thing, or drop it.
Now we've moved to voted betas, rather than just advertising them,
maybe we can encourage anyone testing them to pick a NetCAT
I suppose at the time prior to releases, the assorted focus area could
perform a sub-set of their tests area where applicable and provide any
feedback prior to the release.
Maybe the testing could also be influenced by what changed in the given
release.
I still thing running the whole thing
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 21:34, Eric Bresie wrote:
> So then no plans for LTS with Netcat testing until tentatively Feb 2022?
I think "tentatively" being the word! Based on the discussion prior
to 12.3 that led to lazy consensus on pushing back any LTS, we agreed
-
"""
* NetCAT won't be run as
